Delirium Screening 3 Methods Study

NCT ID: NCT04551508

Last Updated: 2022-04-01

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Total Enrollment

1126 participants

Study Classification

OBSERVATIONAL

Study Start Date

2020-09-09

Study Completion Date

2021-11-01

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Observational study comparing three different methods of delirium detection in critically ill patients.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

The DELIS-3 study aims to compare three different approaches to detection of ICU (intensive care unit) delirium in critically ill patients. The CAM-ICU (Confusion Assessment Method for the ICU) and the ICDSC (Intensive Care Delirium Screening Checklist) have both been developed in the early 1990. The CAM-ICU is either positive or negative, whereas the ICDSC is a score between 0-8. A score above 3 is delirium positive. Neither scale has been validated as severity scales. The novel CAM-ICU-7 is developed from the original CAM-ICU and has been validated as a severity scale.

Detection of delirium in critically ill patients is highly necessary as delirium can be very painful to the patient. Moreover, certain subtypes of delirium is associated with increased mortality and poorer cognitive outcome when patients are followed up on long term.

Therefore, delirium screening of all patients is standard care in most intensive care units.

However, there is also a need to assess severity of delirium. The recently published CAM-ICU-7 has now been translated to Danish and this study will explore its performance compared to the CAM-ICU and the ICDSC.

In 17 Danish ICU's 10 nurses will be trained in using all three instruments. Each nurse will subsequently screen 10 patients each with all three instruments as part of their normal practice. The sequence of the instruments will be randomized to avoid that one instrument is favored by always being used first, second or last.

For each patient the following data will be collected: sex, age, reason for hospitalization (medical, neurological, surgical/ acute, planned), ventilator treatment, ability to verbalize, RASS score (sedation and agitation score) severity of disease (SMS score) and time of admission.

After all screenings has been collected, nurses will fill in a questionnaire on their perceptions of each scales' ability to reliably detect delirium, userfriendliness and how time consuming each scale were to use.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Delirium Critical Illness

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Observational Model Type

COHORT

Study Time Perspective

PROSPECTIVE

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* All patients admitted to critical care units.

Exclusion Criteria

* Patients with RASS score of -3, -4, -5
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Hospitalsenheden Vest

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Anne Højager Nielsen

Principal Investigator, MCN, PH.D.

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Helle Svenningsen, ph.d.

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

VIA University College, Aarhus, Denmark

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Regionshospitalet Herning

Herning, Central Jutland, Denmark

Site Status

Regionshospitalet Holstebro

Holstebro, Central Jutland, Denmark

Site Status

Odense Universitetshospital

Odense, C, Denmark

Site Status

Aalborg Universitetshospital

Aalborg, , Denmark

Site Status

Aarhus Universitetshospital

Aarhus, , Denmark

Site Status

Rigshospitalet

Copenhagen Ø, , Denmark

Site Status

Sydvestjysk sygehus

Esbjerg, , Denmark

Site Status

Nordsjællands Hospital

Hillerød, , Denmark

Site Status

Holbæk Sygehus

Holbæk, , Denmark

Site Status

Regionshospitalet Horsens

Horsens, , Denmark

Site Status

Sjællands Universitetshospital

Køge, , Denmark

Site Status

Regionshospitalet Randers

Randers, , Denmark

Site Status

Vejle Sygehus

Vejle, , Denmark

Site Status

Regionshospitalet Viborg

Viborg, , Denmark

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Denmark

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Khan BA, Perkins AJ, Gao S, Hui SL, Campbell NL, Farber MO, Chlan LL, Boustani MA. The Confusion Assessment Method for the ICU-7 Delirium Severity Scale: A Novel Delirium Severity Instrument for Use in the ICU. Crit Care Med. 2017 May;45(5):851-857. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0000000000002368.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 28263192 (View on PubMed)

Bergeron N, Dubois MJ, Dumont M, Dial S, Skrobik Y. Intensive Care Delirium Screening Checklist: evaluation of a new screening tool. Intensive Care Med. 2001 May;27(5):859-64. doi: 10.1007/s001340100909.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 11430542 (View on PubMed)

Ely EW, Margolin R, Francis J, May L, Truman B, Dittus R, Speroff T, Gautam S, Bernard GR, Inouye SK. Evaluation of delirium in critically ill patients: validation of the Confusion Assessment Method for the Intensive Care Unit (CAM-ICU). Crit Care Med. 2001 Jul;29(7):1370-9. doi: 10.1097/00003246-200107000-00012.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 11445689 (View on PubMed)

Almgren M, Lundmark M, Samuelson K. The Richmond Agitation-Sedation Scale: translation and reliability testing in a Swedish intensive care unit. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 2010 Jul;54(6):729-35. doi: 10.1111/j.1399-6576.2009.02173.x. Epub 2009 Dec 5.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 20002362 (View on PubMed)

Granholm A, Perner A, Krag M, Marker S, Hjortrup PB, Haase N, Holst LB, Collet MO, Jensen AKG, Moller MH. External validation of the Simplified Mortality Score for the Intensive Care Unit (SMS-ICU). Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 2019 Oct;63(9):1216-1224. doi: 10.1111/aas.13422. Epub 2019 Jul 4.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 31273763 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

31-1521-440 (STPS)

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

PupillOmetry for Prediction of DelirIUM
NCT05248035 ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING