Non Pain Contingent Spine Rehabilitation Therapy in Chronic Low Back Pain
NCT ID: NCT04619134
Last Updated: 2020-12-29
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
NA
32 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2019-12-01
2020-12-20
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Sample size will be 32.Participants will be divided in two groups, 16 participants in group A will receive Non pain contingent spine rehabilitation (NCSR) therapy and 16 Group B will receive conventional physical therapy. The study duration will be six months. Purposive non probability sampling technique will be applied.
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
In female patients with chronic low back pain, Primary outcome measures were recorded by visual analogue scale (VAS) and oswestry disability index (ODI) .Patterns of improvement suggested that the Non pain Contingent Spinal Rehabilitation approach is more effective than Conventional Physical Therapy in female patients with chronic low back pain. It is feasible to adapt progressive Isoinertial lifting evaluation for determining the lifting capacity, it is a valid and reliable method. Lumbar dynamic strengthening exercises are beneficial in the treatment of chronic nonspecific LBP for reduction of pain, improvement in functional ability, increase range of motion and improve core strength. Exercise intervention programs involving either muscular strength, flexibility or aerobic fitness is beneficial for nonspecific chronic low back pain. Effects of lumbar stabilization exercise on functional disability and lumbar lordosis angle in patients with chronic low back pain in 2015 Lumbar stabilization exercise and conservative program were performed 3 times a week for 6 weeks and he reported that lumbar stabilization exercise is more effective than conservative treatment for improving functional disability and lumbar lordosis angle, and significant decrease in Oswestry disability index score. Comparative effect of core muscles strength training with supine bridging over prone bridging in patients with nonspecific low back pain and concluded that prone bridging exercise is more effective in improvement of functional activities and reducing pain than supine bridging exercise program in nonspecific low back pain. Effectiveness of core stabilization exercises and routine exercise therapy in management of pain in chronic non-specific low back pain" in which he reported that Core stabilization exercise is more effective than routine physical therapy exercise in terms of greater reduction in pain in patients with non-specific low back pain. In 2013 The purpose of the study was to determine the effect of core stabilization exercises in comparison with conventional exercises on pain, functional status in patients with non-specific LBP and they concluded Core stabilization exercises found to be more effective in reducing pain and improving functional status by decreasing disability of patients with non-specific low back pain in comparison with conventional exercises. Progressive Isoinertial Lift Evaluation (PILE) method was developed by Mayer et al.in PILE protocol describes it as lifting of weight in a box from floor to waist (lumbar test) or from floor to shoulder height (cervical test) at a rate of four lifts in a 20 second interval.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Keywords
Explore important study keywords that can help with search, categorization, and topic discovery.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
TREATMENT
DOUBLE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
NCSR Program
Non Pain Contingent Spinal Rehabilitation
NCSR Program
flexibility exercise,strengthening exercise,dynamic strengthening exercise,endurance training,counselling session
Conventional Physical therapy
Conventional Physical Therapy
conventional physical therapy
hot pack,flexibility training,strengthening exercise.
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
NCSR Program
flexibility exercise,strengthening exercise,dynamic strengthening exercise,endurance training,counselling session
conventional physical therapy
hot pack,flexibility training,strengthening exercise.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
Exclusion Criteria
* Compression Fracture
* Disc Herniation
* Cauda equina
* Pregnancy
* Cancer
* Progressive neurological disorder
* Any Psychological disorder
35 Years
65 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Riphah International University
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Maria Khalid, MSOMPT
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Riphah International University
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Pakistan Railway General Hospital
Rawalpindi, Punjab Province, Pakistan
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Gordon R, Bloxham S. A Systematic Review of the Effects of Exercise and Physical Activity on Non-Specific Chronic Low Back Pain. Healthcare (Basel). 2016 Apr 25;4(2):22. doi: 10.3390/healthcare4020022.
