The Patient Positioning for Perineal Protection Study

NCT ID: NCT04616170

Last Updated: 2025-07-17

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

1206 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2021-04-05

Study Completion Date

2025-07-11

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

It is common practice for practitioners to instruct patients to forcibly flex the hips at the time of delivery of the fetal vertex. Though this is commonplace, it is reasonable to assume that this forced stretching of the perineum at the time of fetal vertex emergence could potentially lead to higher rates of severe lacerations and their sequelae. This study will examine whether extending the hips, as compared to usual care, at the time of crowning of the fetal vertex during vaginal delivery decreases maternal perineal trauma among nulliparous women.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Perineal trauma at the time of vaginal delivery is a significant cause of maternal morbidity including vaginal pain, dyspareunia, urinary incontinence, infection, and social isolation in severe cases. There are well known risk factors in the literature for OASIS (obstetric anal sphincter injuries), however, this literature is by no means comprehensive. A prior RCT in 2012 looked at the role of patient positioning at the time of pushing and delivery to determine whether stirrup positioning and forced hip flexion leads to higher rates of any perineal tears. The study concluded that stirrup positioning did not lead to higher rates of perineal tearing but was not powered to evaluate the role of positioning on OASIS tears or on postpartum perineal morbidity.

In addition to lacking data with respect to patient positioning, data is limited regarding perineal morbidity beyond the traditional grading system of 1st, 2nd, 3rd, and 4th degree tears. 3rd and 4th degree lacerations are labeled as OASIS, however, perineal morbidity can result from "lower" orders of perineal tearing at the time of delivery. Prior studies have tried to illustrate various subsets of second degree lacerations in an attempt to subdivide 2nd degree lacerations into categories of severity, however, little has been done in practice with this form of division and little is written on the topic of perineal morbidity beyond OASIS tears.

It is common practice for practitioners to instruct patients to flex the hips at the time of delivery of the fetal vertex. Though this is commonplace, it is reasonable to assume that this stretching of the perineum at the time of fetal vertex emergence could potentially lead to higher rates of severe lacerations and their sequelae. The closest studies to examine this have been in comparing women who deliver in the squatting position compared to in lithotomy. Those who deliver in squatting positions have been found to have deeper perineal lacerations, which demonstrate the possibility that forced flexion at the hips could lead to the same outcome in the lithotomy position. Should research show an increased risk of morbidity with this near universal positioning practice as compared to hip extension, this study could change practice patterns for the betterment of patients worldwide.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Perineal Tear Delivery; Trauma Perineal Laceration

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Patients will be assigned to usual care or hip extension at the time of delivery of the fetal vertex
Primary Study Purpose

PREVENTION

Blinding Strategy

SINGLE

Outcome Assessors
The statistician performing the primary analysis will be blinded to the assignment of the patients

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Usual care

Patients in this arm will be randomized to the routine positioning instructions given at the time of crowning of the fetal vertex during vaginal delivery.

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Usual Care

Intervention Type OTHER

Hips positioned in the "usual care" position per provider preference at the time of vaginal delivery

Hip extension

Patients in this arm will be randomized to hip extension at the time of crowning of the fetal vertex during vaginal delivery.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Hip extension

Intervention Type OTHER

Hips extended at the time of vaginal delivery

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Hip extension

Hips extended at the time of vaginal delivery

Intervention Type OTHER

Usual Care

Hips positioned in the "usual care" position per provider preference at the time of vaginal delivery

Intervention Type OTHER

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Nulliparous women
* Non-anomalous fetuses
* Term gestation
* Vertex presentation
* Eligible for trial of labor

Exclusion Criteria

* Multiparous women
* Prior perineal malformations
* History female genital mutilation
* Prior perineal surgery
* Anomalous fetuses
* Multiple gestations
* Fetal status incompatible with labor
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

55 Years

Eligible Sex

FEMALE

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Massachusetts General Hospital

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

William H. Barth, Jr., MD

Vice Chair, Obstetrics (Chief of Obstetrics)

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Marti D Soffer, MD MPH

Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR

Massachusetts General Hospital

William H Barth, MD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Massachusetts General Hospital

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Massachusetts General Hospital

Boston, Massachusetts, United States

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United States

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

2020P003603

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

Pitocin or Oral Misoprostol for PROM IOL
NCT04028765 COMPLETED PHASE4
Perineal Massage Using A Pelvic Wand During Pregnancy
NCT06986824 NOT_YET_RECRUITING PHASE4
Effectiveness of ACS in Extreme Preemies
NCT02351310 WITHDRAWN PHASE3