Wellbeing After Stroke (WAterS): Supporting Adjustment and Wellbeing After Stroke

NCT ID: NCT04655937

Last Updated: 2024-05-10

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

PHASE1

Total Enrollment

20 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2021-01-05

Study Completion Date

2023-05-01

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Stroke survivors face a range of mental health challenges adjusting post-stroke. There is a lack of treatment options and clinical psychologist workforce to deliver support. Acceptance and Commitment Therapy (ACT) has been used successfully in clinical services to improve wellbeing.

The investigators worked with stroke survivors, health care professionals and researchers to co-develop group ACT therapy, specifically for stroke survivors, to be delivered using video calling (Zoom). Staff training and supervision programmes were also developed to equip Stroke Association workforce (paraprofessionals) to deliver ACT.

The current study will recruit and train up to 10 professionals with some experience of supporting stroke survivors but no experience of ACT.

We then aim to recruit up to 30 stroke survivors in the community who are at least 4 months post-stroke and experiencing distress adjusting to their stroke. The investigators aimed to make everything accessible for people with mild/moderate difficulties with thinking and communicating. Recruitment took place across England, over a 6 month period.

The study will test how feasible and acceptable it is to deliver the co-developed, remote ACT intervention to stroke survivors, as well as the feasibility of collecting outcomes data:

1. Participants will be invited to consent to complete online measures of well-being every 3 months for up to 12 months (taking around 20 minutes), with the option to participate in group intervention. Those who don't opt for groups will not be treated but will be followed up about their wellbeing, if they agree.
2. Those who opt to attend groups will be randomly assigned into intervention groups A, B, or C and receive the ACT intervention, involving 9 weekly sessions and homework.

Data will be collected on how successfully the groups are delivered and how acceptable they are / how to improve them, through online surveys, feedback questionnaires and interviews.

UPDATE May 2023: The investigators had initially intended to run an active comparator arm of social support and randomly allocated people to arms \*and\* groups. However, the design changed after the COVID-19 pandemic, meaning that the planning phases took longer than expected in order to pivot all study components to be deliverable online.

\*Please see references section for our findings and publications

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

UPDATE May 2023: The design changed after the COVID-19 pandemic meant that the planning phases took longer than expected in order to pivot all study components to be deliverable online. Changes are outlined below but to summarise: The study became an observational proof of principle feasibility study with no randomised attention control comparator arm, as was originally planned.

\*Please see references section for our findings and publications

Background: Stroke survivors face a range of mental health challenges during the adjustment process post-stroke. It is not always easy for stroke survivors to access treatment to help them face these challenges, due to the lack of interventions and access to clinical psychologists. Acceptance and Commitment Therapy (ACT) has good theoretical underpinning to support adjustment post stroke. The potential benefits of ACT may be further increased by group delivery.

The investigators have worked with stroke survivors, expert clinicians and researchers to develop an ACT intervention to be delivered remotely to groups, to support their adjustment and wellbeing post-stroke. The investigators have also developed a remote staff training and clinical supervision programme to equip professionals with no prior experience of ACT (Stroke Association coordinators) to deliver the intervention (typically an ACT intervention would be delivered by Clinical Psychologists).

Aims: The study aims to explore feasibility and acceptability of trained professionals delivering the adapted ACT intervention to stroke survivors in community settings in the context of a pilot study, with a potential no-treatment group (follow up only).

Methods: There are three work packages described that, whilst distinct, do overlap in terms of participants and timelines. All methods and study materials have been informed through collaboration with stroke survivors and carers through the WAterS Patient and Carer Public Involvement (PCPI) Research User Group (RUG):

* Work package 1 (staff training): remotely training paraprofessionals to deliver the remote ACT intervention. Through qualitative research and competency exercises, explore whether this equips staff with confidence and skills to deliver the study components.
* Work package 2 (pilot study): explore the acceptability of outcomes data collection separate to the acceptability of delivering remote group intervention and other study components. Eligible stroke survivors are recruited with baseline clinical and demographic information collected. They are invited to contribute self-report outcomes data about their psychological wellbeing, every three months for up to 12 months. Participant groups includes a no-treatment group, and a group that is invited to participate in the ACT intervention (9 short weekly sessions delivered by zoom). Stroke survivors attending intervention groups will be asked to complete additional self-report outcomes data in weeks 1 and weeks 9 of the groups.
* Work package 3 (process evaluation; runs in parallel with pilot trial): observation and filming of intervention group will facilitate monitoring of fidelity, as well as provide opportunities for paraprofessional facilitators to reflect on delivery and competency during ongoing clinical supervision. In addition, the acceptability of course content to stroke survivor attendees will be explored through postal or online feedback questionnaires and qualitative interviews.

Participants. Up to 10 professionals (Stroke Association Coordinators) with some experience of supporting stroke survivors and facilitating groups will be recruited for training in Work Package 1 and subsequent facilitation of groups. Professionals will be recruited from sites across England. For Work packages 2 and 3: up to 30 stroke survivors who are at least four months post-stroke and experiencing difficulties with adjustment and psychological distress will be recruited across the UK using a variety of methods to explore optimal recruitment routes over a 6 month period.

The study is underpinned by United Kingdom Medical Research Council (MRC) updated guidance on developing and evaluating complex interventions. MRC advises that feasibility work can uncover and explore problems of acceptability, compliance, delivery, recruitment and retention; and they recommend that process evaluations are embedded to increase understanding of the intervention and optimise its design and evaluation. At the feasibility stage, process evaluation is an active and iterative process, and changes can and should be made and acted upon while the trial is on-going. As such, the methodological principles are outlined in this record, but it is likely that some specifics may be adjusted as data are collected and learning is implemented.

