Ultrasound Guided Closed Reduction of Depressed Zygomatic Arch Fractures

NCT ID: NCT04528264

Last Updated: 2020-10-14

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

UNKNOWN

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

100 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2021-06-30

Study Completion Date

2022-08-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Zygomatic arch fractures have always been treated with blind closed reduction and is the most commonly used method. Blind reduction of fractures might lead to inadequate reduction and associated complications of facial asymmetry and limitations in mouth opening which may require reoperation for correction. Various methods like portable CT scan, C arm fluoroscopy, endoscopy and ultrasound have been proposed and used to visualize the reduction for better outcome. Out of these, ultrasound is inexpensive, easily available, easy to use, non-ionizing and has greatest potential to be used as standard for visual reduction of zygomatic arch fractures. There are studies where ultrasound has been compared to blind method and other modalities but level I evidence and recommended protocol for its intraoperative use has been lacking.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Isolated and depressed zygomatic arch fractures have an incidence of about 5 to 14% of lateral mid face fractures. Depressed zygomatic arch fractures have been managed by blind closed reduction historically based upon tactile sense of surgeon and auditory click assumed as the conclusive evidence of reduction. The minimal fracture exposure for zygomatic arch fractures either solitary or combined with zygomaticomaxillary complex fractures results in inadequate visibility of the fractures and inadequate or inappropriate reduction of fractures. These fractures can be visualized by surgical exposure with coronal approach but is limited by complications and extensive training required. Other options are intraoperative imaging with portable CT scan but they are cumbersome, require radiologists for positioning and are not available in all operative units as well as expensive. Endoscopic visualization and reduction are another option for intraoperative control of these fractures but endoscopes are expensive, not available in all operative units and require experience and training to use appropriately. Various studies and our own experience show that unacceptable number of depressed zygomatic arch fractures remain incompletely reduced with blind reduction method. The resulting deficit might be as small as a depressed lateral face, inadequate sagittal projection of cheek to inadequate mouth opening. Portable ultrasound machines are readily available in almost all anesthesia units and operating rooms. These ultrasound units can be utilized to reduce the zygomatic arch satisfactorily with real time image guidance and it has advantage of being radiation free and inexpensive compared to fluoroscopy based portable C arm units. A small pilot in our own unit has shown remarkable difference between reduction achieved under ultrasonography guidance vs closed reduction based on tactility. This method should be explored and perfected to bring in common use among Oral \& Maxillofacial surgeons so that blind assumption of fracture reduction is replaced by a more scientific confirmation of fracture reduction.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Zygomatic Arch Fracture

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Randomized double blind
Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

DOUBLE

Participants Outcome Assessors
Sealed Envelope will be used to conceal allocation. Patients will be unaware of their group allocation. Outcome assessor will be blinded to the group allocation.

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Ultrasound guided

Intraoperative high frequency ultrasound used to guide the reduction of depressed zygomatic arch.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Intraoperative ultrasound guided

Intervention Type DEVICE

Samsung Mysono U6 machine with LN 15 linear (https://www.samsunghealthcare.com/en/products/UltrasoundSystem/MySono%20U6/General%20Imaging/transducers) probe capable of Musculoskeletal imaging will be used for visualization and location of fracture after which elevation and reduction of fracture will be attempted. The ultrasound probe will be used as described by McCann. Radiographic continuity of periosteal shadow without any step will be taken as end point for reduction and the procedure will be terminated.

Conventional blind reduction technique

Conventional blind reduction of zygomatic arch fracture will be conducted without any intraoperative imaging.

Group Type OTHER

Conventional blind reduction technique

Intervention Type OTHER

Conventional blind reduction technique

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Intraoperative ultrasound guided

Samsung Mysono U6 machine with LN 15 linear (https://www.samsunghealthcare.com/en/products/UltrasoundSystem/MySono%20U6/General%20Imaging/transducers) probe capable of Musculoskeletal imaging will be used for visualization and location of fracture after which elevation and reduction of fracture will be attempted. The ultrasound probe will be used as described by McCann. Radiographic continuity of periosteal shadow without any step will be taken as end point for reduction and the procedure will be terminated.

Intervention Type DEVICE

Conventional blind reduction technique

Conventional blind reduction technique

Intervention Type OTHER

Other Intervention Names

Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.

Intraoperative USG Imaging comparator

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* 6 years and above
* fractured and depressed zygomatic arch requiring surgical reduction

Exclusion Criteria

* pregnant patients
* not willing for participation
* below 6 years age
Minimum Eligible Age

6 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

College of Medical Sciences Teaching Hospital. Nepal

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Ashutosh Kumar Singh

Associate Professor

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Ashutosh K Singh, MDS

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

College of Medical Sciences, Nepal

Central Contacts

Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.

Ashutosh K Singh, MDS

Role: CONTACT

+9779804244369

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

CMSNepal

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.