Improving Implementation of Evidence-based Approaches and Surveillance to Prevent Bacterial Transmission and Infection

NCT ID: NCT04600973

Last Updated: 2025-12-03

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

RECRUITING

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

6000 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2021-07-01

Study Completion Date

2026-06-30

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Surgical site infections (SSIs) are associated with increased patient morbidity, mortality, and healthcare costs. ESKAPE (Enterococcus, S. aureus, Klebsiella, Acinetobacter, Pseudomonas, and Enterobacter spp.) pathogens are particularly pathogenic because they have increased capacity to acquire resistance and virulence traits. The investigators have proven that a multifaceted program involving improved basic perioperative preventive measures can generate substantial reductions in S. aureus transmission and significant reductions in SSIs (88% reduction as compared to usual care). In this study, the investigators aim to examine the relative effectiveness of each component of this program in controlling ESKAPE transmission and reducing SSIs and to identify an optimal implementation strategy for national dissemination. Randomization occurs at the site level, and sites adopt preventative programs. This work will improve perioperative patient safety for the 51 million patients who undergo surgery each year.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

The investigators propose to test the implementation of a multifaceted, evidence-based, peri-operative surgical site infection (SSI) preventive program that leverages basic preventive measures optimized by pathogen cluster detection software (surveillance) to reduce ESKAPE (Enterococcus, S. aureus, Klebsiella, Acinetobacter, Pseudomonas, and Enterobacter spp.) transmission and SSIs. SSIs increase patient morbidity, prolong hospitalization, and increase the risk of death. ESKAPE pathogens are particularly problematic because they have increased capacity to acquire resistance and virulence traits. For example, S. aureus explains a significant proportion of SSIs. S. aureus transmission can be detected in 39% of surgical cases, has been directly linked to up to 50% of S. aureus SSIs by single nucleotide variant analysis, and is tightly associated with SSI development across a variety of surgical specialties. The isolation of ≥ 1 KAPE isolate from ≥ 1 intraoperative reservoir is associated with increased risk of infection development. The investigators have proven that improvements in basic perioperative preventive measures can generate substantial and sustained reductions in perioperative S. aureus transmission and SSIs, with the magnitude of the effect exceeding that of SSI preventive efforts focused on host optimization and inhibition of bacterial virulence strategies, the status quo. However, perioperative application of these basic preventive measures has been inconsistent, and some evidence suggests that S. aureus explains 20% of SSIs. Thus, there remains room for further advancement in perioperative infection control by addressing other ESKAPE organisms and by delineating an implementation approach that will yield effective, national dissemination of these proven measures. The investigators planned approach to address these pathogens mirrors our approach for perioperative S. aureus control, integrating evidence-based provider hand hygiene, intravascular catheter design/handling, environmental cleaning/organization, and patient decolonization improvement strategies with surveillance. The investigators surveillance approach maps the epidemiology of transmission of each pathogen, identifying for example, reservoirs of origin that become improvement targets for sustainability. While this approach is proven effective in preventing perioperative S. aureus transmission and SSIs, the relative effectiveness of the various components of the multi-faceted approach in reducing ESKAPE transmission and associated SSIs, as well as an effective national dissemination strategy, remain unknown. Therefore, the overall objectives for this study are to examine the relative effectiveness of each programmatic component in controlling ESKAPE spread and associated SSIs and to identify the best approach for national dissemination of this technology. The investigators will use a cluster-randomized design to evaluate the implementation and sustainability of each approach guided by RE-AIM framework. More broadly, these findings will be relevant to supporting hospital's implementation of a wide array of preventive interventions and has potential for vastly improving patient care and outcomes.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Infection

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

FACTORIAL

2x2 Factorial
Primary Study Purpose

PREVENTION

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Surveillance with EBIP Coaching

Surveillance will be offered to 3 teams with Evidence-Based Infection Prevention Bundle (EBIP) coaching in block randomization. Surveillance tool will execute regularly updated reports (continually updated with laboratory data entry of ESKAPE pathogen isolation results), which generates a set of data that will populate series of tables and graphs for each site based on data collection form as previously reported. EBIP involves evidence-based improvements in perioperative hand hygiene, environmental cleaning, vascular care, and patient decolonization. Each participating site will receive monthly team-based coaching to establish a multidisciplinary team charged with continuously improving transmission and infection prevention.

