Trunk Control Tests in Post-stroke Context: Validity and Reliability Study

NCT ID: NCT04639453

Last Updated: 2021-03-30

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Total Enrollment

32 participants

Study Classification

OBSERVATIONAL

Study Start Date

2019-06-01

Study Completion Date

2021-03-29

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Context:

After stroke, most patients suffer from hemiparesis with variable functional consequences that can strongly impact autonomy in daily activities. Motor recovery is, therefore, an essential part of the therapeutic strategy in order to optimize the patient's capacities and functional autonomy.

Some authors suggest that trunk control would be essential in the capacities of standing balance, transfer tasks and gait. However, no studies have tested the reliability and validity of proprioceptive and sitting balance clinical tests for patients with post-stroke hemiparesis. These tests would be very useful in advancing our understanding of trunk impairments and for clinicians to manage an appropriate treatment strategy.

Objective:

The main objective is to assess the reliability of the Trunk Positional Sense Test, the unstable sitting test with forceplate and the Modified Functional Reach Test (MFRT) in individuals with post-stroke hemiparesis. The secondary objectives is 1) to assess the validity of the Trunk Positional Sense Test and the unstable sitting test with forceplate, 2) to assess the validity of a phone inertial captors to assess the instable sitting.

Method. - Thirty-two individuals with subacute post-stroke hemiparesis will be included in this study. After clinical tests (trunk strength, Balance Assessment in Standing and Sitting, Timed Up and Go test), the MFRT, Trunk Positional Sense Test and unstable sitting will be evaluated by two physiotherapists in a first session (inter-rater reliability). After a rest of 2-4 h, a second similar session was conducted with the first physiotherapist (intra-rater reliability). For unstable seated balance, two tools will be used: the force platform and a smartphone.

Reliability will be tested by calculating the intraclass correlation (ICC) and Bland-Altman analysis. For trunk positional sense test and unstable sitting test, the validity will be tested with correlations with each clinical test. The validity, between forceplate variables and inertial phone variables, will be tested with correlations.

Perspectives. - The promotion of quality tests to assess patients in clinical practice is essential. The results of this study should provide knowledge for selecting the best trunk control tests to assess the individuals after stroke and to understand the influence of trunk control on functional activities.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Stroke

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Observational Model Type

OTHER

Study Time Perspective

PROSPECTIVE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Stroke

Individuals with post-stroke hemiparesis in subacute phase will be included in the study.

Trunk strength with hand-held dynamometer

Intervention Type DIAGNOSTIC_TEST

MicroFET 2 Handheld Dynamometer is a force evaluation testing device to evaluate the strength of various trunk muscle groups in flexion, extension, and lateral (N).

Balance Assessment in Sitting and Standing test (BASS)

Intervention Type DIAGNOSTIC_TEST

The BASS is a test to assess static and dynamic sitting and standing balance, which has been validated for post-stroke hemiparetic patients. Each test is evaluated by a score from "0" (patient needs external support) to "4" (stable without external help) for static condition and from "0" (no possibility to pick up objects) to "3" (objects picked up without external help) for dynamic condition. The maximal score (sitting, standing, static and dynamic) is 14 points.

Timed Up and Go test

Intervention Type DIAGNOSTIC_TEST

The participant sits on a chair, gets up, walks 3m, makes a half turn in 1m2, walks 3m and comes back to sit on the chair. The time (s) to complete the task is measured.

Modified Functional Reach Test (MFRT)

Intervention Type DIAGNOSTIC_TEST

The MFRT is a dynamic seated balance test that measures the trunk's ability to move forward, to the paretic and non paretic side (cm).

Joint Position sense test (trunk)

Intervention Type DIAGNOSTIC_TEST

The joint positional sense test of the trunk consists in evaluating the positional error of the trunk in the sagittal plane (mm) and in the frontal plane (mm) during a trunk flexion posture (target position).

Unstable sitting in a seesaw

Intervention Type DIAGNOSTIC_TEST

This test evaluates the balance capacities of the subject in an unstable sitting position on a seesaw (mediolateral or anteroposterior instability) with forceplate and phone application using center of pressure variables: total displacement (mm), area (mm2), deltas (mm), mean velocity (mm/s) et maximal velocity (mm/s).

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Trunk strength with hand-held dynamometer

MicroFET 2 Handheld Dynamometer is a force evaluation testing device to evaluate the strength of various trunk muscle groups in flexion, extension, and lateral (N).

