Preventing Opioid Use Among Justice-involved Youth as They Transition to Adulthood Leveraging Safe Adults (LeSA)

NCT ID: NCT04678960

Last Updated: 2025-12-12

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

250 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2021-02-15

Study Completion Date

2025-09-30

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Across the US, substance use is a significant public health concern, with juvenile justice (JJ)-involved youth representing a particularly vulnerable population. The current study proposes to adapt and test an intervention Trust-based Relational Intervention® (TBRI®) for preventing initiation and/or escalation of opioid misuse among older adolescents involved in the JJ system. Successful completion of study aims will provide information on TBRI's utility for older JJ adolescents, barriers and facilitators of sustainment, and provide training and implementation support for sustainment in participating facilities.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Across the US, substance use (SU) is a significant public health concern, with an estimated 11.1 million misusing prescription opioids. Rates of opioid use disorders (OUDs) have increased exponentially, with 60% of overdoses attributed to heroin and illicit synthetics (such as Fentanyl). Although opioid use among youth is low compared to adults, experimentation and regular use increases later in adolescence as youth transition to adulthood. Juvenile justice (JJ)-involved youth represent a particularly vulnerable population, as they often experience mental health disorders, dysfunctional family/social relationships, and complex trauma, placing them at greater risk for SU and substance use disorders (SUDs). To ensure that these youth do not become another opioid statistic, innovative and effective prevention interventions are needed. The investigators propose to adapt and test an intervention for preventing initiation and/or escalation of opioid misuse among older JJ-involved adolescents. The target enrollment group will be youth aging out of JJ (15-18 years at study enrollment) who are transitioning to their communities after a period of detainment in a secure treatment or correctional facility. Trust-based Relational Intervention® (TBRI®; a relational, attachment-based intervention that promotes emotional regulation through interaction with responsive adults) will be adapted as a prevention intervention targeting youth at risk for SU (especially non-medical use of opioids). Safe adults (e.g., parent/guardian, extended family member) will be trained in behavior management techniques for empowering youth to appropriately express their needs, connecting them with others in pro-social ways, and correcting or reshaping undesirable behavior. The proposed Effectiveness/Implementation study will examine both the effectiveness of TBRI for preventing opioid misuse and the comparative utility of three support formats: (1) TBRI Training only, (2) TBRI Training + Structured Coaching, or (3) TBRI Training + Responsive Coaching (triggered by the youth's need/risk). A total of 360 youth/safe adult dyads will be recruited from 9 participating JJ facilities over a 3-year period, and followed for 18 months post-release (15 youth-adult dyads/year per facility). This design enables a comparison of TBRI versus Standard Reentry Practice (SRP; using a stepped-wedge design where each facility serves as its own control) plus a randomized control trial comparing 3 TBRI support formats. This study will also examine barriers and facilitators of TBRI sustainment. Ninety JJ staff (10 from each agency) will provide input annually via focus groups and surveys. TCU will work with administrators and staff at each JJ facility to implement a sustainment plan, which will include developing in-house TBRI expertise (i.e., staff training and implementation assistance). Successful completion of study aims will provide a test of the adapted intervention and will facilitate sustainment by providing training and implementation support to participating facilities.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Opioid Use Substance Use

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

An effectiveness-Implementation Hybrid Design - Type 1; Randomized controlled trial and delayed-start study testing the effectiveness of Trust-based Relational Intervention and three different support formats (no coaching/structured coaching/adaptive coaching) among Juvenile Justice (JJ)-involved youth transitioning to their communities and a safe adult (e.g. parent/guardian, extended family member). In the delayed-start design, JJ agencies are randomly assigned to four different starting points with two months apart for starting the project. The last 18-months of the delayed-start design will provide a naturalistic investigation of sustainment of the intervention within the facilities after responsibility for intervention delivery has been transferred from TCU to the JJ agencies (TCU provide trainings to foster in-house TBRI expertise and assistance for implementation).
Primary Study Purpose

PREVENTION

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Standard Reentry Practice

Youth/safe adult participants only receive assessments (baseline assessment while youth are at the facility; 3, 6, 12, 18 months follow-up assessments after youth are released from the facility).