All data (including recordings) will be handled in line with University of Manchester approved protocols and Study-specific Data Management Plan to ensure the safety and security of data.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Stroke Psychological Distress Cognitive Dysfunction Communication Disorders Psychological Adjustment

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

NON_RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

* Eligible Stroke Survivors are recruited and asked to a) provide self-reports on their wellbeing every 3 months for up to 12 months; b) opt in or out of invitation to group-based support.
* Those who consent only to a) form our COHORT arm who do not receive treatment.
* Those who consent to both a) and b) form our INTERVENTION group. When sufficient numbers are recruited, they are offered the intervention (Acceptance and Commitment Therapy group) Groups are delivered over 9 weekly sessions and involve homework.

This description was updated in May 2023 but to confirm: no active comparator / attention control arm (as originally plan) was included in the actual study
Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

NONE

* Participants attend the group if they agree to invitation and accept.
* Staff / Care providers are trained and cannot be masked
* Key outcomes are provided through self-report data from participants and therefore cannot be masked.

Other outcomes - related to acceptability and feasibility - are collected by the research team. The research team is small and funding is minimal so we cannot mask the research team.

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

non-randomised no treatment arm

Participants who do not opt in to group support will only provide self-report data on their wellbeing and quality of life every 3 months for up to 12 months. Data collected through online survey platforms using validated questionnaires

Group Type NO_INTERVENTION

No interventions assigned to this group

Acceptance and Commitment Therapy (ACT) Group

Only those who opt in to group support will be invited and allocated into treatment groups at random. Participants in this arm will be invited to 9 weekly ACT-informed therapy sessions involving core values identification, mindfulness practices and committed action plans. There will be homework in between sessions.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Acceptance and Commitment Therapy

Intervention Type OTHER

9 x two hour remote sessions (50 minutes activity + 20 minute break + 50 minutes activity). Acceptance and Commitment Therapy (ACT) is a third wave transdiagnostic cognitive-behavioural therapy that supports clients to adjust to current experiences and 'commit' to behaviours that are congruent with their personal values, in order to promote psychological well-being and prevent future mental health crisis. ACT uses a variety of experiential techniques to support this process including: mindfulness practices; exercises to identify personal values; commitment to goals for valued living.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Acceptance and Commitment Therapy

9 x two hour remote sessions (50 minutes activity + 20 minute break + 50 minutes activity). Acceptance and Commitment Therapy (ACT) is a third wave transdiagnostic cognitive-behavioural therapy that supports clients to adjust to current experiences and 'commit' to behaviours that are congruent with their personal values, in order to promote psychological well-being and prevent future mental health crisis. ACT uses a variety of experiential techniques to support this process including: mindfulness practices; exercises to identify personal values; commitment to goals for valued living.

Intervention Type OTHER

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Exclusion Criteria

1. Adults in the UK (at least 18 years old)
2. At least 4 months post-stroke (no upper limit);
3. Who identify as having unmet needs in terms of psychological adjustment to stroke and psychological distress. Since exploring eligibility criteria is an aim of this feasibility study, self-report of these symptoms will be sufficient for inclusion. Participants who identify as severely anxious or depressed (or at risk of harm) are likely to be excluded from this research, with information on referral to more appropriate expert psychological support will be provided.
4. Sufficient English language to engage in groups / complete measures
5. Ability to engage in remote group interventions. The groups will be designed to include those who have traditionally been excluded from work like this e.g. those with cognitive and/or communicative difficulties. However, it is important to highlight that this is not an intervention designed for severe issues in these areas. We will aim to include all participants who self-report a willingness and ability to engage in the research, using the required technologies.

Ultimately, we aim to be as inclusive as possible for this study as there are many novel components of the research that we are exploring in terms of feasibility and acceptability. The data collected during the feasibility study describing sample characteristics, acceptability and outcomes may inform formal cut offs to be used in an eventual phase III RCT.
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

The Stroke Association, United Kingdom

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

University of Manchester

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Dr Emma Patchwood

Research Fellow

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Emma Patchwood, PhD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

University of Manchester

Audrey Bowen, PhD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

University of Manchester

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

University of Manchester

Manchester, , United Kingdom

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United Kingdom

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Patchwood E, Foote H, Vail A, Cotterill S, Hill G; WAterS PCPI Group; Bowen A. Wellbeing After Stroke (WAterS): Feasibility Testing of a Co-developed Acceptance and Commitment Therapy Intervention to Support Psychological Adjustment After Stroke. Clin Rehabil. 2024 Jul;38(7):979-989. doi: 10.1177/02692155241239879. Epub 2024 Mar 20.

Reference Type RESULT
PMID: 38505946 (View on PubMed)

Related Links

Access external resources that provide additional context or updates about the study.

https://www.youtube.com/@watersstudy

YouTube channel where interested parties can listen to and read a lay-friendly report on study findings

https://research.manchester.ac.uk/en/persons/emma.patchwood

Dr Emma Patchwood (Chief Investigator) Research profile

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

IRAS ID: 287785

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

Clinic and Neurophysiology of Aphasia Treatment
NCT05572385 NOT_YET_RECRUITING NA
Mindfulness After Stroke
NCT04553679 COMPLETED
VR-ACT After Stroke: a Feasibility Study
NCT06990646 NOT_YET_RECRUITING NA