Evaluation of an Opioid Decrease Strategy in Chronic

NCT ID: NCT04424459

Last Updated: 2020-12-29

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Total Enrollment

8 participants

Study Classification

OBSERVATIONAL

Study Start Date

2019-10-01

Study Completion Date

2020-07-30

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Increase in the consumption of analgesics observed in many countries with a mediatic crisis resulting in an increasingly frequent wish of patients to wean themselves from opiates. A recent update (B. Rolland 2017) suggests that upon initiation of an opioid analgesic treatment, the patient should be informed of the risk of opioid dependence and misuse. There is no clearly validated decay scheme in the event of dependence in patients with Chronic Non-Cancer Pain.

Hypotheses:

* Possibility of a rapid decrease in opioid analgesic treatments at DCNC sensitized to the risk of DOP and MOP. (Protocol implemented: Multidisciplinary assessment, workshops and information sheet on chronic pain, treatments and risk of DOP, pharmacological and nonpharmacological adaptation)
* Highlight the need for additional information from patients and prescribers on the risk of DOP and MOP in DCNC.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Main objective: Check if the rapid to semi-rapid regimen (- 25 to -60% dosage in 5 days of HDS) of opioid analgesics, without the use of methadone or buprenorphine agonists, in the case of DCNC at the CETD in Montpellier is efficient in the medium term (6 months).

Secondary objective:

* With our inclusion questionnaire we wanted to check if the patients had been made aware of the risk of opiate dependence and misuse.
* Detect the conditions of prescriptions that can promote the misuse of opiates.
* Evaluating the different components of residual pain at 6 months (type, intensity, anxiety component and depression, function).

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Chronic Pain

Keywords

Explore important study keywords that can help with search, categorization, and topic discovery.

Opioid analgesics Opioid use disorders Prescription drug abuse treatments Prevention Identification

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Observational Model Type

CASE_CONTROL

Study Time Perspective

PROSPECTIVE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Patients included from 10/01/19 to 12/31/19.

Patients included from 10/01/19 to 12/31/19. (the study will be extended to a larger number of patients according to the first results), continued according to the first results. DCNC patients treated at the Montpellier Pain Assessment and Treatment Center hospitalized during the period from 10/01/19 to 12/31/19, for misuse of opioid treatment.

opioid withdrawal

Intervention Type DRUG

The data retrieved from the patient will be encrypted and there will also be written data or written in binary form. They will be used to create an Excel table which allows me to list the data on D1 then on M + 3 then on M + 6 in order to evaluate the evolution of these data over a time interval of 6 months and this is which will be used as support in my thesis in pharmacy.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

opioid withdrawal

The data retrieved from the patient will be encrypted and there will also be written data or written in binary form. They will be used to create an Excel table which allows me to list the data on D1 then on M + 3 then on M + 6 in order to evaluate the evolution of these data over a time interval of 6 months and this is which will be used as support in my thesis in pharmacy.

Intervention Type DRUG

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* chronic pain patient
* major
* supported at CETD

Exclusion Criteria

-patient with physical and mental incapacity to participate in the study
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

University Hospital, Montpellier

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Théa GENDARME, MD, PharmD, MSc

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

UH Montpellier

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Uhmontpellier

Montpellier, , France

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

France

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

RECHMPL20_0132

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id