Intervention Type DIAGNOSTIC_TEST

Balance Assessment in Sitting and Standing test (BASS)

The BASS is a test to assess static and dynamic sitting and standing balance, which has been validated for post-stroke hemiparetic patients. Each test is evaluated by a score from "0" (patient needs external support) to "4" (stable without external help) for static condition and from "0" (no possibility to pick up objects) to "3" (objects picked up without external help) for dynamic condition. The maximal score (sitting, standing, static and dynamic) is 14 points.

Intervention Type DIAGNOSTIC_TEST

Timed Up and Go test

The participant sits on a chair, gets up, walks 3m, makes a half turn in 1m2, walks 3m and comes back to sit on the chair. The time (s) to complete the task is measured.

Intervention Type DIAGNOSTIC_TEST

Modified Functional Reach Test (MFRT)

The MFRT is a dynamic seated balance test that measures the trunk's ability to move forward, to the paretic and non paretic side (cm).

Intervention Type DIAGNOSTIC_TEST

Joint Position sense test (trunk)

The joint positional sense test of the trunk consists in evaluating the positional error of the trunk in the sagittal plane (mm) and in the frontal plane (mm) during a trunk flexion posture (target position).

Intervention Type DIAGNOSTIC_TEST

Unstable sitting in a seesaw

This test evaluates the balance capacities of the subject in an unstable sitting position on a seesaw (mediolateral or anteroposterior instability) with forceplate and phone application using center of pressure variables: total displacement (mm), area (mm2), deltas (mm), mean velocity (mm/s) et maximal velocity (mm/s).

Intervention Type DIAGNOSTIC_TEST

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Post stroke
* Subacute phase
* Able to stay stable in sitting position during 30 seconds
* Medical stability
* Able to understand the consign (Mini-Mental State Examination \>22)

Exclusion Criteria

* Medical complications
* Hearing disorders
* Previous pathologies associated with spinal disorders
* Back pain
Minimum Eligible Age

50 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

80 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

University Hospital, Geneva

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

Anne-Violette Bruynnel

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Anne-Violette Bruynnel

Professor (assistant)

Responsibility Role SPONSOR_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Anne-Violette Bruyneel, PhD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

School of Health Sciences Geneva

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Hôpitaux Universitaires de Genève (Hôpital Beau-Séjour)

Geneva, , Switzerland

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Switzerland

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Han J, Waddington G, Adams R, Anson J, Liu Y. Assessing proprioception: A critical review of methods. J Sport Health Sci. 2016 Mar;5(1):80-90. doi: 10.1016/j.jshs.2014.10.004. Epub 2015 Feb 3.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 30356896 (View on PubMed)

Jung K, Kim Y, Chung Y, Hwang S. Weight-shift training improves trunk control, proprioception, and balance in patients with chronic hemiparetic stroke. Tohoku J Exp Med. 2014 Mar;232(3):195-9. doi: 10.1620/tjem.232.195.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 24646921 (View on PubMed)

Katz-Leurer M, Fisher I, Neeb M, Schwartz I, Carmeli E. Reliability and validity of the modified functional reach test at the sub-acute stage post-stroke. Disabil Rehabil. 2009;31(3):243-8. doi: 10.1080/09638280801927830.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 18608433 (View on PubMed)

Learman KE, Benedict JA, Ellis AR, Neal AR, Wright JA, Landgraff NC. An exploration of trunk reposition error in subjects with acute stroke: An observational design. Top Stroke Rehabil. 2016 Jun;23(3):200-7. doi: 10.1080/10749357.2016.1138671. Epub 2016 Feb 5.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 27077979 (View on PubMed)

Morishita M, Amimoto K, Matsuda T, Arai Y, Yamada R, Baba T. Analysis of dynamic sitting balance on the independence of gait in hemiparetic patients. Gait Posture. 2009 Jun;29(4):530-4. doi: 10.1016/j.gaitpost.2008.12.005. Epub 2009 Jan 9.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 19138521 (View on PubMed)

Oh DS, Choi JD. The effect of motor imagery training for trunk movements on trunk muscle control and proprioception in stroke patients. J Phys Ther Sci. 2017 Jul;29(7):1224-1228. doi: 10.1589/jpts.29.1224. Epub 2017 Jul 15.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 28744053 (View on PubMed)

Ryerson S, Byl NN, Brown DA, Wong RA, Hidler JM. Altered trunk position sense and its relation to balance functions in people post-stroke. J Neurol Phys Ther. 2008 Mar;32(1):14-20. doi: 10.1097/NPT.0b013e3181660f0c.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 18463551 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

83589

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

Physiotherapy/hypnosis for AVC Patients
NCT06885294 ENROLLING_BY_INVITATION NA