Non-Invasive Brain Stimulation for the Treatment of Parkinson´s Disease-related Pain

NCT ID: NCT04651699

Last Updated: 2023-01-26

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

22 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2021-05-03

Study Completion Date

2023-01-23

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Pain is an under-reported but prevalent symptom in Parkinson´s Disease (PD), impacting patients' quality of life. Both pain and PD conditions cause cortical excitability reduction, but non-invasive brain stimulation is thought to be able to counteract it, resulting also effective in chronic pain conditions. The investigators in the present project aim to evaluate the efficacy of a novel brain stimulation protocol in the management of pain in PD patients during the ON state. The investigators hypothesize that active transcranial direct current stimulation (a-tDCS) over the Primary Motor Cortex (M1) can improve clinical pain and its central processing features.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Parkinson´s Disease (PD) affects between 4.1 and 4.6 million people in the world. Diagnosis of PD is currently clinical and based on its motor manifestations (bradykinesia, rest tremor, and rigidity). However, non-motor symptoms such as pain, fatigue and neuropsychiatric manifestations are present in more than 70% of subjects. Pain affects about 85% of patients but is paradoxically under-reported and consequently under-treated in PD patients with a great impact on their quality of life. Levodopa, which is the election treatment in PD, has shown controversial results regarding pain sensitivity and has been shown ineffective for enhancing the endogenous pain modulation system. Furthermore, there is a lack of management protocols and nonpharmacologic treatments for pain in PD. Several syndromes are hypothesized to be involved in PD pain generation. Generally, PD patients suffer from alterations in peripheral transmission, sensitive-discriminative processing, pain perception, and pain interpretation in multiple levels, due to neurodegenerative changes in dopaminergic pathways and non-dopaminergic pain-related structures. Therefore, central mechanisms are proposed to be crucial for the development and establishment of pain in PD patients. Regarding pain processing features, PD patients have reduced pain thresholds, an augmented Temporal Summation (TS) after repetitive nociceptive stimulus, and the impairment of their Conditioned Pain Modulation (CPM) is correlated with greater severity and premature onset of the disease. Cortical excitability reduction is common in patients with pain. Therefore, diverse therapies are being developed to counteract this cortical excitability reduction and obtaining, consequently, effective pain relief. In consonance with these findings, in PD condition, especially in off state, there is also evidence of cortical excitability decrease but, to the best of the investigators´ knowledge, there are no studies targeting cortical excitability to treat pain in PD. Thus, the present study proposes non-invasive brain stimulation therapy for the treatment of PD-related pain. The non-invasive brain stimulation therapy will be transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) over the Primary Motor Cortex (M1). tDCS over M1 is capable of increase corticospinal excitability in both M1 and other pain processing-related areas such as the thalamus, Dorsolateral Prefrontal Cortex (DLPFC), cingulate cortex, and insula, also involved in PD pain processing. These increments of cortical excitability have been correlated with pain relief in chronic pain such as fibromyalgia, osteoarthritis, migraine, and spinal cord injury. It is also hypothesized that tDCS would be an effective strategy to treat central sensitivity-related pain, a process whose features are common with PD condition. Moreover, specifically in PD, tDCS over M1 has shown to increase cortical excitability, augmenting the Motor Evoked Potential (MEP) amplitude by 78.5%, correlating with motor improvements. The main aim of this study is to conduct an independent parallel randomized controlled trial based on tDCS targeting changes in 1. validated general and specific PD related pain scales and 2. psychophysical measurements of pain modulation mechanisms. The investigators´ main hypothesis is that active tDCS will be superior to its respective control placebo intervention.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Parkinson Disease Pain

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

This study will be a triple-blinded experimental longitudinal prospective randomized controlled trial with a parallel design. The randomization will be realized through the "GraphPad" software by an independent investigator. All the participants who fulfill the inclusion criteria and have none of the exclusion ones will be randomly allocated into two groups: active-tDCS (a-tDCS) or sham-tDCS (s-tDCS). Allocation concealment will be ensured by the inclusion of the assigned group in closed opaque envelopes that will be opened at the time of the intervention.
Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

QUADRUPLE

Participants Caregivers Investigators Outcome Assessors
Triple-blind criteria will be achieved by identic collocation of the electrodes in both groups and by activating the "double-blind" option in the Starstim tDCS® Software (Neuroelectrics Inc, Barcelona, Spain) that allows concealing the protocol by writing a neutral number. The evaluator, not allowed to stay in the same room while interventions, will conceal the protocols with the neutral number and the therapist will read it in the envelope, ignoring which number coincides with each intervention. At the end of the full treatment, patients will be asked whether they received active or sham stimulation, to assess the blinding success. Patients recruited will not meet in waiting rooms to avoid them to comment on their experience during the protocol. The statistician will be also blinded through the mentioned neutral numbers. Unblinding will be permissible when any event could suppose a risk for the patient's health.

