CT-DSA Evaluation of Embolization in Debulking Spinal Surgery
NCT ID: NCT04497051
Last Updated: 2024-05-24
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
48 participants
OBSERVATIONAL
2020-08-18
2023-03-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Key word: spine/embolization/computed tomography
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Prospective Study on the Use of Middle Meningeal Artery Embolization for Chronic Subdural Haematoma
NCT04500795
Intraoperative Laser Speckle Contrast Imaging to Assess Blood Flow During Neurosurgery
NCT05028400
Embolic Signals Detection Study (Esds) in Candidates for Surgical Carotid Revascularisation
NCT05134493
Study on the Effectiveness and Safety of Coil System for Intracranial Aneurysm Embolization
NCT04497181
Prophylactic vs Therapeutic Cerebrospinal Fluid Drain Placement During Endovascular Thoracoabdominal Aortic Aneurysm Repair
NCT04941157
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Despite relative good outcome of aggressive spinal surgery, it is a relative massive procedure in which life-threatening blood loss commonly occur. To achieve better surgical outcome and decrease complication, preoperative embolization is suggested to control blood loss . The procedure is performed by an interventional radiologist to deliver embolic agent into vascular pedicles of target vertebra, in hope to achieve optimal devascularization of the tumour. The concept is simple and the similar procedure has been performed thousands of times in the world. However, its efficacy and utilization are not yet proven by clinical trials. When and how to perform this procedure largely depends on experience of operating interventional radiologist.
CT is an important imaging tool for spinal disease. Because of its rapid acquisition, adequate resolution, and easy reformatting, it is optimal for intolerable patients. Nevertheless, osseous structure is extremely radiopaque, evaluation of tumoral enhancement in vertebrae is not easy. Nevertheless, the enhancement of osseous tumour can be evaluated with advanced subtraction reformatting technique. The technique is similar to digital subtraction angiography (DSA) of catheter angiography, and we call it CT-DSA image. As compared with traditional catheter-based DSA, CT-DSA has following additional advantages: 1) non-invasiveness; 2) non-selective enhancement of the target; 3) allowing multiplanar reformatting and additional post-processing and quantification. The tool is very versatile to investigate the vascularity of the vertebral neoplasm. In our earlier result, we found the CT-DSA has good correlation with DSA in vascularity assessment, suggestive of its utilization in pre-operative and pre-embolization evaluation of spinal tumour. It can be used in semi-quntitative and quantitative fashion.
Traditionally, the efficacy of embolization is determined by surgical outcome, usually with gold standard of blood loss. However, blood loss is determined by many different factors, including tumor volume, surgical technique, and other anatomical factors. Using CT-DSA, evaluation of the embolization effect directly is possible. As the study can be repeated after embolization, the interval change can be observed with objective measurement.
In summary, using CT-DSA, it is possible to evaluate the vascularity of the osseous tumour and efficacy of devascularization after embolization before surgery. We can therefore design study to test efficacy of different intervention strategy, and find out the more beneficial indication, which can incorporate into clinical workflow and help patients.
Purpose
1. The establish subjective risk classification of debulking surgery in term of tumour vascularity
2. To subjectively evaluate efficacy of preoperative embolization
3. To design appropriate clinical workflow in management of patient with vertebral malignancy
Importance Vertebrae is 3rd most common site of metastatic malignancy, and is usually warrant aggressive spinal surgery. Since preoperative embolization is commonly done in this patient, it needs subjective tool to assess its efficacy and clear indication. By using CT-DSA, there is potential to provide tailored strategy of patient management before surgery.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
COHORT
PROSPECTIVE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Embolized patients
subjects receiving preoperative embolization for aggressive spinal debulking surgery
CT-DSA
CTA before and after embolization
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
CT-DSA
CTA before and after embolization
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
2. Eligible for aggressive spinal surgery, including debulking and en bloc spondylectomy
3. Life expectancy more than 6 months
4. Serum creatinine less than 1.5 mg/dL
Exclusion Criteria
2. Woman in pregnancy or breast feeding
3. Serious allergic reaction to contrast medium
4. Instable neurological condition warrant urgent operation
20 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
National Taiwan University Hospital
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Yen-Heng Lin, MD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
National Taiwan University Hospital
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
National Taiwan University Hospital
Taipei, , Taiwan
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
202001028RINB
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.