Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
WITHDRAWN
OBSERVATIONAL
2022-01-31
2023-01-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
PRECISION GRX Registry
NCT03278301
CorPath GRX STEMI Study
NCT04459299
NAVIGATE GRX Study
NCT04883008
Evaluation of the Safety and Effectiveness of the CorPath 200 System in Percutaneous Coronary Interventions (PCI)
NCT01275092
PRECISION GRX Post-Market Study - Japan
NCT03870087
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
COHORT
PROSPECTIVE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Subjects with a clinical indication for PVI
Subjects with a clinical indication for Peripheral Vascular Intervention (PVI).
Procedure/Surgery: Robotic-PVI
Robotic-assisted (CorPath GRX System) percutaneous vascular interventions.
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Procedure/Surgery: Robotic-PVI
Robotic-assisted (CorPath GRX System) percutaneous vascular interventions.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
2. Subject has a clinical indication for Peripheral Vascular Intervention (PVI).
3. Subject is deemed appropriate for robotic-assisted PVI.
4. The subject has been informed of the nature of the study, agrees to its provisions and has provided written informed consent.
5. Individual monitoring of radiation dose, using the pocket dosimeter, was initiated at start of procedure.
Exclusion Criteria
2. The investigator determines the subject or the peripheral anatomy is not suitable for ro-botic-assisted PVI.
3. Women who are pregnant.
18 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Corindus Inc.
INDUSTRY
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Jon George, MD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Einstein Medical Center
John Phillips, MD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Riverside Methodist Hospital
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
van Dijk LJ, van Noord D, de Vries AC, Kolkman JJ, Geelkerken RH, Verhagen HJ, Moelker A, Bruno MJ. Clinical management of chronic mesenteric ischemia. United European Gastroenterol J. 2019 Mar;7(2):179-188. doi: 10.1177/2050640618817698. Epub 2018 Dec 4.
Uccioli L, Meloni M, Izzo V, Giurato L, Merolla S, Gandini R. Critical limb ischemia: current challenges and future prospects. Vasc Health Risk Manag. 2018 Apr 26;14:63-74. doi: 10.2147/VHRM.S125065. eCollection 2018.
Dalal PK, Prasad A. Contemporary Outcomes of Endovascular Intervention for Critical Limb Ischemia. Interv Cardiol Clin. 2017 Apr;6(2):251-259. doi: 10.1016/j.iccl.2016.12.008. Epub 2017 Jan 27.
Canfield J, Totary-Jain H. 40 Years of Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: History and Future Directions. J Pers Med. 2018 Oct 1;8(4):33. doi: 10.3390/jpm8040033.
Pirau L, Lui F. Vertebrobasilar Insufficiency. 2023 Jul 17. In: StatPearls [Internet]. Treasure Island (FL): StatPearls Publishing; 2025 Jan-. Available from http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK482259/
Schoepe R, McQuillan S, Valsan D, Teehan G. Atherosclerotic Renal Artery Stenosis. Adv Exp Med Biol. 2017;956:209-213. doi: 10.1007/5584_2016_89.
Writing Committee Members; Gerhard-Herman MD, Gornik HL, Barrett C, Barshes NR, Corriere MA, Drachman DE, Fleisher LA, Fowkes FGR, Hamburg NM, Kinlay S, Lookstein R, Misra S, Mureebe L, Olin JW, Patel RAG, Regensteiner JG, Schanzer A, Shishehbor MH, Stewart KJ, Treat-Jacobson D, Walsh ME; ACC/AHA Task Force Members; Halperin JL, Levine GN, Al-Khatib SM, Birtcher KK, Bozkurt B, Brindis RG, Cigarroa JE, Curtis LH, Fleisher LA, Gentile F, Gidding S, Hlatky MA, Ikonomidis J, Joglar J, Pressler SJ, Wijeysundera DN. 2016 AHA/ACC Guideline on the Management of Patients with Lower Extremity Peripheral Artery Disease: Executive Summary. Vasc Med. 2017 Jun;22(3):NP1-NP43. doi: 10.1177/1358863X17701592. No abstract available.
White RD, Weir-McCall JR, Sullivan CM, Mustafa SA, Yeap PM, Budak MJ, Sudarshan TA, Zealley IA. The celiac axis revisited: anatomic variants, pathologic features, and implications for modern endovascular management. Radiographics. 2015 May-Jun;35(3):879-98. doi: 10.1148/rg.2015140243. Epub 2015 Apr 17.
