Chronic Pain Diagnosis and Treatment in Torture Survivors

NCT ID: NCT04629963

Last Updated: 2026-01-22

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

RECRUITING

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

100 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2021-01-14

Study Completion Date

2026-01-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The goal Aim 1 of this investigation is to characterize the diagnosis of chronic pain in torture survivors. The investigators hypothesize that using a validated pain screen to supplement the existing United Nations Istanbul Protocol can improve the ability to detect pain from 15% to 90% in this study population. Investigators will test this hypothesis by conducting a prospective, blind comparison to gold standard study. The goal of Aim 2 is to evaluate the acceptability of somatic pain treatment using qualitative interviews of torture survivors. The goal of Aim 3 is to assess the feasibility of recruiting and retaining participants in a digital pain program over six months.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

The objective of this application is to improve the diagnosis and treatment of chronic pain in torture survivors. The central hypothesis, based on strong preliminary data from 25 subjects from the Weill Cornell Center for Human Rights, is that the novel application in torture survivors of a validated pain screen, the Brief Pain Inventory Short Form (BPISF), can supplement the United Nations Istanbul Protocol (UNIP) and improve its sensitivity for pain from 15% to 90%, as compared to the gold standard (a pain specialist). The rationale for the investigation is to improve the diagnosis of pain in torture survivors, leading to targeted treatment.

The objectives of this study are to improve the diagnosis of pain in torture survivors with the novel utilization in this population of a pain screen. The findings of this study also have implications for other populations that experience complex trauma such as veterans, prisoners of war, and sexual violence survivors.

The primary objective of the qualitative interview portion is to gain an understanding of how participants perceive, react to, and might utilize somatic pain treatment. We aim to qualitatively assess the challenges and acceptability of a proposed, evidence-based somatic pain treatment model, novel in its implementation in torture survivors: physical therapy and/or non-opioid analgesics and/or trigger point injections. We will use the Gelberg and Andersen Behavioral Model of Health Care Utilization for Vulnerable Populations as a conceptual framework to conduct qualitative interviews with 30 participants purposively sampled from Study Aim 1. Data with regard to acceptability and practicality from interviews will be used to adapt our proposed evidence-based somatic pain treatment for torture survivors.

The primary objective of Aim 3 is to answer critical questions on the feasibility of a subsequent clinical trial to treat somatic pain in torture survivors. As a secondary objective, we will analyze the prevalence of migration stress, pain, and cardiovascular disease, and their relationship over time, in refugee torture survivors. The primary objective of this sub-study is the recruitment, retention, and adherence of participants to the digital program over a six-month period. The secondary objectives of this sub-study are the assessment of pain, mental health status, trauma history, migration stress, and cardiovascular risk factors and diseases.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Pain Pain, Chronic

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

NON_RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

SINGLE_GROUP

Investigators will enroll participants from human rights centers and compare the diagnostic ability of the United Nations Istanbul Protocol (UNIP) alone to the UNIP plus a validated pain screen (BPISF), both against the gold standard for pain assessment (pain specialist exam). Participants will complete individual interviews during which we will present our somatic pain treatment model and receive feedback on challenges, limitations, and acceptability of the interventions. A feasibility sub-study will be conducted with the primary outcome being recruitment and retention of participants over a 6-month period. Secondary outcomes include analysis of study visit data (i.e. migration stress, pain, cardiovascular) collected at enrollment and again after 6 months. Digital and biometric data will be collected continuously from a study-provided smartphone application and wearable fitness device for up to 6 months.
Primary Study Purpose

SCREENING

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Aim 1: Pain Evaluation

Participants will complete the validated pain questionnaire, the Brief Pain Inventory Short Form (BPISF). Participants will receive a non-invasive physical exam and pain assessment by a pain specialist.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Pain Evaluation and BPISF

Intervention Type OTHER

Current diagnostic approaches guide evaluators to use the United Nations Istanbul Protocol (UNIP) for the assessment of torture survivors. The proposed investigation offers a novel diagnostic paradigm by which participants are evaluated by the UNIP and a validated pain screen (Brief Pain Inventory Short Form).

