Study Results
Outcome measurements, participant flow, baseline characteristics, and adverse events have been published for this study.
View full resultsBasic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
NA
4 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2020-11-12
2022-12-01
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
TheraSphere for the Treatment of Liver Metastases
NCT00511862
Intra-arterial Y-90 TheraSpheres for Hepatic Metastases From Solid Tumors
NCT01177007
Yttrium-90 Radioembolization With Glass Microspheres (TheraSphere) for Patients With Hepatocellular Carcinoma
NCT01290523
Radiolabeled Glass Beads (TheraSphere®) in Treating Patients With Primary Liver Cancer That Cannot Be Removed by Surgery
NCT00039078
Therasphere® for Treatment of Unresectable Primary Liver Cancer and Metastatic Liver Cancer
NCT00701168
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
TARE therapy of liver neoplasia using 90Y-theraspheres has a long history. The device is FDA approved for the treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma, but has been used extensively for treatment of secondary liver neoplasia, including metastatic colorectal lesions under Humanitarian Device Exemption protocols such as this one.
As a targeted radioactive therapy, the current TARE implementation suffers from a lack of efficiency characteristic of radiopharmaceutical therapy (RPT) in general; namely, that the activity determined to treat the patient is not optimized according to normal organ tolerated absorbed dose and tumor efficacy thresholds. The amount of activity to be administered is determined from volumetrics established from associated imaging, either MRI or X-ray CT, where the total volume of irradiated tissue is considered as irrigated by the artery selected for administration, including both tumor and normal organ tissue. From this volume determination, the activity necessary to deliver an average pre-determined safe absorbed dose (120 Gy) to the entire irradiated region is calculated and administered.
In RPT, in the theranostic paradigm, a pre-therapeutic, or surrogate, quantity of activity is administered to the patient; 3D imaging (SPECT/CT or PET/CT) is then acquired at several time points and the individual patient's pharmacokinetics are determined, the normal organ and tumor dosimetry are performed and the optimal administered activity calculated that will deliver safe and efficacious treatment for the individual patient is determined, generally limited by the normal organ at risk maximum tolerated dose.
TARE presents a number of unique characteristics that enable a simpler version of this approach than is typical for most RPT. The method of administration means that only the normal liver and lungs need to be considered as potential organs at risk as the microspheres embolize and do not circulate systemically; the lack of associated photons in the 90Y decay chain means that a simple activity-to-dose-rate conversion can be used; the embolization means that only a single imaging time point is necessary as there is no redistribution of activity over time and the dose rate is converted to absorbed dose using the physical decay parameters of 90Y. These natural simplifications are already exploited in the current volumetric paradigm, where a 99mTc-macro albumin aggregate (MAA) surrogate and planar imaging are used to determine the fraction of total activity that is shunted to the lung and where a derived conversion factor is used to convert activity to absorbed dose.
The technical complication in TARE is that the surrogate (99mTc-MAA) has a different nature from the therapeutic device (90Y-theraspheres), and thus the reliability of the predictive quality of the surrogate is disputed. However, with precise and advanced imaging reconstruction and dosimetry the investigators have shown the ability to accurately and precisely predict normal liver and tumor average 90Y-therasphere uptake and absorbed dose from 99mTc-MAA.
This protocol seeks to acquire the imaging information from 3-5 patients that will demonstrate feasibility of future implementation of personal dosimetry-based treatment planning for TARE. In addition to the clinical standard of care assessments: 1. a single SPECT/CT instead of the current planar image will be acquired of the surrogate 99mTc-MAA; 2. An additional single 3D image (either SPECT/CT or PET/CT, depending on machine availability) will be acquired up to 6 hours post-administration of the therapeutic 90Y-microspheres for comparison. Informed consent will be obtained.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
NA
SINGLE_GROUP
OTHER
NONE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Therasphere Therapy
All participants will receive the Therasphere Therapy.
Therasphere Therapy
TheraSphere is a radiotherapy treatment for primary and secondary liver neoplasia. This is an imaging study that will examine 3-5 patients who have been treated for metastatic colorectal cancer in the liver using TheraSphere®. Participation in the study involves an additional post-treatment SPECT/CT or PET/CT scan at (0-6) hours.
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Therasphere Therapy
TheraSphere is a radiotherapy treatment for primary and secondary liver neoplasia. This is an imaging study that will examine 3-5 patients who have been treated for metastatic colorectal cancer in the liver using TheraSphere®. Participation in the study involves an additional post-treatment SPECT/CT or PET/CT scan at (0-6) hours.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Patients with a diagnosis of metastatic colorectal cancer to the liver
* Liver metastases are unresectable
* Tumors are hypervascular based on visual estimation by the Investigator
* Target tumors are measurable using standard imaging techniques
* Performance Status Score 0 - 2
* Age ≥18 years
* Life expectancy ≥3 months
* \>4 weeks since prior radiation, surgery or chemotherapy
* Able to comprehend and provide written informed consent in accordance with institutional and federal guidelines
* At least one month has elapsed since most recent prior cancer therapy with the following exception:
* Patient is willing to participate in the study and has signed the study informed consent
Exclusion Criteria
* Any pre-treatment laboratory findings within 15 days of treatment demonstrating liver dysfunction:
* Blood test result levels outside of the normal range
* Any history of hepatic encephalopathy
* Any contraindications to angiography and hepatic artery catheterization such as:
* History of severe allergy or intolerance to any contrast media, narcotics, sedatives or atropine that cannot be corrected or premedicated
* Bleeding diathesis, not correctable by usual forms of therapy
* Severe peripheral vascular disease that would preclude catheterization.
* Evidence of pulmonary insufficiency
* Significant extrahepatic disease representing an imminent life-threatening outcome
* Active uncontrolled infection
* Significant underlying medical or psychiatric illness
* Co-morbid disease or condition that would preclude safe delivery of TheraSphere® treatment or, in the judgment of the physician, place the patient at undue risk
* Pregnancy
* Special Categories of Patients: Not applicable
* Research in Mentally Disabled People: No. All participants or legal guardians will be fully able to give informed consent.
18 Years
100 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center at Johns Hopkins
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Robert Hobbs, PhD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Johns Hopkins University
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
The Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center at Johns Hopkins
Baltimore, Maryland, United States
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Provided Documents
Download supplemental materials such as informed consent forms, study protocols, or participant manuals.
Document Type: Study Protocol and Statistical Analysis Plan
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
National Institute Of Health
Identifier Type: OTHER_GRANT
Identifier Source: secondary_id
J2006
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.