Comparison of Ultrasound-guided Bilateral ESP Block and Wound Infiltration for Spinal Surgical Analgesia

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Total Enrollment

75 participants

Study Classification

OBSERVATIONAL

Study Start Date

2021-04-01

Study Completion Date

2022-12-01

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The aim of our study is to determine the superior procedure in analgesia management by comparing the traditional wound infiltration technique with the ultrasound-guided bilateral erector spina plan block technique in spinal surgery patients.

Related Clinical Trials

Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.

Ultrasound-guided ESP Block vs. Wound Infiltration in Lumbar Surgery: A Comparative Analysis (ESP:Erector Spinae Plane)

NCT06567964

Lumbar Spinal Stenosis Lumbar Spine Instability Lumbar Spine Degeneration

COMPLETED NA

USG Guided ESP Block in Spinal Surgery

NCT04148729

Postoperative Pain

COMPLETED PHASE4

Erector Spinae Plane Block Versus Serratus Anterior Plane Block

NCT06862752

Post Operative Pain Opioid-Related Disorders

COMPLETED NA

Comparison of Thoracic Epidural Analgesia and Intercostal Blockade in Patients Undergoing Thoracotomy

NCT03721250

Analgesia, Postoperative

COMPLETED

Ultrasound Guided Erector Spinae Plane Block

NCT06657092

Breast Diseases

COMPLETED NA

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Patients in ASA I-II-III risk group aged 18-80 who will undergo spinal surgery by Trakya University Faculty of Medicine, Brain and Nerve Surgery will be included. In this study, patient data will be collected in the form of file scanning. Intra-operative; hemodynamic data of patients; heart rate, blood pressure values, anesthetic and other drugs applied, surgery and anesthesia durations will be written from the anesthesia document after the operation is over. In the study, the application preferred by the anesthesiologist for the patient will not be intervened. The patients will be divided into three groups; wound infiltration technique was applied, ultrasound-guided bilateral erector spina plan block technique was applied and both techniques were applied together. After the operation; pain values will be calculated by VAS at the 1st, 2nd, 4th, 6th, 12th and 24th hours of the patients. The patient's length of stay, satisfaction (excellent, good, moderate, poor) and methods used for analgesia will be recorded. With the results collected in our study, it will be determined which procedure is superior in pain management for spine surgery.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Pain, Postoperative Spinal Disease Anesthesia, Local Anesthesia, Regional

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Observational Model Type

OTHER

Study Time Perspective

PROSPECTIVE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

wound infiltration analgesia

25 patients who underwent wound infiltration analgesia

Visual Analog Score

Intervention Type OTHER

The VAS is a widely used tool in research and clinical practice, and its reliability and validity in pain assessment has been clearly demonstrated. It consists of a 100 mm line. 0 cm no pain, 10 cm is associated with 'worst possible pain'. The patient is asked to mark the line to 'score' the pain. VAS values of 1cm - 3cm weak, 4cm - 6cm moderate, and \>7cm are the indicators of "severe pain".

patient satisfaction

Intervention Type OTHER

The patient's satisfaction with postoperative pain treatment will be recorded. 4 options; excellent, good, medium and bad.

ultrasound-guided bilateral erector spina plan block analgesia

25 patients who underwent ultrasound-guided bilateral erector spina plan block analgesia

Visual Analog Score

Intervention Type OTHER

The VAS is a widely used tool in research and clinical practice, and its reliability and validity in pain assessment has been clearly demonstrated. It consists of a 100 mm line. 0 cm no pain, 10 cm is associated with 'worst possible pain'. The patient is asked to mark the line to 'score' the pain. VAS values of 1cm - 3cm weak, 4cm - 6cm moderate, and \>7cm are the indicators of "severe pain".

patient satisfaction

Intervention Type OTHER

The patient's satisfaction with postoperative pain treatment will be recorded. 4 options; excellent, good, medium and bad.

wound infiltration and ultrasound-guided bilateral erector spina plan block analgesia both together

25 patients who underwent wound infiltration and ultrasound-guided bilateral erector spina plan block analgesia

Visual Analog Score

Intervention Type OTHER

The VAS is a widely used tool in research and clinical practice, and its reliability and validity in pain assessment has been clearly demonstrated. It consists of a 100 mm line. 0 cm no pain, 10 cm is associated with 'worst possible pain'. The patient is asked to mark the line to 'score' the pain. VAS values of 1cm - 3cm weak, 4cm - 6cm moderate, and \>7cm are the indicators of "severe pain".

patient satisfaction

Intervention Type OTHER

The patient's satisfaction with postoperative pain treatment will be recorded. 4 options; excellent, good, medium and bad.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Visual Analog Score

The VAS is a widely used tool in research and clinical practice, and its reliability and validity in pain assessment has been clearly demonstrated. It consists of a 100 mm line. 0 cm no pain, 10 cm is associated with 'worst possible pain'. The patient is asked to mark the line to 'score' the pain. VAS values of 1cm - 3cm weak, 4cm - 6cm moderate, and \>7cm are the indicators of "severe pain".

Intervention Type OTHER

patient satisfaction

The patient's satisfaction with postoperative pain treatment will be recorded. 4 options; excellent, good, medium and bad.

Intervention Type OTHER

Other Intervention Names

Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.

VAS

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Undergoing elective spine surgery
* No contraindication to the technique to be applied
* Not pregnant
* Being over the age of 18

Exclusion Criteria

* Undergoing emergency spine surgery
* There is an obstacle to the technical process to be applied
* Pregnant patients
* Patients younger than 18 years old

Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

80 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No