Aim 2: Qualitative Interview

Participants will complete individual interviews moderated by the research staff. Interviews will be based on the guide but will be minimally structured to facilitate exploration of novel topics as raised by participants and to ensure information-rich data on topics of interest. Individual interviews will be \~30-45 minutes in length, conducted in the subject's primary language with the use of an interpreter as appropriate. All interviews will be audio-recorded with participants' permission, transcribed, and translated into English for analysis.

Group Type NO_INTERVENTION

No interventions assigned to this group

Aim 3: Enrollment in a digital program assessing stress, pain, and cardiovascular health

Continuous cardiovascular, stress, and pain data collection will occur for 6 months after enrollment. Biometric data including continuous heart rate, actigraphy, sleep, and derived physiological parameters will be collected using the wearable device. Pain and stress evaluations will be administered via a smartphone app as a survey of stress, pain, or cardiovascular symptoms.

Participants will complete surveys assessing chronic pain, mental health, trauma history, migration stress, and cardiovascular risk factors and disease Total cholesterol, HDL, LDL, triglycerides, and glucose will be measured using a lipid analyzer with a fingerstick blood sample. Height, weight, and blood pressure will also be measured.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Surveys, a fingerstick blood sample, EMAs, and a digital wearable device

Intervention Type OTHER

The following surveys: BPI-SF, RHS-15, RTHC, SOIS-SF, RPMS, WHOAQ, QVSFS, a fingerstick blood sample, EMAs, and a digital wearable device

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Pain Evaluation and BPISF

Current diagnostic approaches guide evaluators to use the United Nations Istanbul Protocol (UNIP) for the assessment of torture survivors. The proposed investigation offers a novel diagnostic paradigm by which participants are evaluated by the UNIP and a validated pain screen (Brief Pain Inventory Short Form).

Intervention Type OTHER

Surveys, a fingerstick blood sample, EMAs, and a digital wearable device

The following surveys: BPI-SF, RHS-15, RTHC, SOIS-SF, RPMS, WHOAQ, QVSFS, a fingerstick blood sample, EMAs, and a digital wearable device

Intervention Type OTHER

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* ≥ 18 years old
* Survived torture as defined by the World Medical Association
* Consented to being contacted by our research team


* ≥ 18 years old
* Survived torture as defined by the World Medical Association
* Chronic pain as per Aim 1 findings


* ≥ 18 years old
* Survived torture as defined by the World Medical Association
* Chronic pain as per Aim 1 findings
* Personal smartphone

Exclusion Criteria

* Non-tortured refugees seeking asylum through T visas (trafficking), U visas (victims of violence in the US), Violence Against Women Act (VAMA), and Special Immigrant Juveniles (SIJ)
* Pregnant women

(Aim 2)


* Non-tortured refugees seeking asylum through T visas (trafficking), U visas (victims of violence in the US), Violence Against Women Act (VAMA), and Special Immigrant Juveniles (SIJ)
* Pregnant women


* Non-tortured refugees seeking asylum through T visas (trafficking), U visas (victims of violence in the US), Violence Against Women Act (VAMA), and Special Immigrant Juveniles (SIJ)
* Pregnant women
* Planned move within 6 months
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

National Institutes of Health (NIH)

NIH

Sponsor Role collaborator

National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (NINDS)

NIH

Sponsor Role collaborator

Weill Medical College of Cornell University

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Gunisha Kaur, MA, MD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Weill Medical College of Cornell University

Claudia Hatef, BS

Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR

Weill Medical College of Cornell University

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Bellevue/New York University Program for Survivors of Torture

New York, New York, United States

Site Status ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING

Mount Sinai Human Rights Program

New York, New York, United States

Site Status ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING

Columbia University Human Rights Initiative and Asylum Clinic

New York, New York, United States

Site Status NOT_YET_RECRUITING

Weill Cornell Medicine

New York, New York, United States

Site Status RECRUITING

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United States

Central Contacts

Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.

Gunisha Kaur, MA, MD

Role: CONTACT

(212) 746-2461

Michele Steinkamp, RN

Role: CONTACT

2127462953

Facility Contacts

Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.

Michael Devlin, MD

Role: primary

(212) 305-6001

Gunisha Kaur, BA, MD

Role: primary

(212) 746-2461

Michele Steinkamp, RN

Role: backup

2127462953

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

1K23NS116114-01A1

Identifier Type: NIH

Identifier Source: secondary_id

View Link

20-10022730

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

Pain Related Variables
NCT06007443 COMPLETED NA