Group Type NO_INTERVENTION

No interventions assigned to this group

TBRI Training only

Youth/safe adult dyads participate in 9 TBRI caregiver modules (caregivers only), 9 youth modules (youth only), and 4 Nurture Groups (caregiver and youth joint role-play activities) prior to youth's release.

After the youth's release, they would receive phone support (only when requested by the caregiver or youth).

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Trust-based Relational Intervention Training

Intervention Type BEHAVIORAL

The intervention (Trust-based Relational Intervention® TBRI®) uses a youth-centered, attachment-based, and trauma-informed approach to strengthen youth/safe adult relationships and improve youth self-regulation (thinking, emotions, and behavior). TBRI includes TBRI Group Training and TBRI In-Home Coaching.

TBRI Group Training is comprised of three components: TBRI Youth Group Training (youth only), Caregiver Training (caregivers only), and Nurture Groups (youth-caregiver joint roleplay activities), which is conducted prior to youth's release.

TBRI Training + TBRI In-Home Structured Coaching

Youth/safe adult dyads participate in 9 TBRI caregiver modules (caregivers only), 9 youth modules (youth only), and 4 Nurture Groups (caregiver and youth joint role-play activities) prior to youth's release.

After youth's release, trained TCU TBRI Practitioners provide coaching sessions to youth/safe adult dyads in which they meet 4 times (once monthly) over the first 4 months following release.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Trust-based Relational Intervention Training

Intervention Type BEHAVIORAL

The intervention (Trust-based Relational Intervention® TBRI®) uses a youth-centered, attachment-based, and trauma-informed approach to strengthen youth/safe adult relationships and improve youth self-regulation (thinking, emotions, and behavior). TBRI includes TBRI Group Training and TBRI In-Home Coaching.

TBRI Group Training is comprised of three components: TBRI Youth Group Training (youth only), Caregiver Training (caregivers only), and Nurture Groups (youth-caregiver joint roleplay activities), which is conducted prior to youth's release.

Trust-based Relational Intervention In-Home Structured Coaching

Intervention Type BEHAVIORAL

The intervention (Trust-based Relational Intervention® TBRI®) uses a youth-centered, attachment-based, and trauma-informed approach to strengthen youth/safe adult relationships and improve youth self-regulation (thinking, emotions, and behavior). TBRI includes TBRI Group Training and TBRI In-Home Coaching.

TBRI In-Home Structured Training includes four structured in-home coaching sessions.

TBRI Training + TBRI In-Home Responsive Coaching

Youth/safe adult dyads participate in 9 TBRI caregiver modules (caregivers only), 9 youth modules (youth only), and 4 Nurture Groups (caregiver and youth joint role-play activities) prior to youth's release.

After youth's release, trained TCU TBRI Practitioners provide coaching sessions to youth/safe adult dyads. They meet a minimum of 2 times during the first 2 months after release. Starting from Month 3, TBRI Practitioners would provide additional coaching when requested or when a research assistant (RA) identifies a need for additional coaching sessions.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Trust-based Relational Intervention Training

Intervention Type BEHAVIORAL

The intervention (Trust-based Relational Intervention® TBRI®) uses a youth-centered, attachment-based, and trauma-informed approach to strengthen youth/safe adult relationships and improve youth self-regulation (thinking, emotions, and behavior). TBRI includes TBRI Group Training and TBRI In-Home Coaching.

TBRI Group Training is comprised of three components: TBRI Youth Group Training (youth only), Caregiver Training (caregivers only), and Nurture Groups (youth-caregiver joint roleplay activities), which is conducted prior to youth's release.

Trust-based Relational Intervention In-Home Responsive Coaching

Intervention Type BEHAVIORAL

The intervention (Trust-based Relational Intervention® TBRI®) uses a youth-centered, attachment-based, and trauma-informed approach to strengthen youth/safe adult relationships and improve youth self-regulation (thinking, emotions, and behavior). TBRI includes TBRI Group Training and TBRI In-Home Coaching.

TBRI In-Home Responsive Training includes at least 2 structured in-home coaching sessions plus additional sessions indefinitely as needed.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Trust-based Relational Intervention Training

The intervention (Trust-based Relational Intervention® TBRI®) uses a youth-centered, attachment-based, and trauma-informed approach to strengthen youth/safe adult relationships and improve youth self-regulation (thinking, emotions, and behavior). TBRI includes TBRI Group Training and TBRI In-Home Coaching.

