Erector Spinae Plane Block Versus Paravertebral Block for Analgesia After Cardiac Surgery (PEPS)

NCT ID: NCT04546113

Last Updated: 2025-03-18

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

96 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2021-01-07

Study Completion Date

2023-11-02

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The purpose of this randomized double-blind study is to compare the analgesic efficacy of the bilateral Erector Spinae Plane (ESP) block versus the bilateral Thoracic Paravertebral block (TPVB), by ultrasound-guided single injection in patients who underwent sternotomy for cardiac surgery.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Cardiac surgery causes moderate to severe postoperative pain during the first 24 - 48 post-operative hours. This pain is greatly increased by mobilization (respiratory physiotherapy) and leads to the consumption of morphine.

Appropriate analgesia, along with a reduction in morphine consumption are important factors in reducing morbidity after cardiac surgery and allow better postoperative rehabilitation.

Recently, the concept of multimodal analgesia has become established, which corresponds to ensuring optimal analgesia through the use of non-morphine drugs associated with locoregional analgesia.

During cardiac surgery, Paravertebral block (TPVB) technique is the first line of reference in our establishment. Lately, a new approach of blocking the intercostal nerves called Erector Spinae Plane block (ESP) has been discovered. It is a technique that seems simpler and safer than TPVB.

Until now, the analgesic efficacy of the ESP block compared to TPVB after cardiac surgery by sternotomy has never been studied.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Pain Syndrome Analgesia Anesthesia, Local

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

PREVENTION

Blinding Strategy

DOUBLE

Participants Outcome Assessors

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Paravertebral Block

If the patient is randomized to group Paravertebral Block, the anesthesiologist performs TPVB after induction of general anesthesia. The patient is positioned in lateral decubitus position. The anesthetist performs the bilateral paravertebral block with ultrasound identification of the paravertebral space at the T4-T5 level. Slow injection of 0.3 to 0.35 ml / kg of ropivacaine on each side (diluted to 3.75 mg / ml = dilution in a 20 ml syringe with 10 ml of ropivacaine 7.5 mg / ml and 10 ml of NaCl 0.9%) after aspiration test.

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Ultrasound-guided Bilateral Paravertebral Block performed with a 20 ml injection of Ropivacaine 3,75 mg/ml/side

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Bilateral injection of 20 ml of Ropivacaine 3,75 mg/ml/side

Erector Spinae Plane Block

If the patient is randomized to group "Erector Spinae Plane Block", the anesthesiologist performs the ESPb block after induction of general anesthesia. The patient is positioned in a right lateral decubitus position. The anesthesiologist performs the erector block of the spine ESP with ultrasound identification at the T4-T5 level (identify the 1st rib on ultrasound then the space T4 to T5). Slow injection of 20 ml of ropivacaine on each side (diluted to 3.75 mg / ml = dilution in a 20 ml syringe with 10 ml of ropivacaine 7.5 mg / ml and 10 ml of 0.9% NaCl) after aspiration test.

The patient is then turned in left lateral decubitus position and the contralateral block is performed according to the same procedure.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Ultrasound-guided Bilateral Erector Spinae plane Block performed with a 20 ml injection ropivacaine 3,75 mg/ml/side

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Bilateral injection of 20 ml of Ropivacaine 3,75 mg/ml/side

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Ultrasound-guided Bilateral Paravertebral Block performed with a 20 ml injection of Ropivacaine 3,75 mg/ml/side

Bilateral injection of 20 ml of Ropivacaine 3,75 mg/ml/side

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Ultrasound-guided Bilateral Erector Spinae plane Block performed with a 20 ml injection ropivacaine 3,75 mg/ml/side

Bilateral injection of 20 ml of Ropivacaine 3,75 mg/ml/side

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Undergoing any (scheduled) surgery of the heart (valve or coronary surgery) via a median sternotomy
* Physical status classification (ASA) ≤3
* Patients benefiting from a Social Security scheme or benefiting from it through a third party

Exclusion Criteria

* Emergency cardiac surgery
* Aortic counterpulsation
* Preoperative cardiogenic shock
* LVEF\< 30%
* Severe preoperative chronic or acute renal failure with creatinine clearance less than 30 mL / min according to the MDRD formula
* Pre-existing psychiatric pathology, including addiction to opioids
* Physical or intellectual incapacity to use a PCA
* Known allergy or hypersensitivity to any of the study drugs or analgesia protocol (ropivacaine, paracetamol, opioids)
* Contraindication for performing the paravertebral block and Erector of the spine (ESP): Infection at the site of injection, severe hemostasis disorder, thoracic spinal pathology making the procedure difficult or dangerous to operate
* Obese patient (BMI\> 30kg / m2) with poorly perceived thoracic spinous processes.
* vulnerable patients(Pregnant or breastfeeding women, persons benefiting from enhanced protection, namely persons deprived of their liberty by a judicial or administrative decision, adults under legal protection).
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

75 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Fondation Ophtalmologique Adolphe de Rothschild

NETWORK

Sponsor Role collaborator

Institut Mutualiste Montsouris

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Olivier MONTANDRAU, MD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Institut Mutualiste Montsouris

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Institut Mutualiste montsouris

Paris, , France

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

France

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

ANEST-03-2019

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

ESPB vs TPVB for Cardiac Surgery
NCT05476393 WITHDRAWN NA