Long-term Follow-up Motion Analysis of ACD Versus ACDA

NCT ID: NCT04545983

Last Updated: 2023-01-27

Basic Information

• Recruitment Status: COMPLETED
• Clinical Phase: NA
• Total Enrollment: 20 participants
• Study Classification: INTERVENTIONAL
• Study Start Date: 2022-02-12
• Study Completion Date: 2022-10-25

Brief Summary

Rationale: Cervical degenerative disc disease (CDDD) is a common cause of cervical radiculopathy, myelopathy or myeloradiculopathy. Surgical treatment is indicated when conservative therapies do not provide sufficient relief or when neurological complaints are progressive. The main surgical techniques are anterior cervical discectomy with (ACDF) or without fusion (ACD), whereas both techniques result in high fusion rates. Short term outcomes of surgery show good clinical results. Long term follow-up shows a drop-in satisfaction rates, often due to the occurrence of new complaints. Pathology is often located at levels adjacent to the previously operated segment, known as adjacent segment disease (ASDis). This is thought to be the results of loss of motion at the previously operated and fused segment. Anterior cervical discectomy with arthroplasty (ACDA) is developed in an effort to reduce the incidence of ASDis by preserving physiological motion in the operated segment.

Objective: To investigate physiological motion of the cervical spine the investigators will analyze motion patterns at the long-term in patients who underwent surgical treatment for CDDD, either ACD or ACDA.

Study design: Fundamental research. This is a prospective study that includes a cohort of patients previously operated in the setting of a randomized controlled trial.

Study population: Adult patients with an indication of surgical treatment for cervical radiculopathy as a consequence of CDDD were enrolled in an RCT between 2007 and 2014 and assigned to undergo ACD or ACDA. Flexion and extension cinematographic recordings of the cervical spine were performed, with the last one at one-year follow-up. The majority of patients in the ACDA group (80%) showed a normal sequence of segmental contribution, which was not the case in the ACD group. This cohort will now be asked to participate in the long-term follow-up study assessing the motion patterns 6-13 years after ACD or ACDA surgery.

Intervention: One flexion and extension cinematographic recording of the cervical spine and will be made.

Main study parameters/endpoints:

The sequence of segmental contributions in sagittal rotation during flexion and extension of the cervical spine will be assessed in the long-term follow-up of surgical treatment. Secondary outcomes will be to assess the amount of degeneration based on the Kellgren Score (KS) and the segmental range of motion (sROM). Long term clinical outcomes will be assessed according to VAS, NDI, SF-36 and Odom's criteria. Patients will be asked whether they have new neurological symptoms and whether they have had a re-operation.

Nature and extent of the burden and risks associated with participation, benefit and group relatedness: Participants receive cinematographic recordings once. The amount of radiation is a negligible risk. There will be no health benefits. There will be no follow-up.

Detailed Description

Cervical degenerative disc disease (CDDD) results from degeneration of cervical intervertebral disc(s) and/or the adjoining vertebral bodies. This causes clinical symptoms of cervical myelopathy, radiculopathy or myeloradiculopathy. Surgical treatment can be an option if non-surgical treatment options provide insufficient relief. The standard surgical technique for treating single or multilevel CDDD is anterior cervical discectomy, either without (ACD) or with fusion (ACDF). Both ACD and ACDF have good short-term clinical results in 90-100% of patients. Both techniques also have a high rate of fusion, respectively 70-80% and 95-100% 1. After 7-20 years, patient satisfaction slowly drops to 68-96% 2. The reason for this decline is thought to be due to the development of adjacent segment disease (ASDis). This is defined as the development of new complaints of radiculopathy or myelopathy due to degeneration one level above or below the previously operated segment. This occurs in approximately 25% of patients during 10 years follow-up and more than 2/3 of these patients need additional surgery 3. The underlying mechanism is thought to be compensation of loss of motion in the fused segment, resulting in overstraining of the adjacent segments 4. Anterior cervical discectomy with arthroplasty (ACDA) is developed in an effort to reduce the incidence of ASDis by preserving physiological motion in the operated segment.

Although the term 'physiological motion' is commonly used, a proper definition has been lacking for a long time. Segmental range of motion (sROM, e.g. the amount of sagittal rotation in a segment between maximal flexion and maximal extension position of the entire cervical spine) is most commonly used to study motion. SROM, however, suffers from large intra- and interindividual variability 5,6. Therefore, in the lower cervical spine, Boselie et al have recently described a consistent sequence of segmental contribution in sagittal rotation during flexion and extension in 80-90% of 20 healthy participants7,8. The normal sequence of segmental contributions in the lower cervical spine during the second half of extension was C4-C5 followed by C5-C6, and then C6-C7.

