Real-World Safety Analysis of Paclitaxel Devices Used for the Treatment of Peripheral Arterial Disease
NCT ID: NCT04647643
Last Updated: 2022-02-14
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
8000 participants
OBSERVATIONAL
2020-11-20
2021-12-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Safety Assessment of Femoropopliteal Endovascular Treatment With PAclitaxel-coated Devices (SAFE-PAD Study)
NCT04496544
VISION and VQI Paclitaxel Safety Analysis
NCT04204564
VQI DELTA Paclitaxel Device Safety Analysis
NCT04110288
The DETECT Project
NCT05254106
Local Paclitaxel Delivery to Prevent Restenosis in Peripheral Arterial Disease
NCT03858764
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
This study aims to evaluate the relative safety of paclitaxel used as an antiproliferative agent in the treatment of symptomatic PAD in a real-world scenario. We will analyze Paclitaxel Drug-Coated Balloons (DCB) and Paclitaxel Drug-Eluting Stents (DES), in aggregate and as unique exposures using propensity score-matched survival analysis. (Inverse probability of Treatment Weighting).
Commercial claims of patients who underwent endovascular interventional treatment of the femoral or popliteal arteries for symptomatic PAD between 1/1/15 and 12/31/2019 will form the study population. Three separate safety analyses will be performed. 1. Paclitaxel Drug coated balloons (DCB) as compared with propensity-matched patients treated with plain transluminal balloon angioplasty (PTA). 2. Paclitaxel delivering Drug-Eluting Stents (DES) as compared with propensity-matched cases using bare-metal stents (BMS). 3. Patients treated with either paclitaxel DCB or paclitaxel DES (any PTX) compared with propensity-matched controls (non-PTX,with DCB patients, matched to patients treated with PTA, and DES patients matched to patients treated with BMS).
All proposed analyses will be performed using R 4.01 implemented within the DELTA analytic engine. DELTA is an active surveillance safety system that can monitor clinical data repositories for safety signals and has been validated to support risk-adjusted prospective safety surveillance analyses of complex clinical datasets.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
COHORT
RETROSPECTIVE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Paclitaxel Drug Coated Balloon
Patients treated with paclitaxel drug-coated balloon
Paclitaxel
Paclitaxel to treat peripheral arterial disease
Paclitaxel Drug Coated Stent
Patients treated with paclitaxel drug-coated stent
Paclitaxel
Paclitaxel to treat peripheral arterial disease
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Paclitaxel
Paclitaxel to treat peripheral arterial disease
Other Intervention Names
Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Presence of at least one additional outpatient or inpatient claims, at least 12 months following the index procedure, in order to demonstrate continued enrollment in health insurance coverage.
Exclusion Criteria
* No qualifying peripheral arterial endovascular procedure
* Inpatient procedure
* Patients without any linked claim record more than 12 months after the index procedure, not known to have died or entered hospice care within the first 12 months
18 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
National Evaluation System for health Technology Coordinating Center
OTHER
Society for Vascular Surgery Patient Safety Organization
OTHER
Lahey Clinic
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Sourbha Dani
Staff Cardiologist
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Sourbha S Dani, MD, MSc
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Lahey Hospital & Medical Center
Frederic S Resnic, MD, MSc
Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR
Lahey Hospital & Medical Center
Robbert Zusterzeel, MD, MPH, PhD
Role: STUDY_CHAIR
NESTcc
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Lahey Clinic, Inc
Burlington, Massachusetts, United States
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Dake MD, Ansel GM, Jaff MR, Ohki T, Saxon RR, Smouse HB, Zeller T, Roubin GS, Burket MW, Khatib Y, Snyder SA, Ragheb AO, White JK, Machan LS; Zilver PTX Investigators. Paclitaxel-eluting stents show superiority to balloon angioplasty and bare metal stents in femoropopliteal disease: twelve-month Zilver PTX randomized study results. Circ Cardiovasc Interv. 2011 Oct 1;4(5):495-504. doi: 10.1161/CIRCINTERVENTIONS.111.962324. Epub 2011 Sep 27.
Dake MD, Ansel GM, Jaff MR, Ohki T, Saxon RR, Smouse HB, Snyder SA, O'Leary EE, Tepe G, Scheinert D, Zeller T; Zilver PTX Investigators. Sustained safety and effectiveness of paclitaxel-eluting stents for femoropopliteal lesions: 2-year follow-up from the Zilver PTX randomized and single-arm clinical studies. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2013 Jun 18;61(24):2417-2427. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2013.03.034. Epub 2013 Apr 10.
