Pitocin or Oral Misoprostol for PROM IOL

NCT ID: NCT04028765

Last Updated: 2024-04-30

Study Results

Results available

Outcome measurements, participant flow, baseline characteristics, and adverse events have been published for this study.

View full results

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

PHASE4

Total Enrollment

108 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2019-08-12

Study Completion Date

2023-01-08

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Premature rupture of membranes (PROM) is a common occurrence of pregnancies at term. A delay from PROM to labor is associated with an increased risk of intrauterine infection and associated maternal and fetal morbidity; therefore, induction of labor (IOL) is recommended. The ideal agent for IOL is not known, particularly among specific subpopulations. The primary aim of this study is to determine if oxytocin (Pitocin) or oral misoprostol results in a shorter interval to delivery after the start of induction among nulliparous women with unfavorable cervical exams with term PROM.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Premature rupture of membranes (PROM) occurs in approximately 8% of pregnancies at term.1 Although onset of spontaneous labor is often prompt after membrane rupture, a delay from PROM to labor is associated with an increased risk of intrauterine infection and its associated maternal and fetal complications. For this reason, the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists (ACOG) endorses induction of labor for PROM "if spontaneous labor does not occur near the time of presentation."

The optimal method for PROM induction is less clear. Prior literature has examined the use of Pitocin (Oxytocin), vaginal and oral misoprostol, and dinoprost with mixed results. The TermPROM study found an increased risk of chorioamnionitis and Neonatal Intensive Care Unit (NICU) admission among women treated with vaginal misoprostol for induction.

The postulated link between vaginal misoprostol and chorioamnionitis is the need for vaginal examination for placement of the misoprostol; more vaginal examinations could potentially increase the risk for infection. Utilizing oral misoprostol would eliminate the need for a vaginal exam for administration, thereby potentially mitigating this risk of infection. Currently, vaginal and oral misoprostol as well as oxytocin are used routinely in clinical care based on provider discretion.

Among 7 randomized controlled trials examining the use of oral misoprostol as compared to oxytocin, two found oral misoprostol to result in faster induction to delivery, two found oxytocin to result in faster deliveries, and the remaining three found no difference between the two.3-9 These studies are limited by small sample size, inadequate reporting of patient demographics, varied misoprostol and oxytocin protocols, and inconsistent primary outcomes. Therefore, the utility of oral misoprostol in this population has not been established. Furthermore, its efficacy in specific patient populations is unreported in the literature.

The primary aim of this study is to determine if oxytocin or oral misoprostol results in a shorter interval to delivery after the start of induction among nulliparous women with unfavorable cervical exams with PROM.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

PROM

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Oral Misoprostol

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Misoprostol

Intervention Type DRUG

Oral misoprostol 50 mcg every 4 hours for up to 6 doses or until cervical ripening is no longer indicated

Oxytocin

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Oxytocin

Intervention Type DRUG

IV Oxytocin 2 milliunits (mU)/min, increased by 2mU/min q15 minutes per hospital protocol

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Misoprostol

Oral misoprostol 50 mcg every 4 hours for up to 6 doses or until cervical ripening is no longer indicated

Intervention Type DRUG

Oxytocin

IV Oxytocin 2 milliunits (mU)/min, increased by 2mU/min q15 minutes per hospital protocol

Intervention Type DRUG

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* English Speaking
* PROM \</= 24 hours with no evidence of labor
* \>/= 36 weeks gestation
* Agreeable to induction of labor
* Nulliparous
* Singleton pregnancy
* Vertex presentation
* Cervical dilation \</=2 cm AND Bishop score \< 8

Exclusion Criteria

* Prior cesarean section
* Other contraindication to vaginal delivery
* Intrauterine Fetal Demise
* Major Congenital Anomaly
* Intraamniotic infection diagnosed at time of admission
* 36 weeks - 36 weeks and 6 days with unknown Group B Strep (GBS) status
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

FEMALE

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

University of Pennsylvania

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Lisa Levine

Assistant Professor

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania

Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United States

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Committee on Practice Bulletins-Obstetrics. ACOG Practice Bulletin No. 188: Prelabor Rupture of Membranes. Obstet Gynecol. 2018 Jan;131(1):e1-e14. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000002455.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 29266075 (View on PubMed)

Hannah ME, Ohlsson A, Farine D, Hewson SA, Hodnett ED, Myhr TL, Wang EE, Weston JA, Willan AR. Induction of labor compared with expectant management for prelabor rupture of the membranes at term. TERMPROM Study Group. N Engl J Med. 1996 Apr 18;334(16):1005-10. doi: 10.1056/NEJM199604183341601.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 8598837 (View on PubMed)

Al-Hussaini TK, Abdel-Aal SA, Youssef MA. Oral misoprostol vs. intravenous oxytocin for labor induction in women with prelabor rupture of membranes at term. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2003 Jul;82(1):73-5. doi: 10.1016/s0020-7292(03)00136-x. No abstract available.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 12834947 (View on PubMed)

Crane JM, Delaney T, Hutchens D. Oral misoprostol for premature rupture of membranes at term. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2003 Sep;189(3):720-4. doi: 10.1067/s0002-9378(03)00768-3.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 14526301 (View on PubMed)

Butt KD, Bennett KA, Crane JM, Hutchens D, Young DC. Randomized comparison of oral misoprostol and oxytocin for labor induction in term prelabor membrane rupture. Obstet Gynecol. 1999 Dec;94(6):994-9. doi: 10.1016/s0029-7844(99)00423-8.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 10576189 (View on PubMed)

Ngai SW, Chan YM, Lam SW, Lao TT. Labour characteristics and uterine activity: misoprostol compared with oxytocin in women at term with prelabour rupture of the membranes. BJOG. 2000 Feb;107(2):222-7. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-0528.2000.tb11693.x.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 10688506 (View on PubMed)

Mozurkewich E, Horrocks J, Daley S, Von Oeyen P, Halvorson M, Johnson M, Zaretsky M, Tehranifar M, Bayer-Zwirello L, Robichaux A 3rd, Droste S, Turner G; MisoPROM study. The MisoPROM study: a multicenter randomized comparison of oral misoprostol and oxytocin for premature rupture of membranes at term. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2003 Oct;189(4):1026-30. doi: 10.1067/s0002-9378(03)00845-7.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 14586349 (View on PubMed)

Mbaluka CM, Kamau K, Karanja JG, Mugo N. EFFECTIVENESS AND SAFETY OF 2-HOURLY 20 MCG ORAL MISOPROSTOL SOLUTION COMPARED TO STANDARD INTRAVENOUS OXYTOCIN IN LABOUR INDUCTION DUE TO PRE-LABOUR RUPTURE OF MEMBRANES AT TERM: A RANDOMISED CLINICAL TRIAL AT KENYATTA NATIONAL HOSPITAL. East Afr Med J. 2014 Sep;91(9):303-10.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 26866082 (View on PubMed)

Provided Documents

Download supplemental materials such as informed consent forms, study protocols, or participant manuals.

Document Type: Study Protocol and Statistical Analysis Plan

View Document

Document Type: Informed Consent Form

View Document

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

833536

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

Different Medications to Induce Labor
NCT06259097 RECRUITING PHASE3