Effect of Active Versus Passive Lower Extremity Neural Mobilization in Lumber Radiculopathy

NCT ID: NCT04581239

Last Updated: 2020-10-09

Basic Information

• Recruitment Status: COMPLETED
• Clinical Phase: NA
• Total Enrollment: 24 participants
• Study Classification: INTERVENTIONAL
• Study Start Date: 2019-03-15
• Study Completion Date: 2020-01-30

Brief Summary

The aim of this study was to find out the effects of active versus passive lower extremity neuralmobilizations combined with lumbar traction and lumbar mobilization in patients with lumbarradiculopathy. The study was conducted in shalamar hospital Lahore and was completed within 6 month of time duration. Sample size of twenty four patient consists of both male and female aged between 45 years to 65 years. Each group contain 12 patients. Group A received active neural mobilizations whereas group B received passive neural mobilization along with lumber traction and mobilization. Patients were re assessed at the end of 6 weeks through SLR , NPRS and ODI.

Detailed Description

Lower back pain is found to be one of the common health condition approximately 80% of individual experience back pain once in their lives. Radicular lower back pain is also a disorder that involves the dysfunction of the nerve roots of lumbosacral region. Its symptoms include radiating pain with numbness, paraesthesia and muscle weakness. In general population the annual prevalence of lumber radiculopathy varied from 9.9% to 25% .. Many of the spinal structures notably ligaments, paravertebral muscles, facet joints, spinal nerve roots and annulus fibrosis have been considered as the main cause of the pain. Clinical examinations mostly aim to clarify that whether a nerve root has mechanical impingement. The common clinical diagnostic tests include tests for tendon reflexes, straight leg raise test(SLR), sensory deficits and motor weakness. Several clinicians and researchers have come up with several debates for the treatment of Lower back pain. But not many studies have come up that actually authenticates that how much effective are physical therapy interventions. The common treatments for radical lower back pain includes physical modalities like TENS, ultrasound, Heat and Cryotherapy, lumbar traction and lumbar spinal mobilizations. Kinesiotherapy including ROM exercises and strengthening are also used to treat lower back pain. Neural mobilization techniques actually help in restoring the plasticity of nervous system. Plasticity of nervous system is actually the ability of the nerve surrounding structures to adapt of shift according to other structures. The aim of mobilization is actually to increase the collagen flexibility that helps in maintaining the integrity and movement of the nerve according to its surrounding structures. Radiculopathy management and lower back pain management have a direct link with neural mobilization.

However, evidence lacks whether active or passive lower extremity neural mobilization is more effective. Thus, the purpose of the current study is to compare the effects of active and passive neural mobilization in the management of lumbar radiculopathy, in combination with mechanical traction and joint mobilization.

In 2016 an RCT was conducted and concluded the efficacy of neural mobilization techniques in patients with radicular low back pain. They concluded that neural mobilizations techniques in radicular low back pain are effective. They stated that these techniques reduce the pain, functional disability and enhance the physiological functioning of the nerve root in patients in low back pain with lumbosacral radiculopathy . In 2014 A comparative study was conducted and found that lower extremity neural mobilizations along with conventional physiotherapy such as lumbar traction and lumbar mobilizations improves the agility in lower extremity and reduces pain and disability.

2013 a Study was conducted to observe observed the effects of neural mobilizations in the patients with radicular low back pain and concluded that patients treated with neural mobilizations showed better VAS score. They stated that further research is needed in order to assess the long-term effects of treatment and treatments provided on more than one occasion.

The purpose of the study was to determine the effects of active verses passive lower extremity neural mobilizations combined lumbar traction and lumbar mobilization so that in future this study should be helpful for other researchers to determine which therapy is most helpful in rehabilitation of the patients with radicular low back pain signs and symptoms.

Conditions

Lumbar Radiculopathy

Study Design

• Allocation Method: RANDOMIZED
• Intervention Model: PARALLEL
• Primary Study Purpose: TREATMENT
• Blinding Strategy: SINGLE

Study Groups

Active neural mobilization

Therapist supervised active neural mobilization of sciatic nerve in lumber radiculopathy patients

Group Type: ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Active neural mobilization

Intervention Type: OTHER

Active neural mobilization Base line treatment followed heating pad 10 minutes, lumber traction with 50 %of body weight in accordance with tolerance. 15 to 20 Lumber segmental mobilization.