Katsanos K, Spiliopoulos S, Kitrou P, Krokidis M, Karnabatidis D. Risk of Death Following Application of Paclitaxel-Coated Balloons and Stents in the Femoropopliteal Artery of the Leg: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials. J Am Heart Assoc. 2018 Dec 18;7(24):e011245. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.118.011245.
Rocha-Singh KJ, Duval S, Jaff MR, Schneider PA, Ansel GM, Lyden SP, Mullin CM, Ioannidis JPA, Misra S, Tzafriri AR, Edelman ER, Granada JF, White CJ, Beckman JA; VIVA Physicians, Inc. Mortality and Paclitaxel-Coated Devices: An Individual Patient Data Meta-Analysis. Circulation. 2020 Jun 9;141(23):1859-1869. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.119.044697. Epub 2020 May 6.
Secemsky EA, Kundi H, Weinberg I, Jaff MR, Krawisz A, Parikh SA, Beckman JA, Mustapha J, Rosenfield K, Yeh RW. Association of Survival With Femoropopliteal Artery Revascularization With Drug-Coated Devices. JAMA Cardiol. 2019 Apr 1;4(4):332-340. doi: 10.1001/jamacardio.2019.0325.
Secemsky EA, Kundi H, Weinberg I, Schermerhorn M, Beckman JA, Parikh SA, Jaff MR, Mustapha J, Rosenfield K, Yeh RW. Drug-Eluting Stent Implantation and Long-Term Survival Following Peripheral Artery Revascularization. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2019 May 28;73(20):2636-2638. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2019.02.020. Epub 2019 Mar 1. No abstract available.
Behrendt CA, Sedrakyan A, Peters F, Kreutzburg T, Schermerhorn M, Bertges DJ, Larena-Avellaneda A, L'Hoest H, Kolbel T, Debus ES. Editor's Choice - Long Term Survival after Femoropopliteal Artery Revascularisation with Paclitaxel Coated Devices: A Propensity Score Matched Cohort Analysis. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2020 Apr;59(4):587-596. doi: 10.1016/j.ejvs.2019.12.034. Epub 2020 Jan 8.
Resnic FS, Gross TP, Marinac-Dabic D, Loyo-Berrios N, Donnelly S, Normand SL, Matheny ME. Automated surveillance to detect postprocedure safety signals of approved cardiovascular devices. JAMA. 2010 Nov 10;304(18):2019-27. doi: 10.1001/jama.2010.1633.
Kumar A, Matheny ME, Ho KK, Yeh RW, Piemonte TC, Waldman H, Shah PB, Cope R, Normand SL, Donnelly S, Robbins S, Resnic FS. The data extraction and longitudinal trend analysis network study of distributed automated postmarket cardiovascular device safety surveillance. Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes. 2015 Jan;8(1):38-46. doi: 10.1161/CIRCOUTCOMES.114.001123. Epub 2014 Dec 9.
Resnic FS, Majithia A. Registry-Based Surveillance of Medical-Device Safety. N Engl J Med. 2017 May 18;376(20):1995. doi: 10.1056/NEJMc1704006. No abstract available.
Hsieh FY, Lavori PW, Cohen HJ, Feussner JR. An overview of variance inflation factors for sample-size calculation. Eval Health Prof. 2003 Sep;26(3):239-57. doi: 10.1177/0163278703255230.
Vidi VD, Matheny ME, Resnic FS. Post-marketing device safety surveillance. Contemp Clin Trials. 2011 May;32(3):307-8. doi: 10.1016/j.cct.2011.02.002. Epub 2011 Feb 28. No abstract available.
Austin PC. Optimal caliper widths for propensity-score matching when estimating differences in means and differences in proportions in observational studies. Pharm Stat. 2011 Mar-Apr;10(2):150-61. doi: 10.1002/pst.433.
Related Links
Access external resources that provide additional context or updates about the study.
McKeown L. Two trials halted in wake of study linking paclitaxel-coated devices to deaths in PAD
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
6292-2020-2AS-1001-Phase1
Identifier Type: OTHER_GRANT
Identifier Source: secondary_id
20203069FH
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.