TBRI Group Training is comprised of three components: TBRI Youth Group Training (youth only), Caregiver Training (caregivers only), and Nurture Groups (youth-caregiver joint roleplay activities), which is conducted prior to youth's release.

Intervention Type BEHAVIORAL

Trust-based Relational Intervention In-Home Structured Coaching

The intervention (Trust-based Relational Intervention® TBRI®) uses a youth-centered, attachment-based, and trauma-informed approach to strengthen youth/safe adult relationships and improve youth self-regulation (thinking, emotions, and behavior). TBRI includes TBRI Group Training and TBRI In-Home Coaching.

TBRI In-Home Structured Training includes four structured in-home coaching sessions.

Intervention Type BEHAVIORAL

Trust-based Relational Intervention In-Home Responsive Coaching

The intervention (Trust-based Relational Intervention® TBRI®) uses a youth-centered, attachment-based, and trauma-informed approach to strengthen youth/safe adult relationships and improve youth self-regulation (thinking, emotions, and behavior). TBRI includes TBRI Group Training and TBRI In-Home Coaching.

TBRI In-Home Responsive Training includes at least 2 structured in-home coaching sessions plus additional sessions indefinitely as needed.

Intervention Type BEHAVIORAL

Other Intervention Names

Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.

TBRI TBRI Structured Coaching TBRI Responsive Coaching

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

For the effectiveness component,

* Youth ages 15-18 at study enrollment
* Being disposed to community supervision (i.e., probation) following a minimum of 2 months in the secure residential JJ facility
* No indication of active suicide risk
* Being able to identify one safe adult that is willing to participate in the study.

For the implementation component:

• All staff with direct care or supervisory responsibilities within and outside the facilities (i.e., officers supervising youth after release) working with TCU on the LeSA project.

Exclusion Criteria

* Youth outside the age range described above
* Active suicide risk at the time of recruitment
Minimum Eligible Age

15 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

20 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Texas Christian University

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Danica K Knight, Ph.D.

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Texas Christian University

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Illinois Youth Center - Chicago

Chicago, Illinois, United States

Site Status

Illinois Youth Center - Pere Marquette

Grafton, Illinois, United States

Site Status

Illinois Youth Center- Harrisburg

Harrisburg, Illinois, United States

Site Status

Illinois Youth Center- Warrenville

Naperville, Illinois, United States

Site Status

Illinois Youth Center - St. Charles

St. Charles, Illinois, United States

Site Status

Grayson County Juvenile Center/Boot Camp

Denison, Texas, United States

Site Status

Texas Monarch Academy for Girls/Rite of Passage

Denison, Texas, United States

Site Status

Williamson County Juvenile Services

Georgetown, Texas, United States

Site Status

Lake Granbury Youth Services/Rite of Passage

Granbury, Texas, United States

Site Status

Harris County Youth Village

Houston, Texas, United States

Site Status

Collin County Juvenile Probation Services

McKinney, Texas, United States

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United States

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

National Center for Mental Health and Juvenile Justice. (2016, September). Trauma among youth in the Juvenile Justice System. Retrieved March 7, 2019 from https://www.ncmhjj.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/09/Trauma-Among-Youth-in-the- Juvenile-Justice-System-for-WEBSITE.pdf

Reference Type BACKGROUND

Nelis D, Kotsou I, Quoidbach J, Hansenne M, Weytens F, Dupuis P, Mikolajczak M. Increasing emotional competence improves psychological and physical well-being, social relationships, and employability. Emotion. 2011 Apr;11(2):354-66. doi: 10.1037/a0021554.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 21500904 (View on PubMed)

Biederman J, Faraone SV, Monuteaux MC, Feighner JA. Patterns of alcohol and drug use in adolescents can be predicted by parental substance use disorders. Pediatrics. 2000 Oct;106(4):792-7. doi: 10.1542/peds.106.4.792.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 11015524 (View on PubMed)

Baglivio, M. T., & Epps, N. (2016). The interrelatedness of adverse childhood experiences among high-risk juvenile offenders. Youth Violence and Juvenile Justice, 14(3), 179-198.

