Timing of Soft Tissue Grafting Following Immediate Implant Placement
NCT ID: NCT05537545
Last Updated: 2023-10-03
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
RECRUITING
NA
40 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2022-08-01
2028-07-01
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
In all of the patients, a connective tissue graft (CTG) will be harvested and inserted into the buccal mucosa to increase soft tissue thickness around the immediately installed implant. However, included patients will be randomly allocated to either receive the CTG immediately after implant installation (Immediate soft tissue grafting, ISG = control group) or 3 months after implant installation (Delayed soft tissue grafting, DSG = test group).
Forty sealed envelopes are prepared for that purpose, of which 20 are internally labeled as "DSG" and 20 as "ISG". Following IIP, a sealed envelope will be opened to reveal the treatment concept In both groups, a cutting implant is installed in an optimal 3D position. Socket grafting is performed with deproteinized bovine bone mineral to limit buccal bone resorption and to optimize soft tissue stability.
In the ISG group, a pouch is made in the buccal mucosa using microsurgical instruments. Thereupon, a free gingival graft is harvested from the palatal mucosa in the premolar area and de-epithelialized to arrive at a CTG of about 1 mm thickness. Height and length are tailored to the dimensions of the site. Then, the CTG is brought into the pouch and fixed with two single sutures onto the buccal mucosa. Finally, a healing abutment is installed, which is replaced by a provisional implant crown 2 days later.
In the DSG group, implant placement, socket grafting and installation of a provisional implant crown occur as described above. In contrast, a buccal pouch is performed 3 months after implant installation. Graft harvesting, adaptation and fixation are performed as described above.
A small-field low-dose CBCT is taken at the 1-year and 5-year follow-up in order to measure buccal bone resorption as compared to the baseline dimensions in designated software.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Comparison of Three Transmucosal Augmentation Techniques in Immediate Implant Placement
NCT06820489
State of the Art Immediate Implant Placement in the Premaxilla
NCT07080710
Immediate Implant Placement With Connective Tissue Graft or Socket Shield
NCT03594019
Immediate Versus Late Placement
NCT04741607
Connective Tissue Graft Versus Collagen Matrix
NCT04210596
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Thereafter, the gap between the implant surface and buccal bone wall is filled with deproteinized bovine bone mineral (Bio-Oss, Gheistlich Pharma).
At this point, a closed envelope is opened and the patient gets assigned to either ISG or DSG group.
In the immediate soft tissue grafting group, a de-epithelialized free gingival graft was inserted in a buccal pouch to augment the buccal soft tissues. The graft was fixed with single sutures (Seralon 6/0, Serag Wiessner, Naila, Germany).
In the delayed soft tissue grafting group, the same procedure was performed 3 months after implant placement.
In both groups, patients received an immediate, screw-retained temporary crown. Restorations were installed within the first 48h after implant placement.
Sutures were removed 1 week after soft tissue grafting.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
TREATMENT
DOUBLE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Immediate soft tissue grafting
A connective tissue graft is immediately harvested and inserted in the buccal mucosa at the moment of implant placement
Soft tissue grafting
A pouch is made in the buccal mucosa using microsurgical instruments. Thereupon, a free gingival graft is harvested from the palatal mucosa in the premolar area and de-epithelialized to arrive at a CTG of about 1 mm thickness. Height and length are tailored to the dimensions of the site. Then, the CTG is brought into the pouch and fixed with two single sutures (Seralon 6/0, Serag Wiessner, Naila, Germany) onto the buccal mucosa.
Delayed soft tissue grafting
Three months after implant placement, a connective tissue graft is harvested and inserted in the buccal mucosa
Soft tissue grafting
A pouch is made in the buccal mucosa using microsurgical instruments. Thereupon, a free gingival graft is harvested from the palatal mucosa in the premolar area and de-epithelialized to arrive at a CTG of about 1 mm thickness. Height and length are tailored to the dimensions of the site. Then, the CTG is brought into the pouch and fixed with two single sutures (Seralon 6/0, Serag Wiessner, Naila, Germany) onto the buccal mucosa.
