Setting a Benchmark for Resource Utilization and Quality of Care in Patients Undergoing TAVI in Europe
NCT ID: NCT04579445
Last Updated: 2024-10-01
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
2408 participants
OBSERVATIONAL
2021-05-03
2024-08-01
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
The registry will consist of the following phases:
* Retrospective phase (purpose: capture the status quo of each site prior to any Quality of Care improvement measures): The TAVI of patients being eligible for retrospective documentation must have been performed prior to the site's enrollment into the BENCHMARK prospective phase (follow-up: 30 days, 12 months).
* Education phase: Each center will undergo an online BENCHMARK education. The contents of the education will be: Reflection on treatment pathways with the TAVI team, education on 8 defined Quality of Care improvement measures, followed by a center self-assessment (to self-assess the current alignment of hospital performance with the BENCHMARK Quality od Care measures).
* Implementation phase: After having self-assessed the current alignment of hospital performance with the following BENCHMARK Quality of care measures, each center will start to introduce the tailored Quality of Care improvement measures to their hospital routine within a time frame of 2 months.
* Prospective phase (purpose: to document the effects of defined quality of care improvement measure and to make sure patient safety is as least as good as in the retrospective phase. (8 months of recruitment, Follow-up: 30 days, 12 months)
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Registry to Evaluate the Impact of a Valve Coordinator on Aortic Stenosis / TAVI Outcome - (German Pilot)
NCT03570190
The Prospective Segeberg TAVI Registry
NCT03192774
The ReTAVI Prospective Observational Registry
NCT05601453
Validation of the "TASQ" in Patients Undergoing SAVR or TF-TAVI
NCT03186339
Portico TAVI Implant With Transfemoral Delivery System
NCT01493284
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
In an effort not to lose grounds because of an increasing inner-hospital competition for resources including intensive care unit (ICU) and general hospital beds, there is a need for a streamlined Quality of Care (QoC) pathway that delivers the procedure more efficient, but with at least the same patient safety. In this context, the recent FAST-TAVI (Feasibility And Safety of early discharge after Transfemoral TAVI) and North American Multidisciplinary, Multimodality, But Minimalist (3M) studies have shown that optimized risk assessment and patient management results in a more effective, as least as safe treatment pathway and a reduced length of stay (LoS).
The results gain importance especially in a situation where patients suffering from the coronavirus disease compete for hospital resources throughout Europe. Using a clear set of Quality of Care criteria, the BENCHMARK registry aims to document the progress that can be made if tailored Quality of Care improvement measures are initiated.
The hypothesis is that the implementation of standardized, reproducible and scalable Quality of Care improvement measures will help reducing resource requirements, intensive care unit bed occupancy and overall length of hospitalization with uncompromised patient safety.
There will be up to 30 centers participating across Europe (Germany, Austria, Italy, France, Spain, Czech Republic, Romania). Each center will enroll 80 patients (retrospective documentation of 30 patients, prospective enrollment of 50 patients), resulting in 2400 patients in total.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
CASE_ONLY
PROSPECTIVE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
TAVI patients
Consecutive, severe aortic stenosis patients undergoing transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) (there will be a retrospective part: documentation of 30 patients who underwent transfemoral TAVI; and a prospective part enrolling 50 patients undergoing transfemoral TAVI)
Education on tailored Quality Improvement measures
Centers will undergo an education on defined Quality of Care measures, with the aim to implement a standardized pathway which is reproducible, scalable and which will allow increased access. The implementation of these measures will help to reduce resource requirements, intensive care bed occupancy and overall length of hospital stay with uncompromised patient safety.
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Education on tailored Quality Improvement measures
Centers will undergo an education on defined Quality of Care measures, with the aim to implement a standardized pathway which is reproducible, scalable and which will allow increased access. The implementation of these measures will help to reduce resource requirements, intensive care bed occupancy and overall length of hospital stay with uncompromised patient safety.
Other Intervention Names
Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Consecutive, severe symptomatic aortic stenosis patients who underwent transcatheter aortic valve implantation with a balloon-expandable transcatheter aortic valve prior to the center education on BENCHMARK QoC (Quality of Care) improvement measure (prior to the first education call)).
* Patient is or was scheduled to undergo a 30 Day and 12 Months follow-up (30 Day and 12 Months follow-up: hospital visit or phone call)
* All patients irrespective of valve type or access route will be documented in an electronic Case Report Form (eCRF) based patient logbook.
Prospective phase:
* Consecutive patients with a diagnosis of severe symptomatic aortic stenosis admitted for TAVI with a balloon-expandable transcatheter heart valve after center education on BENCHMARK Quality of Care measures and after the center has passed the implementation phase.
* All patients irrespective of valve type or access route will be documented in an eCRF based patient logbook.
Exclusion Criteria
* Patients with largely incomplete data with respect to the aims of the project.
* Patients without signed informed consent / data protection statement (according to requirements of local ethical committee).
