Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
NA
1206 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2021-04-05
2025-07-11
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Pilates and the Pelvic Floor: A Quasi-experimental Study
NCT04431102
Maternal Positioning to Correct Fetal Occiput Posterior
NCT05307393
Descriptive Evaluation of Expulsive Efforts During Pregnancy in Term Nulliparous Women by Measurement of Intra Bladder Pressure: Pilot Observational Study.
NCT04544488
Maternal Maneuvers During Prolonged Labor
NCT06636149
Early Diagnosis and Intervention for Fetal Malposition in Active Labor and Its Impact on Mode of Delivery
NCT05881629
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
In addition to lacking data with respect to patient positioning, data is limited regarding perineal morbidity beyond the traditional grading system of 1st, 2nd, 3rd, and 4th degree tears. 3rd and 4th degree lacerations are labeled as OASIS, however, perineal morbidity can result from "lower" orders of perineal tearing at the time of delivery. Prior studies have tried to illustrate various subsets of second degree lacerations in an attempt to subdivide 2nd degree lacerations into categories of severity, however, little has been done in practice with this form of division and little is written on the topic of perineal morbidity beyond OASIS tears.
It is common practice for practitioners to instruct patients to flex the hips at the time of delivery of the fetal vertex. Though this is commonplace, it is reasonable to assume that this stretching of the perineum at the time of fetal vertex emergence could potentially lead to higher rates of severe lacerations and their sequelae. The closest studies to examine this have been in comparing women who deliver in the squatting position compared to in lithotomy. Those who deliver in squatting positions have been found to have deeper perineal lacerations, which demonstrate the possibility that forced flexion at the hips could lead to the same outcome in the lithotomy position. Should research show an increased risk of morbidity with this near universal positioning practice as compared to hip extension, this study could change practice patterns for the betterment of patients worldwide.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
PREVENTION
SINGLE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Usual care
Patients in this arm will be randomized to the routine positioning instructions given at the time of crowning of the fetal vertex during vaginal delivery.
Usual Care
Hips positioned in the "usual care" position per provider preference at the time of vaginal delivery
Hip extension
Patients in this arm will be randomized to hip extension at the time of crowning of the fetal vertex during vaginal delivery.
Hip extension
Hips extended at the time of vaginal delivery
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Hip extension
Hips extended at the time of vaginal delivery
Usual Care
Hips positioned in the "usual care" position per provider preference at the time of vaginal delivery
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Non-anomalous fetuses
* Term gestation
* Vertex presentation
* Eligible for trial of labor
Exclusion Criteria
* Prior perineal malformations
* History female genital mutilation
* Prior perineal surgery
* Anomalous fetuses
* Multiple gestations
* Fetal status incompatible with labor
18 Years
55 Years
FEMALE
Yes
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Massachusetts General Hospital
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
William H. Barth, Jr., MD
Vice Chair, Obstetrics (Chief of Obstetrics)
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Marti D Soffer, MD MPH
Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR
Massachusetts General Hospital
William H Barth, MD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Massachusetts General Hospital
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Massachusetts General Hospital
Boston, Massachusetts, United States
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
2020P003603
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.