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Soft tissue grafting
A pouch is made in the buccal mucosa using microsurgical instruments. Thereupon, a free gingival graft is harvested from the palatal mucosa in the premolar area and de-epithelialized to arrive at a CTG of about 1 mm thickness. Height and length are tailored to the dimensions of the site. Then, the CTG is brought into the pouch and fixed with two single sutures (Seralon 6/0, Serag Wiessner, Naila, Germany) onto the buccal mucosa.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Good oral hygiene defined as full-mouth plaque score ≤ 25% (O'Leary et al. 1972)
* Presence of an incisor, cuspid or premolar in the maxilla that needs to be extracted for any reason with at least one neighboring tooth present
* At least 3 mm bone available at the apical or palatal aspect of the alveolus as assessed on CBCT to ensure primary implant stability
* Intact buccal bone wall at the time of extraction
* Written informed consent
Exclusion Criteria
* Systemic diseases
* Smoking
* Suppuration
* \> 1 mm gingival asymmetry between the failing and contralateral tooth
* Untreated periodontal disease; untreated caries lesions
20 Years
ALL
Yes
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
University Ghent
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Ghent University
Ghent, Oost-Vlaanderen, Belgium
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Central Contacts
Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.
Facility Contacts
Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
O'Leary TJ, Drake RB, Naylor JE. The plaque control record. J Periodontol. 1972 Jan;43(1):38. doi: 10.1902/jop.1972.43.1.38. No abstract available.
Furhauser R, Florescu D, Benesch T, Haas R, Mailath G, Watzek G. Evaluation of soft tissue around single-tooth implant crowns: the pink esthetic score. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2005 Dec;16(6):639-44. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0501.2005.01193.x.
Zuiderveld EG, van Nimwegen WG, Meijer HJA, Jung RE, Muhlemann S, Vissink A, Raghoebar GM. Effect of connective tissue grafting on buccal bone changes based on cone beam computed tomography scans in the esthetic zone of single immediate implants: A 1-year randomized controlled trial. J Periodontol. 2021 Apr;92(4):553-561. doi: 10.1002/JPER.20-0217. Epub 2020 Sep 11.
Seyssens L, Eghbali A, Christiaens V, De Bruyckere T, Doornewaard R, Cosyn J. A one-year prospective study on alveolar ridge preservation using collagen-enriched deproteinized bovine bone mineral and saddle connective tissue graft: A cone beam computed tomography analysis. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2019 Oct;21(5):853-861. doi: 10.1111/cid.12843. Epub 2019 Aug 28.
Wessels R, De Roose S, De Bruyckere T, Eghbali A, Jacquet W, De Rouck T, Cosyn J. The Mucosal Scarring Index: reliability of a new composite index for assessing scarring following oral surgery. Clin Oral Investig. 2019 Mar;23(3):1209-1215. doi: 10.1007/s00784-018-2535-6. Epub 2018 Jul 3.
Struys T, Christiaens V, De Bruyckere T, Pitman J, Van Hove PJ, Cosyn J. A Randomized Controlled Trial on the Timing of Soft Tissue Augmentation in Immediate Implant Placement: Soft Tissue Changes and Esthetic Outcome. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2025 Feb;27(1):e70013. doi: 10.1111/cid.70013.
Cosyn J, Struys T, Van Hove PJ, De Buyser S, De Bruyckere T. A Randomized Controlled Trial on the Timing of Soft-Tissue Augmentation in Immediate Implant Placement: Hard-Tissue Changes and Clinical Outcome. J Clin Periodontol. 2024 Nov;51(11):1534-1544. doi: 10.1111/jcpe.14060. Epub 2024 Sep 1.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
ONZ-2022-0258
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.