Reference Type BACKGROUND

Baglivio, M. T., Wolff, K. T., Piquero, A. R., & Epps, N. (2015). The relationship between Adverse Childhood Experiences (ACE) and juvenile offending trajectories in a juvenile offender sample. Journal of Criminal Justice, 43(3), 229-241.

Reference Type BACKGROUND

Belenko S, Johnson ID, Taxman FS, Rieckmann T. Probation Staff Attitudes Toward Substance Abuse Treatment and Evidence-Based Practices. Int J Offender Ther Comp Criminol. 2018 Feb;62(2):313-333. doi: 10.1177/0306624X16650679. Epub 2016 May 23.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 27220361 (View on PubMed)

Brockie TN, Dana-Sacco G, Wallen GR, Wilcox HC, Campbell JC. The Relationship of Adverse Childhood Experiences to PTSD, Depression, Poly-Drug Use and Suicide Attempt in Reservation-Based Native American Adolescents and Young Adults. Am J Community Psychol. 2015 Jun;55(3-4):411-21. doi: 10.1007/s10464-015-9721-3.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 25893815 (View on PubMed)

Brown LK, Tarantino N, Tolou-Shams M, Esposito-Smythers C, Healy MG, Craker L. Mental Health Symptoms and Parenting Stress of Parents of Court-Involved Youth. J Child Fam Stud. 2018 Mar;27(3):843-852. doi: 10.1007/s10826-017-0923-1. Epub 2017 Nov 6.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 29805245 (View on PubMed)

Colder CR, Shyhalla K, Frndak SE. Early alcohol use with parental permission: Psychosocial characteristics and drinking in late adolescence. Addict Behav. 2018 Jan;76:82-87. doi: 10.1016/j.addbeh.2017.07.030. Epub 2017 Jul 25.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 28772246 (View on PubMed)

Council of State Governments Justice Center. (2017, September). Dos and don'ts for reducing recidivism among young adults in the justice system. Retrieved February 15, 2019 from https://csgjusticecenter.org/wp-content/uploads/2017/09/Dos-and-Donts-for-Reducing- Recidivism-among-Young-Adults-in-the-Justice-System.pdf

Reference Type BACKGROUND

Dube SR, Miller JW, Brown DW, Giles WH, Felitti VJ, Dong M, Anda RF. Adverse childhood experiences and the association with ever using alcohol and initiating alcohol use during adolescence. J Adolesc Health. 2006 Apr;38(4):444.e1-10. doi: 10.1016/j.jadohealth.2005.06.006.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 16549308 (View on PubMed)

Evans-Chase, M. (2014). Addressing trauma and psychosocial development in juvenile justice- involved youth: A synthesis of the developmental neuroscience, juvenile justice and trauma literature. Laws, 3(4), 744-758. DOI: 10.3390/laws3040744

Reference Type BACKGROUND

Ford, J. D., & Hawke, J. (2012). Trauma affect regulation psychoeducation group and milieu intervention outcomes in juvenile detention facilities. Journal of Aggression, Maltreatment & Trauma, 21(4), 365-384. https://doi.org/10.1080/10926771.2012.673538

Reference Type BACKGROUND

Forster M, Grigsby TJ, Rogers CJ, Benjamin SM. The relationship between family-based adverse childhood experiences and substance use behaviors among a diverse sample of college students. Addict Behav. 2018 Jan;76:298-304. doi: 10.1016/j.addbeh.2017.08.037. Epub 2017 Sep 1.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 28889058 (View on PubMed)

Fosco GM, Frank JL, Stormshak EA, Dishion TJ. Opening the "Black Box": family check-up intervention effects on self-regulation that prevents growth in problem behavior and substance use. J Sch Psychol. 2013 Aug;51(4):455-68. doi: 10.1016/j.jsp.2013.02.001. Epub 2013 Feb 26.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 23870441 (View on PubMed)

Frisman, L., Ford, J., Lin, H.-J., Mallon, S., & Chang, R. (2008). Outcomes of trauma treatment using the TARGET Model. https://doi.org/10.1080/15560350802424910

Reference Type BACKGROUND

Hovdestad, W. E., Tonmyr, L., Wekerle, C., & Thornton, T. (2011). Why is childhood maltreatment associated with adolescent substance abuse? A critical review of explanatory models. International Journal of Mental Health Addiction, 9(5), 525-542. DOI: 10.1007/s11469-011-9322-9