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Active Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation

Active Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation (a-tDCS) will be applied over the Primary Motor Cortex during 10 sessions of 20 minutes at 2 milli amps.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Active Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation

Intervention Type DEVICE

The Starstim tDCS® stimulator will be used by an experienced physical therapist to transfer direct current by a saline-soak pair of surface sponge electrodes (35cm2). The anode electrode will be placed over C3 (EEG 10/20 system) and the cathode electrode over the contralateral supraorbital area (Fp2), in order to enhance the excitability of M1 (32). Regarding the stimulated hemisphere, contralateral M1 will be stimulated in patients with asymmetric pain and the dominant (contrary to the dominant hand determined by the Edinburgh Handedness Inventory) in patients with symmetric pain, due to the widespread changes induced by tDCS in other cortical areas, including contralateral M1. A constant current of 2 milli amps intensity (subthreshold intensity) will be applied for 20 min, with 30 seconds of ramp-up and 30 seconds of ramp-down.

Sham Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation

Sham Transcranial Direct Current (s-tDCS) will be applied over the Primary Motor Cortex during 10 sessions of 20 minutes.

Group Type SHAM_COMPARATOR

Sham Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation

Intervention Type DEVICE

The electrodes will be placed in the same positions as for M1 stimulation, but only applying ramping active current for 30 seconds in the beginning and at the end of the procedure for a reliable blinding.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Active Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation

The Starstim tDCS® stimulator will be used by an experienced physical therapist to transfer direct current by a saline-soak pair of surface sponge electrodes (35cm2). The anode electrode will be placed over C3 (EEG 10/20 system) and the cathode electrode over the contralateral supraorbital area (Fp2), in order to enhance the excitability of M1 (32). Regarding the stimulated hemisphere, contralateral M1 will be stimulated in patients with asymmetric pain and the dominant (contrary to the dominant hand determined by the Edinburgh Handedness Inventory) in patients with symmetric pain, due to the widespread changes induced by tDCS in other cortical areas, including contralateral M1. A constant current of 2 milli amps intensity (subthreshold intensity) will be applied for 20 min, with 30 seconds of ramp-up and 30 seconds of ramp-down.

Intervention Type DEVICE

Sham Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation

The electrodes will be placed in the same positions as for M1 stimulation, but only applying ramping active current for 30 seconds in the beginning and at the end of the procedure for a reliable blinding.

Intervention Type DEVICE

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Neuroimaging study without previous pathologies.
* Score \> 5 in transfers (bed to chair and back) item in Barthel Index.
* Score = or \> 24 in Mini-Mental State Examination.
* Tolerability for the application of electrotherapy.
* Able to provide informed consent to participate in the study.

Exclusion Criteria

* Neurologic disease different from PD.
* Pain non-related to PD.
* Dermatologic problems, wounds, or ulcers in the electrode's application area.
* Presence of implants or metal pieces in the head.
* Presence of cardiac pacemaker, vagal, brain or transcutaneous stimulators, medication pumps, ventriculoperitoneal shunts or aneurysm clips.
* Significative difficulties in language.
* History of alcohol or drugs abuse.
* Non-controlled medical problems.
* Pregnancy.
* Epilepsy.
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Universidad Rey Juan Carlos

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

Hospital Beata María Ana

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

Universidad Francisco de Vitoria

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Juan Pablo Romero Muñoz, MD PhD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Universidad Francisco de Vitoria, Facultad de Ciencias Experimentales

Josué Fernandez Carnero, PT PhD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Universidad Rey Juan Carlos

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Hospital Beata Maria Ana

Madrid, , Spain

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Spain

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Kalia LV, Lang AE. Parkinson's disease. Lancet. 2015 Aug 29;386(9996):896-912. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(14)61393-3. Epub 2015 Apr 19.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 25904081 (View on PubMed)

Silverdale MA, Kobylecki C, Kass-Iliyya L, Martinez-Martin P, Lawton M, Cotterill S, Chaudhuri KR, Morris H, Baig F, Williams N, Hubbard L, Hu MT, Grosset DG; UK Parkinson's Pain Study Collaboration. A detailed clinical study of pain in 1957 participants with early/moderate Parkinson's disease. Parkinsonism Relat Disord. 2018 Nov;56:27-32. doi: 10.1016/j.parkreldis.2018.06.001. Epub 2018 Jun 6.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 29903584 (View on PubMed)

