Pharmacist for Detecting Opioid Misuse

NCT ID: NCT04544696

Last Updated: 2020-09-14

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Total Enrollment

414 participants

Study Classification

OBSERVATIONAL

Study Start Date

2019-04-17

Study Completion Date

2019-06-01

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Opioid use is increasing in Western countries and is associated with harms as hospitalization, addiction and deaths(1). Community pharmacists interact frequently with patients, giving them the opportunity to identify and prevent the risk of prescribed opioid misuse. The purpose of this study was therefore to assess the risk of prescribed opioids misuse in ambulatory patients with chronic non-cancer pain (CNCP) seen in community pharmacies.

Method: A questionnaire (including the Prescription Opioid Misuse POMI(2)) have been proposed to patients with opioid prescription by pharmacy students, in 86 pharmacies of Occitanie-Est, in April 2019. Eligible patients were adults with CNCP that consented to participate.

A total of 414 patients (62.4% women, mean age 58 ± 16.00) have been included. The main pains were spinal (37.3%) and osteoarticular (33.1%). The median visual analog scale (VAS) was 7 \[IQR25-75: 5-8\]. The prescribed opioids are mainly weak opioids (73.2%): paracetamol/tramadol (35%), paracetamol/codeine (17.4%), paracetamol/opium (16.8%). Strong opioids (32.6%) were oxycodone (11.95%), fentanyl (9%), and morphine (9%). The median morphine milligram equivalent (MME) was 40 mg/day \[IQR25-75: 20-80\].

POMI score was superior to 2/6 in 45.4% and superior to 4 in 16%. The main positive question were feel high (40.3%), take the opioid more often (39.3%), take more medication (36.6), and need to early renew opioid medication earlier (30.8%).

Patients with POMI score \> 4 were younger (49 years versus 55.9; p\<0.01), more urban (78.1% versus 69.2%; p=0.03), had higher VAS (7.3 versus 6.2; p\<0.01), received higher median MME (112 mg versus 64.9 mg; p\<0.01), and consumed more strong opioid (45.3% versus 27.3%; p=0.04).

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Chronic Non Cancer Pain

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Observational Model Type

OTHER

Study Time Perspective

CROSS_SECTIONAL

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Patients with chronic non cancer pain

Patients with chronic non cancer pain, treated with opioids and having completed the POMi questionnaire

No interventions assigned to this group

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* -Collection of the questionnaire in a community pharmacy of the area of investigation East-Occitania)
* Patient over 18 years of age
* Suffering from pain (CNCP) (\> 3 months old)
* Treated with weak or strong opioids

Exclusion Criteria

* Collection of the questionnaire in a community pharmacy outside Eastern Occitania
* Patient under 18 years of age
* Suffering from acute pain (\< 3 months old) or cancerous pain
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

University Hospital, Montpellier

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Hélène Peyrière, PH

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

UH Montpellier

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Uhmontpellier

Montpellier, , France

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

France

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

RECHMPL20_0433

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.