Educational Intervention for Management of Constipation

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Total Enrollment

58 participants

Study Classification

OBSERVATIONAL

Study Start Date

2018-10-01

Study Completion Date

2020-03-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The overall aim of the study is to develop and test the feasibility and acceptability of a novel educational intervention for HCPs to help them manage constipation experienced by people in the hospice setting. This stage aims to establish the feasibility of, and to pilot, a novel educational intervention for HCPs. Additionally, it also originally aimed to test the feasibility of the chosen measures of change in patient care, however this was not undertaken. In order to achieve this aim, the objectives are to:

* Implement the educational intervention across Marie Curie sites.
* Evaluate the likely effectiveness of the educational intervention on the knowledge and self-efficacy of HCPs.
* Explore the feasibility and acceptability of the educational intervention with HCPs, and identify factors associated with feasibility/acceptability
* Explore the feasibility and acceptability of research procedures, and identify factors associated with feasibility/acceptability
* Examine the effect of contextual factors upon the implementation and sustainability of the educational intervention in the hospice.
* Examine the suitability of outcome measures for HCPs

Related Clinical Trials

Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.

Quality of Life in Children and Adolescents With Chronic Functional Constipation: Educational Action Effects

NCT01901445

Chronic Functional Constipation

UNKNOWN NA

Efficacy of Educational Intervention as Supporting Element in the Treatment of Functional Constipation in Children

NCT05191810

Constipation - Functional

UNKNOWN NA

Evaluation of a Preoperative Education Class for Colorectal Surgery Patients

NCT03237897

Colorectal Surgery

WITHDRAWN

The Effect of Constipation Insoles on the Management of Constipation

NCT07339293

Palliative Care Constipation

COMPLETED NA

Effectiveness of Health Education as a Nursing Intervention in Improving Quality of Life and Reducing Symptoms of Anxiety and Depression in Ostomy Patients Following Digestive Surgery: A Quasi-Experimental Study.

NCT07347158

Colon Cancer Inflamatory Bowel Disease (Crohn's and Ulcerative Colitis) Colitis Ulcerative

ENROLLING_BY_INVITATION NA

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

An incremental, multi-method approach was adopted, in line with the MRC Framework for complex interventions. Four prior data collection phases helped to inform the development of the educational intervention (a review of guidelines and a systematic review of the existing literature Muldrew et al 2018; a clinical case note review (McIlfatrick et al 2019) and qualitative findings from patients, caregivers and health professionals (Hasson et al 2019). The refinement of the intervention involved the project's fourth step (unpublished). This was the use of the Nominal Group Technique (NGT) with 39 HCPs to help identify priorities in the assessment and management of constipation. The findings from the NGT were further ratified by an international review group (n=19) on constipation management and care.

A mixed methods approach was undertaken to inform the development of the intervention and assess its impact. A small cohort, one-sample repeated measures design was used to assess the impact of the intervention on the knowledge of participants (health care professionals). Data collection was focused on three primary groups of HCPs; nurses, medics, and pharmacists. Qualitative data were collected after the intervention to assess the appropriateness of the intervention, the support in the specialist palliative care unit to complete it, the overall processes surrounding its implementation, and any impact that participants felt it had on practice. These data were gathered from focus groups (n=4) with 14 HCPs and nine telephone interviews with managers and senior staff in the SPC units. The intervention was delivered, and participants were recruited from five specialist palliative care inpatient units in the UK (Northern Ireland, Scotland, and England).

HCPS (nurses, medics, pharmacists) were invited to participate if they met the following inclusion criteria; (i) working in a clinical capacity in the SPC inpatient unit; (ii) involvement in the management of patients with constipation; (iii) over 18 years of age; and (iv) able to provide written consent in English. The educational intervention was advertised across sites through Research Leads, flyers and the identification of a "champion", in conjunction with senior staff. HCPs who met the inclusion criteria and were willing to participate could sign up via a webpage containing an information sheet, consent form, and information on how to access the education programme.

Intervention development and implementation processes Based on the findings from the previous stages, a 6-week, online, educational program was created with Syngery Learning an online learning management company, on constipation assessment and management. Each week of the program consisted of a short theoretical introduction to key aspects of constipation (assessment, prevention, non-pharmacological management, pharmacological management, opioid induced constipation, and bowel obstruction). This was supplemented with a quiz, link to practice activity, and a group discussion in an online closed group. Participant's study was largely self-directed and flexible. They could log in at any time during the 6-week data collection period to complete the activities. Managers of the specialist palliative care units were supportive of the educational program and assisted in the practical elements of running the course, including releasing staff from their workload to complete the required activities. Participants were encouraged to complete these activities during their work hours.

Data collection Measures were completed online at baseline and after completion of the educational intervention. Competency measures were the primary outcome of the study, linked to the NiCan Framework for Generalist and Specialist Palliative and End of Life Care Knowledge and Skills Framework. Participants completed a competency assessment tool extracted from the Competency and End of Life Care Competency Tool and the Knowledge and Self-Efficacy Survey. The intervention was implemented gradually, over two separate occasions, enabling learning from the first phase to be incorporated into the second phase.

Qualitative Data Collection Qualitative data were collected after the intervention to assess the appropriateness of the resource, the support within the SPC unit to complete it, the overall processes surrounding its implementation, and any impact that participants felt it had on practice. This used focus groups and telephone interviews with managers and senior staff within the specialist palliative care units . Participants taking part in were invited to participate if they met set inclusion criteria; (i) employed by hospice as HCP; (ii) previous experience working with patients receiving palliative care who suffer from constipation; (iii) over 18 years of age; and (iv) Willing to participant in the study and have provided informed consent.

Cost analysis Information was collected on the time spent by staff on the training resource, by staff type and by study centre. Staff time was valued using unit costs obtained from the Personal Social Services Research Unit Costs of Health \& Social Care 2018.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Constipation

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Observational Model Type

OTHER

Study Time Perspective

RETROSPECTIVE

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

DEMCoN Educational Intervention

Educational programme on constipation for Health care professionals in this clinical specialist palliative care

Intervention Type BEHAVIORAL

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Working in a clinical capacity in the SPC inpatient unit
* Involvement in the management of patients with constipation.
* Over 18 years of age;
* Able to provide written consent in English.