Qaseem A, Wilt TJ, McLean RM, Forciea MA; Clinical Guidelines Committee of the American College of Physicians; Denberg TD, Barry MJ, Boyd C, Chow RD, Fitterman N, Harris RP, Humphrey LL, Vijan S. Noninvasive Treatments for Acute, Subacute, and Chronic Low Back Pain: A Clinical Practice Guideline From the American College of Physicians. Ann Intern Med. 2017 Apr 4;166(7):514-530. doi: 10.7326/M16-2367. Epub 2017 Feb 14.
Nijs J, Apeldoorn A, Hallegraeff H, Clark J, Smeets R, Malfliet A, Girbes EL, De Kooning M, Ickmans K. Low back pain: guidelines for the clinical classification of predominant neuropathic, nociceptive, or central sensitization pain. Pain Physician. 2015 May-Jun;18(3):E333-46.
Chang WD, Lin HY, Lai PT. Core strength training for patients with chronic low back pain. J Phys Ther Sci. 2015 Mar;27(3):619-22. doi: 10.1589/jpts.27.619. Epub 2015 Mar 31.
Bhadauria EA, Gurudut P. Comparative effectiveness of lumbar stabilization, dynamic strengthening, and Pilates on chronic low back pain: randomized clinical trial. J Exerc Rehabil. 2017 Aug 29;13(4):477-485. doi: 10.12965/jer.1734972.486. eCollection 2017 Aug.
Cho I, Jeon C, Lee S, Lee D, Hwangbo G. Effects of lumbar stabilization exercise on functional disability and lumbar lordosis angle in patients with chronic low back pain. J Phys Ther Sci. 2015 Jun;27(6):1983-5. doi: 10.1589/jpts.27.1983. Epub 2015 Jun 30.
Akhtar MW, Karimi H, Gilani SA. Effectiveness of core stabilization exercises and routine exercise therapy in management of pain in chronic non-specific low back pain: A randomized controlled clinical trial. Pak J Med Sci. 2017 Jul-Aug;33(4):1002-1006. doi: 10.12669/pjms.334.12664.
Inani SB, Selkar SP. Effect of core stabilization exercises versus conventional exercises on pain and functional status in patients with non-specific low back pain: a randomized clinical trial. J Back Musculoskelet Rehabil. 2013;26(1):37-43. doi: 10.3233/BMR-2012-0348.
Ito T, Shirado O, Suzuki H, Takahashi M, Kaneda K, Strax TE. Lumbar trunk muscle endurance testing: an inexpensive alternative to a machine for evaluation. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1996 Jan;77(1):75-9. doi: 10.1016/s0003-9993(96)90224-5.
Hawker GA, Mian S, Kendzerska T, French M. Measures of adult pain: Visual Analog Scale for Pain (VAS Pain), Numeric Rating Scale for Pain (NRS Pain), McGill Pain Questionnaire (MPQ), Short-Form McGill Pain Questionnaire (SF-MPQ), Chronic Pain Grade Scale (CPGS), Short Form-36 Bodily Pain Scale (SF-36 BPS), and Measure of Intermittent and Constant Osteoarthritis Pain (ICOAP). Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken). 2011 Nov;63 Suppl 11:S240-52. doi: 10.1002/acr.20543. No abstract available.
Saur PM, Ensink FB, Frese K, Seeger D, Hildebrandt J. Lumbar range of motion: reliability and validity of the inclinometer technique in the clinical measurement of trunk flexibility. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 1996 Jun 1;21(11):1332-8. doi: 10.1097/00007632-199606010-00011.
Williamson E. Fear Avoidance Beliefs Questionnaire (FABQ). Aust J Physiother. 2006;52(2):149. doi: 10.1016/s0004-9514(06)70052-6. No abstract available.
Jensen LD, Maribo T, Schiottz-Christensen B, Madsen FH, Gonge B, Christensen M, Frost P. Counselling low-back-pain patients in secondary healthcare: a randomised trial addressing experienced workplace barriers and physical activity. Occup Environ Med. 2012 Jan;69(1):21-8. doi: 10.1136/oem.2010.064055. Epub 2011 May 19.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
REC/00673 Fariha Altaf
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id