Cross-cultural Validation of a Screening Scale for the Misuse of Opioid Analgesics in Primary Care
NCT ID: NCT05431985
Last Updated: 2022-06-24
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
160 participants
OBSERVATIONAL
2017-01-01
2019-07-01
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Study Setting: Patients with chronic pain, taking AOs for at least 3 months, and followed in general practice.
Study design: Psychometric study
Data Collection/Extraction methods: Eligible patients followed in general practice responded to the POMI: Test phase. They then responded after 2 weeks: the retest. The gold standard used was the DSM-V.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Validation of a Screening Scale for Misuse of Opioid Analgesics
NCT05761587
French Version of POMI Scale
NCT04979364
Pharmacist for Detecting Opioid Misuse
NCT04544696
Dependence on Analgesics in Chronic Non-cancer Pain
NCT03346408
Primary Dependence to Analgesic Drugs
NCT03684317
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
In 2015, nearly one in five French people (17,1%) of French people have taken opioid treatment. The risk of opioid use disorder secondary to opioid analgesics among patients suffering from chronic pain varies from 0% to 50%. American recommendations advocate periodic surveillance of this opioid use disorder depending on the patient's risk factors, when chronic opioid analgesics are prescribed. The French "Limoges" recommendations also mention a systematic search for signs of psychological dependence during treatment and state that treatment with strong opioids should be stopped in the event of misuse, abuse or addiction. They recommend, on each examination, the investigation for signs of misuse or psychological dependence (characterised by craving) as ways of monitoring that strong opioids are being correctly used in chronic osteo-articular pain.
Identifying the misuse is a way of optimising their benefit/risk ratio
The difficulty in establishing the prevalence of misuse is due to a lack of standardization of studies and the lack of consensus in the use of assessment tools. Several tools are available internationally. The only diagnostic criteria available are those of the DSM-5 (Fifth Edition of the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders) or the ICD-10 which overestimate this prevalence notably by the presence of frequent tolerance and withdrawal criteria for these patients, in the absence of misuse or addiction. Today, no screening scale has been validated in France for primary care, but recently, the authors have validated the POMI scale in French to screen the patients specifically followed in pain clinic and presenting a misuse behavior of their opioid analgesic treatment. In 2015, treatment initiation was carried out by a GP in 59.1% of cases for weak opioid and 62.9% of cases for strong opioids and by a hospital doctor for 20.1% and 21% respectively7. Currently, no scale was validated in primary care. A scale validated in French would make it possible to standardize these screening practices and secure prescription both from the point of view of the doctor and of the patient. Furthermore, this absence of a validated tool in French is proving to be an obstacle to the development of true pharmaco-epidemiological studies on the prevalence of the opioids misuse. The originality of this study is to assess the clinical relevance of the french transcultural validation of the POMI scale in primary care in order to ensure an appropriate and relevant use by all health professionals and to allow large-scale screening for the misuse behavior of analgesic opioids.
The aim of the study was a validation of the French version of the Prescription Opioid Misuse Index - POMI patients with chronic pain in general practitioners setting.
Secondary objective
* To study the profile of participants with misuse of opioid analgesics.
* To compare the results of this study with the previous study on patients followed in pain clinic.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
COHORT
CROSS_SECTIONAL
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Patients with chronic pain for at least 6 months,
* Patients with a prescription from the GP of at least one Opioid analgesic drug taken daily for at least the previous 3 months,
* Patients registered with the French insurance system.
Exclusion Criteria
* Patients in the process of withdrawal (risk of having been withdrawn during the Retest phase),
* Patients unable to complete the questionnaire alone,
* Patients who are monitored by a pain clinic or addiction centre,
* Patients with ongoing cancer,
* Patients refusing to participate.
18 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
University Hospital, Clermont-Ferrand
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
CHU Clermont-Ferrand, UMR INSERM 1107, NEURO-DOL
Clermont-Ferrand, , France
Département de médecine Générale, Facultés de Médecine de Clermont-Ferrand
Clermont-Ferrand, , France
Département de médecine générale, Lyon
Lyon, , France
Département de médecine générale, Faculté de médecine, Montpellier
Montpellier, , France
Département de médecine générale, Faculté de médecine, Toulouse
Toulouse, , France
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
2015 LAPORTE
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.