Reference Type BACKGROUND

Kumpfer KL, Alvarado R, Whiteside HO. Family-based interventions for substance use and misuse prevention. Subst Use Misuse. 2003 Sep-Nov;38(11-13):1759-87. doi: 10.1081/ja-120024240.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 14582577 (View on PubMed)

Laird RD, Pettit GS, Bates JE, Dodge KA. Parents' monitoring-relevant knowledge and adolescents' delinquent behavior: evidence of correlated developmental changes and reciprocal influences. Child Dev. 2003 May-Jun;74(3):752-68. doi: 10.1111/1467-8624.00566.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 12795388 (View on PubMed)

Marrow, M. T., Knudsen, K. J., Olafson, E., & Bucher, S. E. (2012). The value of implementing TARGET within a trauma-informed Juvenile Justice Setting. Journal of Child & Adolescent Trauma, 5(3), 257-270. DOI: 10.1080/19361521.2012.697105

Reference Type BACKGROUND

Murray, D. W., Rosanbalm, K., & Christopoulos, C. (2016, February). Self-Regulation and toxic stress report 3: A comprehensive review of self-regulation interventions from birth through young adulthood (OPRE Report # 2016-34). Washington, DC: Office of Planning, Research and Evaluation, Administration for Children and Families, U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. Retrieved February 14, 2019 from https://www.acf.hhs.gov/sites/default/files/opre/acf_report_3_approved_fromword_b508. pdf

Reference Type BACKGROUND

National Research Council (US) and Institute of Medicine (US) Committee on the Prevention of Mental Disorders and Substance Abuse Among Children, Youth, and Young Adults: Research Advances and Promising Interventions; O'Connell ME, Boat T, Warner KE, editors. Preventing Mental, Emotional, and Behavioral Disorders Among Young People: Progress and Possibilities. Washington (DC): National Academies Press (US); 2009. Available from http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK32775/

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 20662125 (View on PubMed)

Quinn K, Frueh BC, Scheidell J, Schatz D, Scanlon F, Khan MR. Internalizing and externalizing factors on the pathway from adverse experiences in childhood to non-medical prescription opioid use in adulthood. Drug Alcohol Depend. 2019 Apr 1;197:212-219. doi: 10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2018.12.029. Epub 2019 Feb 14.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 30849646 (View on PubMed)

Robertson AA, Xu X, Stripling A. Adverse events and substance use among female adolescent offenders: effects of coping and family support. Subst Use Misuse. 2010 Feb;45(3):451-72. doi: 10.3109/10826080903452512.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 20141458 (View on PubMed)

Shin SH, McDonald SE, Conley D. Patterns of adverse childhood experiences and substance use among young adults: A latent class analysis. Addict Behav. 2018 Mar;78:187-192. doi: 10.1016/j.addbeh.2017.11.020. Epub 2017 Nov 13.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 29179155 (View on PubMed)

Stein MD, Conti MT, Kenney S, Anderson BJ, Flori JN, Risi MM, Bailey GL. Adverse childhood experience effects on opioid use initiation, injection drug use, and overdose among persons with opioid use disorder. Drug Alcohol Depend. 2017 Oct 1;179:325-329. doi: 10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2017.07.007. Epub 2017 Aug 5.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 28841495 (View on PubMed)

Steinberg L. Risk taking in adolescence: what changes, and why? Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2004 Jun;1021:51-8. doi: 10.1196/annals.1308.005.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 15251873 (View on PubMed)

Taxman FS, Young DW, Fletcher BW. The National Criminal Justice Treatment Practices survey: an overview of the special issue. J Subst Abuse Treat. 2007 Apr;32(3):221-3. doi: 10.1016/j.jsat.2006.12.017. Epub 2007 Mar 9. No abstract available.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 17383547 (View on PubMed)

Texas Senate Bill 1356. (2013, September 1). About Texas Senate Bill 1356. Retrieved March 8, 2019 from https://www.crisisprevention.com/Blog/August-2013/Texas-Senate-Bill-1356?lang=en-US