Antonini A, Tinazzi M, Abbruzzese G, Berardelli A, Chaudhuri KR, Defazio G, Ferreira J, Martinez-Martin P, Trenkwalder C, Rascol O. Pain in Parkinson's disease: facts and uncertainties. Eur J Neurol. 2018 Jul;25(7):917-e69. doi: 10.1111/ene.13624. Epub 2018 Apr 18.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 29520899 (View on PubMed)

Lefaucheur JP, Antal A, Ayache SS, Benninger DH, Brunelin J, Cogiamanian F, Cotelli M, De Ridder D, Ferrucci R, Langguth B, Marangolo P, Mylius V, Nitsche MA, Padberg F, Palm U, Poulet E, Priori A, Rossi S, Schecklmann M, Vanneste S, Ziemann U, Garcia-Larrea L, Paulus W. Evidence-based guidelines on the therapeutic use of transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS). Clin Neurophysiol. 2017 Jan;128(1):56-92. doi: 10.1016/j.clinph.2016.10.087. Epub 2016 Oct 29.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 27866120 (View on PubMed)

Fregni F, Boggio PS, Santos MC, Lima M, Vieira AL, Rigonatti SP, Silva MT, Barbosa ER, Nitsche MA, Pascual-Leone A. Noninvasive cortical stimulation with transcranial direct current stimulation in Parkinson's disease. Mov Disord. 2006 Oct;21(10):1693-702. doi: 10.1002/mds.21012.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 16817194 (View on PubMed)

Fregni F, Boggio PS, Lima MC, Ferreira MJ, Wagner T, Rigonatti SP, Castro AW, Souza DR, Riberto M, Freedman SD, Nitsche MA, Pascual-Leone A. A sham-controlled, phase II trial of transcranial direct current stimulation for the treatment of central pain in traumatic spinal cord injury. Pain. 2006 May;122(1-2):197-209. doi: 10.1016/j.pain.2006.02.023. Epub 2006 Mar 27.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 16564618 (View on PubMed)

Chaudhuri KR, Rizos A, Trenkwalder C, Rascol O, Pal S, Martino D, Carroll C, Paviour D, Falup-Pecurariu C, Kessel B, Silverdale M, Todorova A, Sauerbier A, Odin P, Antonini A, Martinez-Martin P; EUROPAR and the IPMDS Non Motor PD Study Group. King's Parkinson's disease pain scale, the first scale for pain in PD: An international validation. Mov Disord. 2015 Oct;30(12):1623-31. doi: 10.1002/mds.26270. Epub 2015 Jun 11.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 26096067 (View on PubMed)

Perez-Lloret S, Ciampi de Andrade D, Lyons KE, Rodriguez-Blazquez C, Chaudhuri KR, Deuschl G, Cruccu G, Sampaio C, Goetz CG, Schrag A, Martinez-Martin P, Stebbins G; Members of the MDS Committee on Rating Scales Development. Rating Scales for Pain in Parkinson's Disease: Critique and Recommendations. Mov Disord Clin Pract. 2016 Jun 24;3(6):527-537. doi: 10.1002/mdc3.12384. eCollection 2016 Nov-Dec.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 30363588 (View on PubMed)

Imai Y, Petersen KK, Morch CD, Arendt Nielsen L. Comparing test-retest reliability and magnitude of conditioned pain modulation using different combinations of test and conditioning stimuli. Somatosens Mot Res. 2016 Sep-Dec;33(3-4):169-177. doi: 10.1080/08990220.2016.1229178. Epub 2016 Sep 20.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 27650216 (View on PubMed)

Santos-Garcia D, Oreiro M, Perez P, Fanjul G, Paz Gonzalez JM, Feal Painceiras MJ, Cores Bartolome C, Valdes Aymerich L, Garcia Sancho C, Castellanos Rodrigo MDM. Impact of Coronavirus Disease 2019 Pandemic on Parkinson's Disease: A Cross-Sectional Survey of 568 Spanish Patients. Mov Disord. 2020 Oct;35(10):1712-1716. doi: 10.1002/mds.28261. Epub 2020 Sep 22.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 32776601 (View on PubMed)

Gonzalez-Zamorano Y, Jose Sanchez-Cuesta F, Moreno-Verdu M, Arroyo-Ferrer A, Fernandez-Carnero J, Chaudhuri KR, Fieldwalker A, Romero JP. TDCS for parkinson's disease disease-related pain: A randomized trial. Clin Neurophysiol. 2024 May;161:133-146. doi: 10.1016/j.clinph.2024.01.011. Epub 2024 Feb 28.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 38479239 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

PainPD-tDCS

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

STEM-Parkinson's Disease
NCT04797611 COMPLETED NA
Deep Brain Stimulation and Parkinson's Disease
NCT02795663 COMPLETED EARLY_PHASE1