Moreover, Boselie et al performed a randomized controlled trial (RCT) to compare the presence of this physiological motion pattern and clinical outcomes for ACDA (n=12) and ACD (n=12) patients. Before the randomization 3 patients were operated in a pilot group (all with ACDA), so in total 27 patients with CDDD and radiculopathy were operated. In both groups 10 patients were available for follow-up at one year and fusion rate was 0% in the ACDA group and 70% in the ACD group. The majority of patients in the ACDA group (80%) showed a normal sequence of segmental contribution, which was not the case in the ACD group. This is the first method described which can reliably differentiate between normal or abnormal movement of the cervical spine in an individual subject. There were no differences in patient reported outcome measures, however the study population was small. These data have been submitted but not been published yet since follow-up duration is considered too short for most journals. The primary goal when performing the study was to analyze the sequence of segmental contribution of motion for which a follow-up duration of one year seemed appropriate. However, the expected advantage of the ACDA lies in the long-term, since it should lead to less ASDis by preserving physiological motion in the operated segment. Therefore, longer follow-up is needed to be able to determine if this physiological motion pattern remains present in the ACDA group at the long term. In the RCT performed by Boselie et al, the first patient was operated in December 2007 and the last patient in September 2014. At this moment the follow-up duration is therefore 6 to almost 13 years. By using the same method for analyzing the sequence of segmental contribution of motion in the cervical spine 8, the investigators want to analyze these 27 patients again in the long-term (at an average follow up of 9 years).

The investigators hypothesize that normal motion of the cervical spine will also be preserved by ACDA at the long-term, whereas ACD shows a decline in motion due to the induced fusion at the operated segment. As a consequence, the investigators expect ACDA to induce a lower risk on developing ASDis and thus re-operations.

Conditions

Cervical Myelopathy; Cervical Radiculopathy; Spinal Stenosis; Spinal Disease; Spine Degeneration; Spine Fusion

Study Design

• Allocation Method: RANDOMIZED
• Intervention Model: PARALLEL
• Primary Study Purpose: BASIC_SCIENCE
• Blinding Strategy: NONE

Study Groups

ACD

In the previously conducted RCT 27 adult patients with an indication for ACD because of a monoradicular syndrome, corresponding to the C5-C6 or C6-C7 level, with corresponding pathology on MRI, were included and randomized to undergo ACD or ACDA.

Group Type: ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Motion Analysis

Intervention Type: OTHER

Cinematographic recordings will be made. Participants are seated on a crutch, adjustable in height, with their neck, shoulders and head free. Before recordings are made, participants will be instructed to perform the prescribed flexion and extension movement in about 10 seconds with 7 frames per second. Participants are placed on the crutch with their shoulder's perpendicular to the image intensifier to obtain sagittal images from the occiput till C7. As soon as the recording is started, the participant is instructed to move his head in the sagittal plane from maximal extension to maximal flexion, without moving the upper part of the body. It is important that the participants shoulders are kept as low as possible while making the recordings to ensure that all the cervical vertebrae are visible. The movement of the cervical spine should be as fluent as possible to prevent for sudden large rotations and translations between consecutive frames.

ACDA

In the previously conducted RCT 27 adult patients with an indication for ACD because of a monoradicular syndrome, corresponding to the C5-C6 or C6-C7 level, with corresponding pathology on MRI, were included and randomized to undergo ACD or ACDA.

Group Type: EXPERIMENTAL

Motion Analysis

Intervention Type: OTHER

Cinematographic recordings will be made. Participants are seated on a crutch, adjustable in height, with their neck, shoulders and head free. Before recordings are made, participants will be instructed to perform the prescribed flexion and extension movement in about 10 seconds with 7 frames per second. Participants are placed on the crutch with their shoulder's perpendicular to the image intensifier to obtain sagittal images from the occiput till C7. As soon as the recording is started, the participant is instructed to move his head in the sagittal plane from maximal extension to maximal flexion, without moving the upper part of the body. It is important that the participants shoulders are kept as low as possible while making the recordings to ensure that all the cervical vertebrae are visible. The movement of the cervical spine should be as fluent as possible to prevent for sudden large rotations and translations between consecutive frames.

Interventions

Motion Analysis

Cinematographic recordings will be made. Participants are seated on a crutch, adjustable in height, with their neck, shoulders and head free. Before recordings are made, participants will be instructed to perform the prescribed flexion and extension movement in about 10 seconds with 7 frames per second. Participants are placed on the crutch with their shoulder's perpendicular to the image intensifier to obtain sagittal images from the occiput till C7. As soon as the recording is started, the participant is instructed to move his head in the sagittal plane from maximal extension to maximal flexion, without moving the upper part of the body. It is important that the participants shoulders are kept as low as possible while making the recordings to ensure that all the cervical vertebrae are visible. The movement of the cervical spine should be as fluent as possible to prevent for sudden large rotations and translations between consecutive frames.

Intervention Type: OTHER

Eligibility Criteria

Inclusion Criteria

• An indication for ACD because of a monoradicular syndrome, corresponding to the C5-C6 or C6-C7 level, with corresponding pathology on MRI.
• Aged 18-55 years.
• Able to actively perform flexion/extension movement.
• Able to read the information form and sign IC.

• All participants of previous RCT
• Able to perform flexion/extension movement of the cervical spine
• Signed IC.

Patients were excluded in the previous RCT based on the following criteria, and will now be excluded based on the same criteria:

• Ongoing or active infection.
• Previous or actual tumorous processes in the cervical region.
• Pregnancy.
• Previous radiation therapy in the cervical region.
• Not being able to speak Dutch.

• Eligible Sex: ALL
• Accepts Healthy Volunteers: No

Sponsors

Zuyderland Medisch Centrum

OTHER

Sponsor Role: lead

Responsible Party

Responsibility Role: SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Henk Van Santbrink, Md, PhD, Professor

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Zuyderland Medisch Centrum

Locations

Zuyderland Medisch Centrum

Heerlen, Limburg, Netherlands

Countries

Netherlands

Other Identifiers

Z2020101

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id