Beckman JA, Creager MA. Chapter 18 Peripheral Artery Disease Clinical Evaluation. In: Creager MA, Beckman JA, Loscalzo J, eds. Vascular Medicine: A Companion to Braunwald's Heart Disease. Philadelphia, PA: Elsevier Saunders; 2013
Fowkes FG, Rudan D, Rudan I, Aboyans V, Denenberg JO, McDermott MM, Norman PE, Sampson UK, Williams LJ, Mensah GA, Criqui MH. Comparison of global estimates of prevalence and risk factors for peripheral artery disease in 2000 and 2010: a systematic review and analysis. Lancet. 2013 Oct 19;382(9901):1329-40. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(13)61249-0. Epub 2013 Aug 1.
Allison MA, Ho E, Denenberg JO, Langer RD, Newman AB, Fabsitz RR, Criqui MH. Ethnic-specific prevalence of peripheral arterial disease in the United States. Am J Prev Med. 2007 Apr;32(4):328-33. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2006.12.010.
Klein LW, Miller DL, Balter S, Laskey W, Haines D, Norbash A, Mauro MA, Goldstein JA; Joint Inter-Society Task Force on Occupational Hazards in the Interventional Laboratory. Occupational health hazards in the interventional laboratory: time for a safer environment. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2009 Feb 15;73(3):432-8. doi: 10.1002/ccd.21801.
Kim KP, Miller DL, Balter S, Kleinerman RA, Linet MS, Kwon D, Simon SL. Occupational radiation doses to operators performing cardiac catheterization procedures. Health Phys. 2008 Mar;94(3):211-27. doi: 10.1097/01.HP.0000290614.76386.35.
Vano E, Gonzalez L, Beneytez F, Moreno F. Lens injuries induced by occupational exposure in non-optimized interventional radiology laboratories. Br J Radiol. 1998 Jul;71(847):728-33. doi: 10.1259/bjr.71.847.9771383.
Goldsweig AM, Abbott JD, Aronow HD. Physician and Patient Radiation Exposure During Endovascular Procedures. Curr Treat Options Cardiovasc Med. 2017 Feb;19(2):10. doi: 10.1007/s11936-017-0507-9.
El-Sayed T, Patel AS, Cho JS, Kelly JA, Ludwinski FE, Saha P, Lyons OT, Smith A, Modarai B; Guy's and St Thomas' Cardiovascular Research Collaborative. Radiation-Induced DNA Damage in Operators Performing Endovascular Aortic Repair. Circulation. 2017 Dec 19;136(25):2406-2416. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.117.029550. Epub 2017 Oct 20.
Goldsweig AM, Kennedy KF, Kolte D, Abbott JD, Gordon PC, Sharaf BL, Sellke FW, Ehsan A, Sodha NR, Rutar F, Aronow HD. Predictors of patient radiation exposure during transcatheter aortic valve replacement. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2018 Oct 1;92(4):768-774. doi: 10.1002/ccd.27452. Epub 2017 Dec 27.
Mahmud E, Schmid F, Kalmar P, Deutschmann H, Hafner F, Rief P, Brodmann M. Feasibility and Safety of Robotic Peripheral Vascular Interventions: Results of the RAPID Trial. JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2016 Oct 10;9(19):2058-2064. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2016.07.002. Epub 2016 Sep 14.
Vano E, Gonzalez L, Fernandez JM, Haskal ZJ. Eye lens exposure to radiation in interventional suites: caution is warranted. Radiology. 2008 Sep;248(3):945-53. doi: 10.1148/radiol.2482071800. Epub 2008 Jul 15.
Weisz G, Metzger DC, Caputo RP, Delgado JA, Marshall JJ, Vetrovec GW, Reisman M, Waksman R, Granada JF, Novack V, Moses JW, Carrozza JP. Safety and feasibility of robotic percutaneous coronary intervention: PRECISE (Percutaneous Robotically-Enhanced Coronary Intervention) Study. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2013 Apr 16;61(15):1596-600. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2012.12.045.
Smitson CC, Ang L, Pourdjabbar A, Reeves R, Patel M, Mahmud E. Safety and Feasibility of a Novel, Second-Generation Robotic-Assisted System for Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: First-in-Human Report. J Invasive Cardiol. 2018 Apr;30(4):152-156. Epub 2018 Jan 15.
Smilowitz NR, Moses JW, Sosa FA, Lerman B, Qureshi Y, Dalton KE, Privitera LT, Canone-Weber D, Singh V, Leon MB, Weisz G. Robotic-Enhanced PCI Compared to the Traditional Manual Approach. J Invasive Cardiol. 2014 Jul;26(7):318-21.
Mahmud E, Dominguez A, Bahadorani J. First-in-human robotic percutaneous coronary intervention for unprotected left main stenosis. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2016 Oct;88(4):565-570. doi: 10.1002/ccd.26550. Epub 2016 May 18.
Provided Documents
Download supplemental materials such as informed consent forms, study protocols, or participant manuals.
Document Type: Study Protocol
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
104-09200
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.