Reference Type BACKGROUND

Tolou-Shams M, Brogan L, Esposito-Smythers C, Healy MG, Lowery A, Craker L, Brown LK. The role of family functioning in parenting practices of court-involved youth. J Adolesc. 2018 Feb;63:165-174. doi: 10.1016/j.adolescence.2017.12.016. Epub 2018 Jan 6.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 29310009 (View on PubMed)

Tolou-Shams M, Hadley W, Conrad SM, Brown LK. The Role of Family Affect in Juvenile Drug Court Offenders' Substance Use and HIV Risk. J Child Fam Stud. 2012 Jun 1;21(3):449-456. doi: 10.1007/s10826-011-9498-4. Epub 2011 May 6.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 22661883 (View on PubMed)

Wills, T. A., Sandy, J. M., Shinar, O., & Yaeger, A. (1999). Contributions of positive and negative affect to adolescent substance use: Test of a bidimensional model in a longitudinal study. Psychology of Addictive Behaviors, 13(4), 327-338. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0893-164X.13.4.327

Reference Type BACKGROUND

Wills TA, Sandy JM, Yaeger AM. Moderators of the relation between substance use level and problems: test of a self-regulation model in middle adolescence. J Abnorm Psychol. 2002 Feb;111(1):3-21.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 11866177 (View on PubMed)

Wolff KT, Baglivio MT, Piquero AR. The Relationship Between Adverse Childhood Experiences and Recidivism in a Sample of Juvenile Offenders in Community-Based Treatment. Int J Offender Ther Comp Criminol. 2017 Aug;61(11):1210-1242. doi: 10.1177/0306624X15613992. Epub 2015 Nov 12.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 26567183 (View on PubMed)

Wright, K. N., & Wright, K. E. (1993). Family life and delinquency and crime: A policymakers' guide to the literature (NCJ 140517). Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Justice, Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention, National Institute of Justice. Retrieved March 8, 2019 from https://www.ncjrs.gov/pdffiles1/Digitization/140517NCJRS.pdf

Reference Type BACKGROUND

Zolkoski, S. M., & Bullock, L. M. (2012). Resilience in children and youth: A review. Children and Youth Services Review, 34(12), 2295-2303. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.childyouth.2012.08.009

Reference Type BACKGROUND

Kuklinski MR, Gibbons BJ, Bowser DM, McCollister KE, Smart R, Dunlap LJ, Shenkar E, Bonar EE, Boomer T, Campbell M, Fiellin LE, Hutton DW, Rao V, Saldana L, Su K, Walton MA, Yilmazer T. Investing in Interventions to Prevent Opioid Use Disorder in Adolescents and Young Adults: Start-up Costs from NIDA's HEAL Prevention Initiative. Prev Sci. 2025 Oct 14. doi: 10.1007/s11121-025-01835-6. Online ahead of print.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 41085955 (View on PubMed)

Bowser D, McCollister K, Berchtold G, Ruscitti B, Yang Y, Hines H, Fardone E, Knight D. Start-Up and Implementation Costs for the Trust Based Relational Intervention. J Prev (2022). 2024 Dec;45(6):847-860. doi: 10.1007/s10935-024-00803-0. Epub 2024 Aug 17.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 39153158 (View on PubMed)

Razuri EB, Yang Y, Tinius E, Knight DK. Adaptation of a trauma-informed intervention to prevent opioid use among youth in the legal system. J Subst Use Addict Treat. 2024 Aug;163:209294. doi: 10.1016/j.josat.2024.209294. Epub 2024 Jan 24.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 38272116 (View on PubMed)

Razuri EB, Yang Y, Tinius E, Knight DK. Adaptation of a trauma-informed intervention for youth involved in the legal system. Res Sq [Preprint]. 2023 Mar 1:rs.3.rs-2596631. doi: 10.21203/rs.3.rs-2596631/v1.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 36909596 (View on PubMed)

Knight DK, Yang Y, Joseph ED, Tinius E, Young S, Shelley LT, Cross DR, Knight K. Preventing opioid use among justice-involved youth as they transition to adulthood: leveraging safe adults (LeSA). BMC Public Health. 2021 Nov 20;21(1):2133. doi: 10.1186/s12889-021-12127-3.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 34801009 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

UH3DA050250

Identifier Type: NIH

Identifier Source: org_study_id

View Link

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.