Active oscillatory nerve mobilization was given in 3 sets of 10 repetition in each set with 20 sec rest time between set

passive neural mobilization

Therapist done passicive neural mobilization of sciatic nerve in lumber radiculopathy patients

Group Type: EXPERIMENTAL

passive neural mobilization

Intervention Type: OTHER

Base line treatment followed heating pad 10 minutes, lumber traction with 50 %of body weight in accordance with tolerance. 15 to 20 Lumber segmental mobilization

Passive neural mobilization This oscillatory nerve mobilization was given in 3 sets of 10 repetition in each set with 20 sec rest time between set. Both groups received total 18 session 3 session per week for consecutive 6 weeks

Interventions

Active neural mobilization

Active neural mobilization Base line treatment followed heating pad 10 minutes, lumber traction with 50 %of body weight in accordance with tolerance. 15 to 20 Lumber segmental mobilization.

Active oscillatory nerve mobilization was given in 3 sets of 10 repetition in each set with 20 sec rest time between set

Intervention Type: OTHER

passive neural mobilization

Base line treatment followed heating pad 10 minutes, lumber traction with 50 %of body weight in accordance with tolerance. 15 to 20 Lumber segmental mobilization

Passive neural mobilization This oscillatory nerve mobilization was given in 3 sets of 10 repetition in each set with 20 sec rest time between set. Both groups received total 18 session 3 session per week for consecutive 6 weeks

Intervention Type: OTHER

Eligibility Criteria

Inclusion Criteria

• Pain radiate from lower lumber area to posterior aspect of leg up to planter surface of toes.
• Patient with confirmed L4-L5, L5-S1 disc herniation or disc bulge diagnosed by neurophysician.
• Numeric pain rating scale value is more than 4.
• Patients having positive compression distraction, Lasegue's sign and lower limb neural tension tests. (LLNTT).Lasègue's sign is said to be positive if the angle to which the leg can be raised (upon straight leg raising) before eliciting pain is <45°.

Exclusion Criteria

• Any red flags (tumor, fracture, metabolic diseases, rheumatoid arthritis, osteoporosis, resting
• blood pressure greater than 140/90 mmHg, prolonged history of steroid use, etc)
• Any systemic disease as diabetes or neurological condition that altered the function of the nervous system
• Prolong use of steroids.
• History of any surgery, trauma, or pathology of back, hip, knee, and ankle.
• Spinal stenosis, Potts disease
• Taking any treatment or medication except physiotherapy

• Minimum Eligible Age: 45 Years
• Maximum Eligible Age: 65 Years
• Eligible Sex: ALL
• Accepts Healthy Volunteers: No

Sponsors

Riphah International University

OTHER

Sponsor Role: lead

Responsible Party

Responsibility Role: SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Binash Afzal, Phd*

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Riphah International University

Locations

Shalamar hospital Lahore

Lahore, , Pakistan

Countries

Pakistan

References

Masters S, Lind R. Musculoskeletal pain - presentations to general practice. Aust Fam Physician. 2010 Jun;39(6):425-8.

Reference Type: BACKGROUND

PMID: 20628683 (View on PubMed)

Satpute K, Hall T, Bisen R, Lokhande P. The Effect of Spinal Mobilization With Leg Movement in Patients With Lumbar Radiculopathy-A Double-Blind Randomized Controlled Trial. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2019 May;100(5):828-836. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2018.11.004. Epub 2018 Dec 3.

Reference Type: BACKGROUND

PMID: 30521781 (View on PubMed)

Ellis RF, Hing WA. Neural mobilization: a systematic review of randomized controlled trials with an analysis of therapeutic efficacy. J Man Manip Ther. 2008;16(1):8-22. doi: 10.1179/106698108790818594.

Reference Type: BACKGROUND

PMID: 19119380 (View on PubMed)

Hahne AJ, Ford JJ, McMeeken JM. Conservative management of lumbar disc herniation with associated radiculopathy: a systematic review. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2010 May 15;35(11):E488-504. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e3181cc3f56.

