Virtual Patient Education From Real Cases

NCT ID: NCT04553640

Last Updated: 2023-07-12

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

28 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2021-05-15

Study Completion Date

2023-06-30

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Misdiagnosis of neurological conditions is common in healthcare settings, sometimes with devastating consequences. Most diagnostic errors result from failures in bedside diagnostic reasoning. Dizziness is a symptom that is common, costly, and frequently associated with missed stroke. Too often healthcare providers have misconceptions about diagnostic approaches to dizziness. Current systems of medical education, residency training, and licensure requirements have proven insufficient to prevent harms from diagnostic error. Traditional lectures do not change physician behavior but active learning strategies with the use of simulation do. The investigators built and hope to expand a simulation-based curriculum to improve diagnosis of dizziness (SIDD) that will mirror real-world encounters and clinical practice. Using the tenets of deliberate practice with rapid, real-time feedback, the investigators hope to improve the approach to dizziness of healthcare providers and correct knowledge deficits that contribute to diagnostic errors. Investigators have chosen dizziness as the "model symptom" for this study. Future plans include expanding this approach to other symptoms that are also common, costly, and associated with a high misdiagnosis rate (e.g. abdominal pain, dyspnea, or chest pain).

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Diagnostic errors and resulting misdiagnosis-related harms represent a major public health problem. Most diagnostic errors result from failures in bedside diagnostic reasoning. Gaps in expertise (ultimately linked to faulty knowledge, inadequate training, or lack of feedback) account for many of these failures. Current systems of medical education, residency training, and licensure requirements have proven insufficient to prevent harms from diagnostic errors. The National Academy of Medicine recommends using simulation training with early exposure to a variety of typical/atypical cases to improve diagnostic performance. A systematic review found strong positive associations between simulation training and improved outcomes of knowledge, skills, and behaviors. Training in bedside diagnosis could be dramatically enhanced through symptom-specific virtual patient (VP) curricula that expose learners to real-world cases in a deliberate practice framework - practice that is motivated, purposeful, and systematic. This approach allows the appropriate mix of cases and difficulty to be presented to learners sequentially, potentially enhancing clinical skills.

Clinical presentations with nonspecific symptoms and diagnoses with wide differentials are especially prone to diagnostic errors; dizziness may be the epitome of this conundrum. Dizziness is a symptom that is common, costly, and associated with missed stroke. Isolated dizziness is the most common clinical context for missed stroke. Stroke is a leading cause of major long-term disability in the United States and an enormous source of global disease burden. It is listed as the fourth most common diagnostic errors among those reported by physicians. In fact, closed-claims analyses focused on neurologic conditions found stroke as the most common misdiagnosis, and more than 20% occurred in the ED. A hospital records analyses indicated that deaths due to cerebrovascular events result from diagnostic error far more frequently than those due to myocardial infarction. The ED is a high-risk site for diagnostic errors and indiscriminate use of neuroimaging for diagnosis of dizziness is neither accurate nor cost-effective. Risk stratification using symptoms and signs at the bedside offer the potential to provide cost-effective reductions in misdiagnosis-related harms. There is evidence to suggest that providers are currently ill-equipped and harbor misconceptions about the best approach to dizzy patients. Therefore, the investigators chose dizziness as the "model symptom" for study.

Even at Johns Hopkins Medicine, where dizziness diagnosis has been studied extensively, this remains a problem. The Center for Diagnostic Excellence group recently showed that (a) \<5% of dizziness charts have correct documentation of standard bedside examination techniques; (b) 40% of patients leave the ED with a symptom-only diagnosis (at least half of whom could have been correctly diagnosed and treated); and (c) 39% receive a CT (\>90% of which are inappropriate). Emergency medicine residents overwhelmingly express the need for better training in dizziness diagnosis.

The investigators recently demonstrated that \<10 hours' worth of simulation-based deliberate practice training using a dizziness-focused ViPER (Virtual Patient Education from Real Cases) curriculum made internal medicine interns twice as accurate as senior resident colleagues on VP cases. The investigators now seek to do the same for emergency medicine residents and demonstrate real-world impact.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Simulation Dizziness Vertigo Stroke

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

CROSSOVER

Phase 1: A stratified randomized controlled delayed intervention trial to assess the effectiveness of the "intervention" relative to a "control" condition. Participants will undergo a pretest \& then stratified randomization to groups A or B (depending on clinical experience). Participants in group A will be exposed to the intervention (virtual patient curriculum + Feedback) and participants in group B will be exposed to the control (Online articles on dizziness and traditional ED residency training). The groups will then reverse so that now group B is exposed to the intervention. Outcomes will be measured for all participants at T0 (pretest), T1 (crossover point), and T2 (intervention end).

Phase 2: This will be a non-randomized study between intervention group (those ED providers who participated in our curriculum) vs. new control group (matched ED providers who did not participate in our curriculum).
Primary Study Purpose

OTHER

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Group A/Intervention Curriculum

Virtual patient (VP) cases and feedback available through solving VP cases and participants' self-report on the diagnosis of dizzy patients in the emergency department.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Group A/Intervention Curriculum

Intervention Type OTHER

Virtual patient cases and feedback

Group B/Control Curriculum

Intervention Type OTHER

Online articles on dizziness and emergency department clinical experience

Group B/Control curriculum

Online articles on dizziness AND regular emergency department clinical rotations

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Group A/Intervention Curriculum

Intervention Type OTHER

Virtual patient cases and feedback

Group B/Control Curriculum

Intervention Type OTHER

Online articles on dizziness and emergency department clinical experience

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Group A/Intervention Curriculum

Virtual patient cases and feedback

Intervention Type OTHER

Group B/Control Curriculum

Online articles on dizziness and emergency department clinical experience

Intervention Type OTHER

Other Intervention Names

Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.

Simulation-based curriculum to Improve Diagnosis of Dizziness (SIDD)

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* All internal medicine interns (PGY 1) and residents (PGY 2 and 3) at Johns Hopkins Hospital (JHH) and Johns Hopkins Bayview Medical Center (JHBMC) will be invited to participate voluntarily.
* JHBMC and JHH Hospitalists, Physician Assistants, Nurse Practitioners, Emergency Medicine Residents.

Exclusion Criteria

* Interns and residents not associated with the internal medicine or emergency medicine residency programs at JHH and JHBMC.
* Hospitalists, Physician Assistants, Nurse Practitioners not associated with JHBMC or JHH.
Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Johns Hopkins University

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Susrutha Kotwal, MD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Johns Hopkins University

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine

Baltimore, Maryland, United States

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United States

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

IRB00167998

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

Vestibulopathy as a Cause of Imbalance in Parkinson
NCT04768647 COMPLETED PHASE1/PHASE2