Mesotherapy Versus Systemic Therapyin Treatment of Migraine Headache

NCT ID: NCT04519346

Last Updated: 2020-08-19

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

150 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2019-12-01

Study Completion Date

2020-05-01

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Introduction:Migraine is a prevalent disabling primary headache disorder which is classified in two major types; migraine without aura and migraine with aura. The aim of this study was to compare the efficiency of mesotherapy with systemic therapy in pain controlin patients with headache related tomigraine without aura.

Methods: We conducted this prospective parallel randomized controlled trial with the patients admitted to the emergency department with headache related to migraine without aura. One group was treated with mesotherapy, and the control group with intravenous dexketoprofen. Changes in pain intensity at 30th minute, 60th minute, 120th minute and 24th hours after treatment using Visual Analogue Scale (VAS), need to use analgesic drug within 24 hours,re-admission with same complaint to emergency department (ED) within 72 hours, and adverse effect rate of the methods were compared between groups.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Migraine Headache

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

NA

Intervention Model

SINGLE_GROUP

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Compare to sistemic treatment and mesotherapy.

This is a prospective parallel randomized controlled trial conducted with patients admitted to our emergency department with migraine pain

Group Type OTHER

intradermal injection

Intervention Type OTHER

Mesotherapy was performed by an experienced and trained physician using disposable 4 mm and 6 mm long 30 Gauge needles (Meso-relle, Biotekne SRL, Italy)to the pericarotid region, glabella, and the area between the eyes and ears, and to the area of the head where pain occurred (such as frontal, parietal, occipital region) for each patient

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

intradermal injection

Mesotherapy was performed by an experienced and trained physician using disposable 4 mm and 6 mm long 30 Gauge needles (Meso-relle, Biotekne SRL, Italy)to the pericarotid region, glabella, and the area between the eyes and ears, and to the area of the head where pain occurred (such as frontal, parietal, occipital region) for each patient

Intervention Type OTHER

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* 18 years and older age, and (2)
* Admission to Emergency Department (ED) with headache related to the migraine without aura.

Exclusion Criteria

* Taking analgesic drugs before admission,
* Having VAS score of lower than 4 on admission,
* Having diabetes mellitus,
* Body mass index\>30 kg/m2,
* Pregnancy,
* Lactation,
* Having active bleeding or bleeding disorder,
* Having active or recurrent gastrointestinal hemorrhage or ulcer, or history of these conditions,
* Having a serious or life-threatening condition (stroke, intracranial hemorrhage, heart attack, cardiac tamponade, pneumothorax, hemothorax, flail chest, etc.).
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Ataturk University

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Abdullah Osman KOCAK

Principal Investigator

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Ataturk University

Erzurum, , Turkey (Türkiye)

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Turkey (Türkiye)

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Akbas I, Kocak MB, Kocak AO, Gur STA, Dogruyol S, Demir M, Cakir Z. Intradermal mesotherapy versus intravenous dexketoprofen for the treatment of migraine headache without aura: a randomized controlled trial. Ann Saudi Med. 2021 May-Jun;41(3):127-134. doi: 10.5144/0256-4947.2021.127. Epub 2021 Jun 1.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 34085549 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

AtaturkU0002

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.