Application of High Power Radio Frequency Energy in the Ventricular Tachycardia Treatment

NCT ID: NCT04657705

Last Updated: 2023-01-30

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

119 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2020-12-05

Study Completion Date

2023-01-27

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Background: Patient's freedom from VT after RFA remains non-optimal and it depends on many factors. One of them is the effective reduction of the myocardium with RF energy during the operation. The standardization of the parameters of RF will help to increase the success of the procedure.

Hypothesis: Radiofrequency ablation of ventricular tachycardias with high power parameters has comparable safety and leads to greater efficacy (absence of ventricular tachycardias and all types of cardioverter-defibrillator therapies) in the long-term compared with ablation with standard parameters in patients with structural heart disease.

Purpose: to evaluate the safety and the efficiency of ablation of ventricular tachycardia in patients with structural heart disease using high power RF energy.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Background: Patient's freedom from VT after RFA remains non-optimal and it depends on many factors. One of them is the effective reduction of the myocardium with RF energy during the operation. The standardization of the parameters of RF will help to increase the success of the procedure.

Hypothesis: Radiofrequency ablation of ventricular tachycardias with high power parameters has comparable safety and leads to greater efficacy (absence of ventricular tachycardias and all types of cardioverter-defibrillator therapies) in the long-term compared with ablation with standard parameters in patients with structural heart disease.

Purpose: to evaluate the safety and the efficiency of ablation of ventricular tachycardia in patients with structural heart disease using high power RF energy.

Tasks:

1. To analyze the number of intraoperative complications in both groups
2. To evaluate the number of recurrent ventricular tachycardias and the number of episodes of CDI therapy in the long-term follow-up period
3. To estimate the time of onset of the first episode of VT and the overall burden of VT in the long-term follow-up period
4. To compare the total time of surgery, fluoroscopy, the number and total time of RF exposure, as well as the ablation index in relation to the "acute" and separated efficiency of ablation in the study groups
5. To estimate all-cause mortality in both groups
6. The number of repeated ablation for recurrent VT
7. The number of justified and unfounded CDI therapies
8. To analyze the long-term burden of antiarrhythmic therapy

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Ventricular Tachycardia Heart Diseases

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

High power ablation

High power ablation parameters (50-55 W)

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

High power ablation

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

High power ablation parameters (50-55 W)

Standard ablation power

Standard ablation power parameters (40-45 W)

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Standard ablation power

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Standard ablation power parameters (40-45 W)

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

High power ablation

High power ablation parameters (50-55 W)

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Standard ablation power

Standard ablation power parameters (40-45 W)

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

1. Patients after myocardial infarction (at least 3 months before enrollment in the study)
2. Stable, documented, monomorphic VT, confirmed by ECG and / or CMECG and / or EGM of any implanted device, having appropriate rhythm discrimination algorithms
3. Patients who have signed the informed consent

Exclusion Criteria

1. Acute myocardial ischemia
2. A reversible cause of VT (e.g. drug arrhythmia), recently(up to 30 days) suffered from acute coronary syndrome, coronary revascularization (\<90 days for bypass surgery, \<30 days for percutaneous coronary intervention), or having functional class IV angina.
3. Thrombosis of the left ventricle
4. Patients who have been implanted the mechanical prostheses in the aortic and mitral positions.
5. Patients who have been performed the catheter RFA for VT.
6. Renal failure (creatinine clearance \<15 ml / min),
7. Patients with NYHA functional class IV heart failure
8. Patients with a medical condition that may limit survival to less than 1 year
9. Patients with myocardial infarction with ST-segment elevation or MI without ST-segment elevation, transferred less than 30 days ago.
10. Patients who haven't signed the informed consent
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Meshalkin National Medical Research Center, Ministry of Health of Russian Federation

OTHER_GOV

Sponsor Role collaborator

Heart and Vascular Center Bad Bevensen, Germany

UNKNOWN

Sponsor Role collaborator

National Medical Research Center for Cardiology, Ministry of Health of Russian Federation

OTHER_GOV

Sponsor Role collaborator

National Research Center of Surgery, Russia

OTHER_GOV

Sponsor Role collaborator

I.M. Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

Texas Cardiac Arrhythmia Institute, Austin, Texas

UNKNOWN

Sponsor Role collaborator

Federal Research Clinical Center of Federal Medical & Biological Agency, Russia

OTHER_GOV

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Sergey V. Korolev, MD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Federal Research Clinical Center FMBA Russia

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Texas Cardiac Arrhythmia Institute

Austin, Texas, United States

Site Status

Heart and Vascular Center

Bad Bevensen, , Germany

Site Status

Federal Research Clinical Center of Federal Medical & Biological Agency

Moscow, , Russia

Site Status

National Medical Research Center of Surgery named after A. Vishnevsky

Moscow, , Russia

Site Status

I.M. Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University

Moscow, , Russia

Site Status

National Medical Research Center of Cardiology

Moscow, , Russia

Site Status

Meshalkin National Medical Research Center

Novosibirsk, , Russia

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United States Germany Russia

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

BURN VT

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.