Reference Type: BACKGROUND

PMID: 20421859 (View on PubMed)

Harte AA, Baxter GD, Gracey JH. The effectiveness of motorised lumbar traction in the management of LBP with lumbo sacral nerve root involvement: a feasibility study. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2007 Nov 29;8:118. doi: 10.1186/1471-2474-8-118.

Reference Type: BACKGROUND

PMID: 18047650 (View on PubMed)

Boyles R, Toy P, Mellon J Jr, Hayes M, Hammer B. Effectiveness of manual physical therapy in the treatment of cervical radiculopathy: a systematic review. J Man Manip Ther. 2011 Aug;19(3):135-42. doi: 10.1179/2042618611Y.0000000011.

Reference Type: BACKGROUND

PMID: 22851876 (View on PubMed)

Efstathiou MA, Stefanakis M, Savva C, Giakas G. Effectiveness of neural mobilization in patients with spinal radiculopathy: a critical review. J Bodyw Mov Ther. 2015 Apr;19(2):205-12. doi: 10.1016/j.jbmt.2014.08.006. Epub 2014 Aug 17.

Reference Type: BACKGROUND

PMID: 25892373 (View on PubMed)

Kawakami M, Weinstein JN, Spratt KF, Chatani K, Traub RJ, Meller ST, Gebhart GF. Experimental lumbar radiculopathy. Immunohistochemical and quantitative demonstrations of pain induced by lumbar nerve root irritation of the rat. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 1994 Aug 15;19(16):1780-94. doi: 10.1097/00007632-199408150-00001.

Reference Type: BACKGROUND

PMID: 7526474 (View on PubMed)

Kostadinovic S, Milovanovic N, Jovanovic J, Tomasevic-Todorovic S. Efficacy of the lumbar stabilization and thoracic mobilization exercise program on pain intensity and functional disability reduction in chronic low back pain patients with lumbar radiculopathy: A randomized controlled trial. J Back Musculoskelet Rehabil. 2020;33(6):897-907. doi: 10.3233/BMR-201843.

Reference Type: BACKGROUND

PMID: 32675390 (View on PubMed)

Winkelstein BA, DeLeo JA. Nerve root injury severity differentially modulates spinal glial activation in a rat lumbar radiculopathy model: considerations for persistent pain. Brain Res. 2002 Nov 29;956(2):294-301. doi: 10.1016/s0006-8993(02)03560-6.

Reference Type: BACKGROUND

PMID: 12445698 (View on PubMed)

Kobayashi S, Kokubo Y, Uchida K, Yayama T, Takeno K, Negoro K, Nakajima H, Baba H, Yoshizawa H. Effect of lumbar nerve root compression on primary sensory neurons and their central branches: changes in the nociceptive neuropeptides substance P and somatostatin. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2005 Feb 1;30(3):276-82. doi: 10.1097/01.brs.0000152377.72468.f4.

Reference Type: BACKGROUND

PMID: 15682006 (View on PubMed)

Leininger B, Bronfort G, Evans R, Reiter T. Spinal manipulation or mobilization for radiculopathy: a systematic review. Phys Med Rehabil Clin N Am. 2011 Feb;22(1):105-25. doi: 10.1016/j.pmr.2010.11.002. Epub 2010 Dec 30.

Reference Type: BACKGROUND

PMID: 21292148 (View on PubMed)

Plaza-Manzano G, Cancela-Cilleruelo I, Fernandez-de-Las-Penas C, Cleland JA, Arias-Buria JL, Thoomes-de-Graaf M, Ortega-Santiago R. Effects of Adding a Neurodynamic Mobilization to Motor Control Training in Patients With Lumbar Radiculopathy Due to Disc Herniation: A Randomized Clinical Trial. Am J Phys Med Rehabil. 2020 Feb;99(2):124-132. doi: 10.1097/PHM.0000000000001295.

Reference Type: BACKGROUND

PMID: 31464753 (View on PubMed)

Han L, Zhao P, Guo W, Wei J, Wang F, Fan Y, Li Y, Min Y. Short-term study on risk-benefit outcomes of two spinal manipulative therapies in the treatment of acute radiculopathy caused by lumbar disc herniation: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial. Trials. 2015 Mar 27;16:122. doi: 10.1186/s13063-015-0634-0.

Reference Type: BACKGROUND

PMID: 25872929 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

REC/19/2025 Hafiz Abdul Rehman

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id