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Technical assistance or team-based coaching

Intervention Type BEHAVIORAL

Main comparison in delivering peri-operative preventive strategies against transmission and infection is one on one technical assistance or team-based coaching.

Technical Assistance No Surveillance

TA will be offered to 3 teams. TA will have monthly scheduled TA calls (60 minutes each) with each team individually to review and discuss the protocol interventions (as is done in the EBIP group) and allow for a consultation with experts on the peri-operative interventions. Surveillance toolkit will only be used for transmission data collection.

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Technical assistance or team-based coaching

Intervention Type BEHAVIORAL

Main comparison in delivering peri-operative preventive strategies against transmission and infection is one on one technical assistance or team-based coaching.

EBIP Coaching No Surveillance

EBIP will be offered to 3 teams. Each participating site will receive monthly team-based coaching to establish a multidisciplinary team charged with continuously improving transmission and infection prevention. EBIP involves evidence-based improvements in perioperative hand hygiene, environmental cleaning, vascular care, and patient decolonization. Surveillance toolkit will only be used for transmission data collection.

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Technical assistance or team-based coaching

Intervention Type BEHAVIORAL

Main comparison in delivering peri-operative preventive strategies against transmission and infection is one on one technical assistance or team-based coaching.

Surveillance with Technical Assistance

Surveillance will be offered to 3 teams with Technical Assistance (TA) in block randomization. Surveillance tool will execute regularly updated reports (continually updated with laboratory data entry of ESKAPE pathogen isolation results), which generates a set of data that will populate series of tables and graphs for each site based on data collection form as previously reported.

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Technical assistance or team-based coaching

Intervention Type BEHAVIORAL

Main comparison in delivering peri-operative preventive strategies against transmission and infection is one on one technical assistance or team-based coaching.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Technical assistance or team-based coaching

Main comparison in delivering peri-operative preventive strategies against transmission and infection is one on one technical assistance or team-based coaching.

Intervention Type BEHAVIORAL

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* operating room conducting orthopedic total joint and spine
* Surgeons performing orthopedic total joint or spine


\- all elective patients undergoing orthopedic total joint and spine

Exclusion Criteria

* 250 patients (125 case pairs) per site in the active phase (N=3,000)
* 250 patients (125 case pairs) per site in the sustainability phase (N=3,000)
* Total N=6,000
* orthopedic total joint and spine procedures


\- medical centers actively enrolling patients in a bacterial transmission or infection prevention trial


* no requirement for anesthesia and/or placement of a peripheral intravenous catheter
* lack of incision or informed, written consent
* an allergy to chlorhexidine
* povidone iodine or isopropyl alcohol
* ASA health classification status\>5
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Mayo Clinic

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

Georgetown University

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

Trustees of Dartmouth College

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Jeremiah R Brown, PhD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Trustees of Dartmouth College

Randy Loftus, MD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Mayo Clinic

Ib en K Sullivan, PhD

Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR

Trustees of Dartmouth College

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Mayo Clinic

Rochester, Minnesota, United States

Site Status RECRUITING

Trustees of Dartmouth College

Hanover, New Hampshire, United States

Site Status RECRUITING

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United States

Central Contacts

Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.

Jeremiah R Brown, PhD

Role: CONTACT

603-646-5409

Iben Sullivan, PhD

Role: CONTACT

Facility Contacts

Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.

Randy Loftus, MD

Role: primary

Jeremiah R Brown, PhD

Role: primary

Meagan Stabler, PhD

Role: backup

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

STUDY00032185

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.