Validation of the Gugging Swallowing Screen for the Intensive Care Unit

NCT ID: NCT04532398

Last Updated: 2021-02-09

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

45 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2020-08-27

Study Completion Date

2021-02-08

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Aetiology of dysphagia after extubation is unknown and considered to be multifactorial. Use of a standardized dysphagia- screening permits an early diagnosis. This study is to evaluate a new GUSS (gugging swallowing Screen) tool with multi-consistency check for intensive care patients (GUSS-ICU) with dysphagia. The concurrent validity (in terms of sensitivity and specificity) of the GUSS-ICU is analyzed in comparison to the flexible endoscopic evaluation of swallowing (FEES).

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Aetiology of dysphagia after extubation is unknown and considered to be multifactorial. Use of a standardized dysphagia- screening permits an early diagnosis. This study is to evaluate a new GUSS (gugging swallowing Screen) tool with multi-consistency check for intensive care patients (GUSS-ICU) with dysphagia. The concurrent validity (in terms of sensitivity and specificity) of the GUSS-ICU is analyzed in comparison to the flexible endoscopic evaluation of swallowing (FEES).

The GUSS-ICU with multi-consistency check includes an indirect and a direct swallowing attempt. In indirect swallowing, the vigilance is first assessed on the basis of the RASS score (Richmond agitation-sedation scale), the presence of a stridor, the effectiveness of coughing and screeting, the possibility of swallowing saliva, drooling (saliva) and the change of voice after swallowing. If six points are reached, one can immediately proceed to the direct swallowing attempt. Unlike the original GUSS, the new GUSS-ICU direct swallowing test consists of 4 subtests with pulpy, liquid, solid and mixed solid-liquid consistency. The mixed solid-liquid consistency has been supplemented, as mixed consistencies require a more complex swallowing function with increased tongue- and lip coordination.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Dysphagia

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

NA

Intervention Model

SINGLE_GROUP

Primary Study Purpose

OTHER

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Swallowing test

Group Type OTHER

Gugging swallowing screen - ICU (GUSS-ICU) index test

Intervention Type OTHER

Gugging swallowing screen - ICU (GUSS-ICU) index test:

Screening for post-extubation dysphagia: GUSS-ICU performed by 2 speech therapists independently. The GUSS-ICU model contains the core features of the original GUSS tool with the added assessment items specific to the ICU Patient (RASS score (Richmond Agitation and Sedation Scale)).

Stage one of the screen focuses on the preliminary investigation of indirect swallowing. Stage two is comprised of varying steps that directly test swallowing. This would include the administration of semisolids, water and bread with four distinct signs that were being assessed for - deglutition, coughing, drooling and voice change. The GUSS test is evaluated using a points system (0-10) which determines the severity of dysphagia and recommends a diet form that largely minimizes the risk of aspiration. (e.g. 10 points: No dysphagia = normal food).

Flexible Endoscopic Evaluation of Swallowing (FEES) reference test

Intervention Type OTHER

Flexible Endoscopic Evaluation of Swallowing (FEES) reference test:

Flexible Endoscopic Evaluation of Swallowing (FEES) is a technique to directly view the pharynx, larynx and esophagus during swallowing. The swallowing test is carried out first with saliva and then with different consistency (liquid, pulpy, solid) and different sized swallowing portions. This reference test is performed independently from the GUSS-ICU index test.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Gugging swallowing screen - ICU (GUSS-ICU) index test

Gugging swallowing screen - ICU (GUSS-ICU) index test:

Screening for post-extubation dysphagia: GUSS-ICU performed by 2 speech therapists independently. The GUSS-ICU model contains the core features of the original GUSS tool with the added assessment items specific to the ICU Patient (RASS score (Richmond Agitation and Sedation Scale)).

Stage one of the screen focuses on the preliminary investigation of indirect swallowing. Stage two is comprised of varying steps that directly test swallowing. This would include the administration of semisolids, water and bread with four distinct signs that were being assessed for - deglutition, coughing, drooling and voice change. The GUSS test is evaluated using a points system (0-10) which determines the severity of dysphagia and recommends a diet form that largely minimizes the risk of aspiration. (e.g. 10 points: No dysphagia = normal food).

Intervention Type OTHER

Flexible Endoscopic Evaluation of Swallowing (FEES) reference test

Flexible Endoscopic Evaluation of Swallowing (FEES) reference test:

Flexible Endoscopic Evaluation of Swallowing (FEES) is a technique to directly view the pharynx, larynx and esophagus during swallowing. The swallowing test is carried out first with saliva and then with different consistency (liquid, pulpy, solid) and different sized swallowing portions. This reference test is performed independently from the GUSS-ICU index test.

Intervention Type OTHER

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* patients treated in ICU with intubation time of at least 24 hours
* Richmond Agitation-Sedation Scale (RASS)-Score of 0 (alert and calm) to 2 (agitated)
* Inclusion in study not earlier than 1 hour after extubation
* Mini-Mental-State (MMS) Score \>/=24
* signed informed consent

Exclusion Criteria

* not capable to follow study procedures (language problems, mental disorder)
* end of life- patients
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

University Hospital, Basel, Switzerland

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Claudia Troll

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Logopädie (speech therapy), University Hospital Basel

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Logopädie, University Hospital Basel

Basel, , Switzerland

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Switzerland

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Troll C, Trapl-Grundschober M, Teuschl Y, Cerrito A, Compte MG, Siegemund M. A bedside swallowing screen for the identification of post-extubation dysphagia on the intensive care unit - validation of the Gugging Swallowing Screen (GUSS)-ICU. BMC Anesthesiol. 2023 Apr 13;23(1):122. doi: 10.1186/s12871-023-02072-6.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 37055724 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

2020-01555; qu20Siegemund

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

Oral Care Apparatus for Intubated Patients
NCT06709183 ENROLLING_BY_INVITATION NA