Clinical and Dimensional Outcomes of Sealing Socket Abutment Combined to Alveolar Ridge Preservation

NCT ID: NCT04553146

Last Updated: 2023-04-26

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

UNKNOWN

Clinical Phase

PHASE4

Total Enrollment

20 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2018-08-22

Study Completion Date

2025-08-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

objectives

The aim of this study was to assess the implant outcomes as well as hard and soft tissue dimensional changes of immediate implant placement in posterior sites using a custom-made sealing socket abutment (SSA) combined to alveolar ridge preservation (ARP).

Material and methods

Twenty posterior teeth were immediately replaced with implants in 20 patients. The remaining sockets were filled with Deproteinized Bovine Bone Mineral. Based on intra-oral scanners (IOS), custom-made SSAs were placed the same day. CBCT and IOS were performed to monitor hard and soft tissue dimensional changes. Moreover, implant survival rate, peri-implant bone changes, peri-implant health and pink esthetic score were recorded at 1 year, 3years and 5 years.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Study population

Hopeless maxillary or mandibular molars with tooth anatomy and bone anchorage allowing an immediate implant procedure: apical bone height of at least 5 mm or presence of interradicular septum, socket with intact bone walls, absence a large apical periodontitis, Patients needing tooth replacement in the posterior region (molars) will be recruited from the Department of Periodontology and Oral and Implant Surgery of the University of Liège, Belgium.

Procedures

After a local anesthesia, one of the two experienced surgeons (LF or LG) proceeded to the least traumatic extraction of the concerned tooth. The consecutive drills for implant placement were carried out while considering the future position of the crown for a screw- retained restoration. Twenty BLX implants (Roxolid®, SLAactive®, Institut Straumann AG) were placed flapless with a sufficient apical or septum anchorage and the insertion torque was recorded. The gap around the implant was filled with deproteinized bovine bone mineral (DBBM) (cerabone®, botiss biomaterials GmbH).

Just after the implant placement, an intra-oral scan (IOS) (Trios 3®, 3-Shape) with a scanbody connected onto the implant platform was performed and sent to the dental laboratory to digitally design (Dental Wings®) a customized healing abutment. The SSA was then milled (CARES®, Institut Straumann AG) from a block of PEEK (JUVORATMPEEK, JUVORATM Ltd. National Distributor: Institut Straumann AG), cemented to a titanium abutment (Variobase®, Institut Straumann AG) and provided to the patient on the same day. During manufacturing of the SSA, a conventional healing abutment was screwed on the implant and a collagen sponge (Collaplug®) was provisionally placed buccally to protect the exposed biomaterial until the placement of the SSA. A standardized parallel peri-apical radiograph using a custom-made film holder was taken in order to record the baseline bone level. Each patient was instructed to rinse twice daily with an aqueous solution of 0.2% chlorhexidine (Corsodyl®, GSK) and to avoid brushing of the area until the first recall 10-12 days later. Anti-inflammatories (Ibuprofen® 600 mg) and additional analgesics (Paracetamol® 500 mg) were prescribed and taken according to the patient's needs. If the surgeon deemed it necessary, an anti- biotic was prescribed (Amoxicillin® 500mg 3x/day during 5 days). Three months after implantation, the abutment was removed, the osseointegration of the implant was checked and the final lithium aluminosilicate ceramic reinforced with lithium disilicate monolithic crown (n!ce® glass-ceramic block, Institut Straumann AG) based on the initial IOS was cemented to a titanium abutment (Variobase®, Institut Straumann AG) and placed. The transmucosal design from the SSA was replicated on the final crown. Follow-up evaluations and data recording will be performed 7-10 days, 3 months, 6 months, 12 months, 3years and 5years after the surgery.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Non-maintainable Posterior Tooth (Molars and Premolars)

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

NA

Intervention Model

SINGLE_GROUP

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Interventional arm

immediate implant placement in posterior sites using a custom-made sealing socket abutment combined to alveolar ridge preservation

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Immediate implantation in posterior region with alveolar ridge preservation combined with sealing socket abutment

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Twenty BLXⓇ Straumann immediate implants were placed flapless. The gap around the implant was filled with xenogeneic biomaterial. An intra-oral scanner was performed and sent to the dental laboratory to digitally design a customized healing abutment. The abutment was then milled from a block of PEEK and placed a couple of hours later in the clinic. Three months after implantation, the abutment was removed and the final monolithic crown based on the initial IOS was placed. The transmucosal design from the SSA was replicated on the final crown.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Immediate implantation in posterior region with alveolar ridge preservation combined with sealing socket abutment

Twenty BLXⓇ Straumann immediate implants were placed flapless. The gap around the implant was filled with xenogeneic biomaterial. An intra-oral scanner was performed and sent to the dental laboratory to digitally design a customized healing abutment. The abutment was then milled from a block of PEEK and placed a couple of hours later in the clinic. Three months after implantation, the abutment was removed and the final monolithic crown based on the initial IOS was placed. The transmucosal design from the SSA was replicated on the final crown.

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* good general health (ASA I/II),
* more than 18 years old,
* non smoker,
* one hopeless tooth,
* healthy periodontal condition,
* the presence of at least 2 mm of keratinized gingiva,
* adequate plaque control (FMPS ≤ 25%), adequate bone quantity in the septum if present and at least 5 mm of bone in the apical region

Exclusion Criteria

* auto-immune disease or immunocompromised patients,
* uncontrolled diabetes,
* use of steroids or biphosphonates,
* local or systemic infection (medical treatment needed prior to entrance to the study), pregnancy or breastfeeding, alcoholism or chronically drug abuse.


* bone availability requiring an angulated abutment,
* untreated local inflammation,
* cyst,
* mucosal disease or oral lesions,
* local irradiation therapy,
* oral communication with sinus after the extraction.
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Institut Straumann AG

INDUSTRY

Sponsor Role collaborator

University of Liege

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Dr. France LAMBERT

Head and Chair of Department

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

CHU University of Liège

Liège, , Belgium

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Belgium

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

H2017-BLX

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

Mucograft Seal in ARP Follow-up
NCT05663385 RECRUITING