Erector Spinae Plane Block Versus Paravertebral Block for Analgesia After Cardiac Surgery (PEPS)
NCT ID: NCT04546113
Last Updated: 2025-03-18
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
NA
96 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2021-01-07
2023-11-02
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Erector Spinae Plane Block and Pain Management in Cardiac Surgery
NCT03541837
Comparison of Erector Spinae Block and Pecto-Intercostal Facial Block For Enhanced Recovery in Adult Cardiac Surgery
NCT05475561
ESPB vs.Combination of ESPB and Superficial PIPB in Cardiac Surgery
NCT05191953
Comparison of Erector Spinae Plane Block With Thoracic Paravertebral Block for Video Assisted Thoracoscopic Surgery
NCT03538496
Erector Spinae Plane Block Versus Thoracic Paravertebral Block for Pain Control in Modified Radical Mastectomy
NCT04457115
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Appropriate analgesia, along with a reduction in morphine consumption are important factors in reducing morbidity after cardiac surgery and allow better postoperative rehabilitation.
Recently, the concept of multimodal analgesia has become established, which corresponds to ensuring optimal analgesia through the use of non-morphine drugs associated with locoregional analgesia.
During cardiac surgery, Paravertebral block (TPVB) technique is the first line of reference in our establishment. Lately, a new approach of blocking the intercostal nerves called Erector Spinae Plane block (ESP) has been discovered. It is a technique that seems simpler and safer than TPVB.
Until now, the analgesic efficacy of the ESP block compared to TPVB after cardiac surgery by sternotomy has never been studied.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
PREVENTION
DOUBLE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Paravertebral Block
If the patient is randomized to group Paravertebral Block, the anesthesiologist performs TPVB after induction of general anesthesia. The patient is positioned in lateral decubitus position. The anesthetist performs the bilateral paravertebral block with ultrasound identification of the paravertebral space at the T4-T5 level. Slow injection of 0.3 to 0.35 ml / kg of ropivacaine on each side (diluted to 3.75 mg / ml = dilution in a 20 ml syringe with 10 ml of ropivacaine 7.5 mg / ml and 10 ml of NaCl 0.9%) after aspiration test.
Ultrasound-guided Bilateral Paravertebral Block performed with a 20 ml injection of Ropivacaine 3,75 mg/ml/side
Bilateral injection of 20 ml of Ropivacaine 3,75 mg/ml/side
Erector Spinae Plane Block
If the patient is randomized to group "Erector Spinae Plane Block", the anesthesiologist performs the ESPb block after induction of general anesthesia. The patient is positioned in a right lateral decubitus position. The anesthesiologist performs the erector block of the spine ESP with ultrasound identification at the T4-T5 level (identify the 1st rib on ultrasound then the space T4 to T5). Slow injection of 20 ml of ropivacaine on each side (diluted to 3.75 mg / ml = dilution in a 20 ml syringe with 10 ml of ropivacaine 7.5 mg / ml and 10 ml of 0.9% NaCl) after aspiration test.
The patient is then turned in left lateral decubitus position and the contralateral block is performed according to the same procedure.
Ultrasound-guided Bilateral Erector Spinae plane Block performed with a 20 ml injection ropivacaine 3,75 mg/ml/side
Bilateral injection of 20 ml of Ropivacaine 3,75 mg/ml/side
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Ultrasound-guided Bilateral Paravertebral Block performed with a 20 ml injection of Ropivacaine 3,75 mg/ml/side
Bilateral injection of 20 ml of Ropivacaine 3,75 mg/ml/side
Ultrasound-guided Bilateral Erector Spinae plane Block performed with a 20 ml injection ropivacaine 3,75 mg/ml/side
Bilateral injection of 20 ml of Ropivacaine 3,75 mg/ml/side
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Physical status classification (ASA) ≤3
* Patients benefiting from a Social Security scheme or benefiting from it through a third party
Exclusion Criteria
* Aortic counterpulsation
* Preoperative cardiogenic shock
* LVEF\< 30%
* Severe preoperative chronic or acute renal failure with creatinine clearance less than 30 mL / min according to the MDRD formula
* Pre-existing psychiatric pathology, including addiction to opioids
* Physical or intellectual incapacity to use a PCA
* Known allergy or hypersensitivity to any of the study drugs or analgesia protocol (ropivacaine, paracetamol, opioids)
* Contraindication for performing the paravertebral block and Erector of the spine (ESP): Infection at the site of injection, severe hemostasis disorder, thoracic spinal pathology making the procedure difficult or dangerous to operate
* Obese patient (BMI\> 30kg / m2) with poorly perceived thoracic spinous processes.
* vulnerable patients(Pregnant or breastfeeding women, persons benefiting from enhanced protection, namely persons deprived of their liberty by a judicial or administrative decision, adults under legal protection).
18 Years
75 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Fondation Ophtalmologique Adolphe de Rothschild
NETWORK
Institut Mutualiste Montsouris
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Olivier MONTANDRAU, MD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Institut Mutualiste Montsouris
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Institut Mutualiste montsouris
Paris, , France
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
ANEST-03-2019
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.