* Pregnant women at the time of the TAVI.
Prospective phase:
* Patients without signed informed consent prior to the TAVI procedure (data protection statement included; ideally covered by hospital routine to enable consecutiveness).
* Pregnant women at the time of the TAVI.
18 Years
115 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Edwards Lifesciences
INDUSTRY
Institut für Pharmakologie und Präventive Medizin
NETWORK
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Derk Frank, Prof.
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
UKSH Kiel
Gemma McCalmont
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
James Cook Hospital, Middlesbrough, United Kingdom
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
St. Pölten University Hospital
Sankt Pölten, , Austria
KH Nord, Klinik Floridsdorf
Vienna, , Austria
IKEM Prague
Prague, , Czechia
Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Besancon
Besançon, , France
Polyclinique Du Bois
Lille, , France
Infirmerie Protestante de Lyon
Lyon, , France
Hopital Saint Joseph
Marseille, , France
Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Montpellier
Montpellier, , France
IMM (Institut Mutualiste Montsouris) Paris
Paris, , France
Pitie Salpetriere Hospital Paris
Paris, , France
CHU Rennes
Rennes, , France
CHRU Tours
Tours, , France
Herzzentrum Köln
Cologne, , Germany
University Medical Center Göttingen
Göttingen, , Germany
University Hospital Heidelberg
Heidelberg, , Germany
Saarland University Medical Center
Homburg, , Germany
CKMS Munich, Artemed Clinics
Munich, , Germany
Brüderkrankenhaus Trier
Trier, , Germany
L'Ospedale S.Giuseppe Moscati di Avellino
Avellino, , Italy
Careggi Hospital
Florence, , Italy
Centro Cardiologico, Monzino Hospital
Milan, , Italy
Azienda Ospedaliera Ordine Mauriziano di Torino
Torino, , Italy
Institutul de Urgenta pentru Boli Cardiolvasculaire
Bucharest, , Romania
Hospital de la Santa Creu i Sant Pau
Barcelona, , Spain
Hospital Bellvitge
Barcelona, , Spain
Hospital Clinico San Carlos
Madrid, , Spain
Hospital Regional Universitario de Málaga
Málaga, , Spain
Hospital Universitari Son Espases
Palma de Mallorca, , Spain
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
McCalmont G, Durand E, Lauck S, Muir DF, Spence MS, Vasa-Nicotera M, Wood D, Saia F, Chatel N, Luske CM, Kurucova J, Bramlage P, Frank D. Setting a benchmark for resource utilization and quality of care in patients undergoing transcatheter aortic valve implantation in Europe-Rationale and design of the international BENCHMARK registry. Clin Cardiol. 2021 Oct;44(10):1344-1353. doi: 10.1002/clc.23711. Epub 2021 Sep 9.
Frank D, Durand E, Lauck S, Muir DF, Spence M, Vasa-Nicotera M, Wood D, Saia F, Urbano-Carrillo CA, Bouchayer D, Iliescu VA, Saint Etienne C, Leclercq F, Auffret V, Asmarats L, Di Mario C, Veugeois A, Maly J, Schober A, Nombela-Franco L, Werner N, Gomez-Hospital JA, Mascherbauer J, Musumeci G, Meneveau N, Meurice T, Mahfoud F, De Marco F, Seidler T, Leuschner F, Joly P, Collet JP, Vogt F, Di Lorenzo E, Kuhn E, Disdier VP, Hachaturyan V, Luske CM, Rakova R, Wesselink W, Kurucova J, Bramlage P, McCalmont G; BENCHMARK Investigator Group. A streamlined pathway for transcatheter aortic valve implantation: the BENCHMARK study. Eur Heart J. 2024 Jun 1;45(21):1904-1916. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehae147.
Saia F, Lauck S, Durand E, Muir DF, Spence M, Vasa-Nicotera M, Wood D, Urbano-Carrillo CA, Bouchayer D, Iliescu VA, Etienne CS, Leclercq F, Auffret V, Asmarats L, Di Mario C, Veugeois A, Maly J, Schober A, Nombela-Franco L, Werner N, Gomez-Hospital JA, Mascherbauer J, Musumeci G, Meneveau N, Meurice T, Mahfoud F, De Marco F, Seidler T, Leuschner F, Joly P, Collet JP, Vogt F, Di Lorenzo E, Kuhn E, Disdier VP, McCalmont G, Rakova R, Wesselink W, Kurucova J, Hachaturyan V, Luske CM, Bramlage P, Frank D; BENCHMARK Investigator Group. The implementation of a streamlined TAVI patient pathway across five European countries: BENCHMARK registry. Clin Res Cardiol. 2025 Apr 22. doi: 10.1007/s00392-025-02638-z. Online ahead of print.
Related Links
Access external resources that provide additional context or updates about the study.
Registry webpage
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
BENCHMARK Registry
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.