Depth of Maximal Ileal Insertion During Retrograde Enteroscopy With TTS Balloon
NCT ID: NCT04646083
Last Updated: 2025-06-18
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
RECRUITING
100 participants
OBSERVATIONAL
2021-01-14
2025-12-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Insertion depth can be calculated during the withdrawal of the enteroscope. The Aim of the study: To compare the depth of maximal ileal insertion between through-the-scope balloon enteroscopy (NaviAid) with enteroscopy using the adult colonoscope (Olympus CF-190) alone, in the same patient, in a prospective cohort at University Medical Center of El Paso, Texas.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Assessing Depth of Small Bowel Insertion at Push Enteroscopy by Using Capsule Endoscopy
NCT05731388
Evaluation the Performance of Given Diagnostic System in Detection of Bleeding Events in the Small Bowel
NCT01441219
Role of AI in CE for the Identification of SB Lesions in Patients With Small Intestinal Bleeding.
NCT04821349
Performance Evaluation of the NaviCam SB Capsule Endoscope System for the Diagnosis of Small Bowel Diseases
NCT05086471
Multicenter Study Comparing AI-Based Navicam vs. Conventional Pillcam in Small Bowel Pathology
NCT06462352
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Depth of insertion is correlated with diagnostic yield, meaning that we would like to ascertain if the use of the colonoscope with NaviAid will result in greater depth of insertion and potentially more findings of small bowel abnormalities than using a colonoscope alone.
It is assumed that this is the case, but we want to show it and quantify it.
HYPOTHESIS:
The depth of ileal insertion is greater with the use of through-the-scope balloon enteroscopy (NaviAid) when compared with enteroscopy using the standard adult colonoscope (Olympus CF-190) alone.
OBJECTIVE:
To compare the depth of maximal ileal insertion between through-the-scope balloon enteroscopy (NaviAid) with the adult colonoscope (Olympus CF-190) alone, in the same patient, in a prospective cohort at University Medical Center of El Paso, Texas.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
COHORT
PROSPECTIVE
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
2. Patients age between 18-90 years
3. Patients in which retrograde enteroscopy is indicated for any of the following:
abnormal video capsule endoscopy non-diagnostic upper and lower endoscopy obscure gastrointestinal bleeding iron deficiency anemia non-diagnostic upper endoscopy and abnormal CT Hemodynamically stable
Exclusion Criteria
2. Pregnancy and breast feeding
3. Prior colon resection
4. Patients with known strictures
5. Patients with altered anatomy
6. Inadequate bowel preparation.
18 Years
90 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Texas Tech University Health Sciences Center, El Paso
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Marc Zuckerman
Professor of Medicine
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Marc J Zuckerman, MD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Texas Tech University Health Sciences Center
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Texas Tech University Health Science Center El Paso
El Paso, Texas, United States
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Central Contacts
Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.
Facility Contacts
Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
E20147
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.