Brainwave Activity Response on Common Physical Therapy Intervention

NCT ID: NCT04542707

Last Updated: 2025-08-07

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

150 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2020-08-20

Study Completion Date

2025-07-01

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

This study is designed to evaluate the if there is a predictable patterns in brainwave activity and to see how this changes with external physical therapy interventions such as manipulation, soft tissue massage, and exercise.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

This study is designed to evaluate the how the brain responds to external stimulation. Patients with chronic pain can benefit from physical therapy treatments, such as manipulation, soft tissue massage, and exercise. This study is made up of three different phases.

In the first phase to objective is to identify if there is a typical resting brain wave activity (measured with EEG) in asymptomatic subjects. In the second phase of the project the subjects will undergo physical therapy interventions and the brain wave response will be measured. The interventions are chosen based on the fact that they have been demonstrated in the literature to decrease pain.

Joint manipulation is a manual therapy intervention used with patients that experience pain and decreased range of motion. When undergoing a manipulation, audible sounds often occurring with the manipulation and sometimes this does not occur. In the current literature there is a difference between the effects of spinal manipulation and manipulation of the joints in the extremities. For that reason, this study will evaluate the response in both. It is not clear in the current literature if the audible sound has a true therapeutic effect. It is possible that patient perception of this sound will create a specific brainwave response pattern. This might support the clinician's pursuit of the audible sound.

Exercise has been shown to decrease pain, stiffness and increase ROM. Overall exercise contributes to wellbeing. There are different types of exercise such as strength exercise, aerobic exercise (aiming at increasing your heart rate) and body/ mind exercises (Yoga). In this phase of the study brainwave response on each of these types of exercises will be evaluated.

Soft tissue massage is a modality that has been shown to increase blood flow and decrease pain. This change in pain perception should lead to an altered brain wave activity.

As part of the phase the brain wave response on joint manipulation, exercise, and soft tissue massage on asymptomatic subjects will be measured and compared to each other. The hypothesis is that there will be a predictable pattern of brain response in each intervention.

The third phase of this study is to repeat the measures and intervention in subjects that experience pain. The hypothesis is that there is an altered brainwave response compared to the asymptomatic group. Additionally, in this phase the investigators will measure the brainwave response of FGCU college athletes who sprained their ankle within three days of the injury.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Pain

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

NON_RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

SINGLE_GROUP

This experiment will be cross sectional study. Convenience sampling technique asymptomatic healthy subjects
Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

DOUBLE

Investigators Outcome Assessors
The treating clinician will not be aware off the brainwave and pupilometry data

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Joint manipulation

Grade V-Thrust manipulation with audible sound and without audible sounds of C1-C2, T7, MTP 2 and MCP2 joints.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

joint manipulation

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Thrust manipulation to the spine, hand, and foot

Exercise

Aerobic, anaerobic, and yoga exercises

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Exercise

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Strength training, bike aerobic training, and yoga exercise

Soft tissue massage

Instrument assisted soft tissue massage

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Soft tissue massage

Intervention Type DEVICE

Graston tool

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

joint manipulation

Thrust manipulation to the spine, hand, and foot

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Exercise

Strength training, bike aerobic training, and yoga exercise

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Soft tissue massage

Graston tool

Intervention Type DEVICE

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Subjects will be between the ages of 18-60.
* The subjects for the manipulation group should have no history of thoracic spine pain in the last 6 months, no thoracic spine injuries within the past 6 months.
* The subjects for the exercise groups should be novice exercisers that do not workout often and can tolerate a 15 minute moderate intensity exercises.

Exclusion Criteria

* A history of concussion, traumatic brain injury, stroke, or any known central nervous system disorder TBI, or brain damage.
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

65 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Florida Gulf Coast University

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Dr. Rob Sillevis,

Assistant Professor

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Rob Sillevis

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

FGCU

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Florida Gulf Coast University

Fort Myers, Florida, United States

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United States

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

2020-64

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

Ankle Sprains and Corticospinal Excitability
NCT00847769 COMPLETED PHASE1/PHASE2