Transfusion of Whole Blood to Military Forces in a Combat Situation
NCT ID: NCT04496700
Last Updated: 2020-08-03
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
NA
25 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2010-09-30
2011-06-30
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Among Norwegian troops this gives one of two choices:
1. A soldier donates blood to a wounded fellow soldier
2. Personnel in safe distance donates blood and it is transported to the frontline.
Alternative b might implicate frequent donations and unused blood must be auto-re-transfused.
This study will investigate:
1. Can 'buddy transfusion' in the field be justified also in medical aspects?
2. Can repeated donations and auto-transfusions of transported whole blood into personnel(X) be justified also in medical aspects?
(X) Blood typed and screened for HIV, HBV, HCV, Syphilis before assignment
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Sternal Intraosseous Transfusion of Autologous Whole Blood: A Comparison of Flow Rates and Degree of Hemolysis
NCT02924792
Evaluation of a Transfusion Therapy Using Whole Blood in the Management of Coagulopathy in Patients With Acute Traumatic Hemorrhage
NCT04431999
Use of Blood and Plasma in Norwegian Physician-staffed Helicopter Emergency Medical System
NCT02784951
Cold Stored Whole Blood in Cardiothoracic Surgery
NCT04988620
Early Whole Blood in Patients Requiring Transfusion After Major Trauma
NCT01227005
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
The study was approved by the research ethics committee of the Regional West Health Trust, Norway. Twenty-five nonsmoking male soldiers, median age 29 years, from a Navy special forces unit consented to participate. Mean body mass index was 24.7 kg/m2 (range, 22.6-28.3 kg/m2).
This is a pilot study and we were not able to find data in the literature providing information for power calculations regarding the testing we included in the study. The participants were divided in three different groups for testing. The grouping was based on availability at the given time points, and there was no selection to any specific group: Group 1-Bruce protocol treadmill stress test, push-ups, and pull-ups (n = 7); Group 2-50-round pistol shooting test (n = 12); and Group 3-uphill hiking exercise carrying a 20-kg backpack (n = 6). Each group was tested twice, before and immediately after donation of 450 mL of blood.
The soldiers were allowed to rehydrate during the donation procedure and theywere all offered a 0.5-L water bottle. The exact volume each participant consumed was not recorded. All 25 soldiers participated in a 60-minute training program aimed at testing whether it is possible to teach nonmedic soldiers buddy transfusion during a short period.
Multistage treadmill stress test, push-ups, and pull-ups
VO2 max was estimated in seven soldiers. Bruce protocol was followed, using a multistaged treadmill test. Each stage lasted for 3 minutes, and in total seven stages were included in the procedure. For each stage, belt velocity and slope were increased (see Table 1). The soldiers ran until exhaustion (unable to continue running). Heart rate and lactate were measured at the end of each stage and at exhaustion when total time on belt (T) was noted. Lactate was measured in a blood sample from the ear lobule and a portable lactate analyzer (Lactate Scout, EKF Diagnostics, Barleben, Germany) was used. From the total run time used, VO2 max was estimated as follows:14 VO2 max = 14.8-(1.379 ¥ T) + (0.451 ¥ T2) - (0.012 ¥ T3). The pushups were performed as "full push-up" in the prone position, with the back and legs straight and off the floor. The hands were placed below each shoulder, with arms fully extended. From this start position, the body was lowered by using the arms until the chest touched the floor, and then back to the start position. Standard pull-ups were performed as a dead-hang pull-up, with an overhand grip. Then the body was pulled up until the chin cleared the bar, and finished by lowering the body until arms and shoulders were fully extended A baseline test (predonation test) was performed 4 days prior to donation, and the postdonation test immediately after donating blood. The soldiers performed the procedures until they were unable to continue. The test endpoint was differences in estimated VO2 max, maximum heart rate (HRmax), lactate, and number of push-ups and pull-ups.
Fifty-round pistol shooting test
Twelve soldiers performed a standard Navy special operational forces protocol rapid shooting test, using their personalweapon (9 mm).The protocol has five separate tests, each with 10 rounds (6 mnondominant hand, 10 mdominant hand, 10 m 2 + 1, 18 m precision, 25 m precision). The predonation test was performed 2 days before donation, and the postdonation test immediately after donating blood. The weather and light conditions were similar on the test days. The study outcome in this exercise was differences in total hits.
Uphill hiking exercise
Six soldiers were tested on an uphill exercise carrying a 20-kg backpack. The track had a 28% slope and 450-m altitude difference; the soldiers were instructed to walk as a group, and no individual time measurements could therefore be recorded. The soldiers walked up and down again as quickly as they were able to (no running) before they donated 1 unit of blood. They thenwere offered water (ad libitum) to rehydrate without any further break before they repeated the exercise, again walking as quickly as the group managed. The endpoint was the difference in time used by the team on the uphill part of the track. The soldiers also filled in a questionnaire to report possible side effects related to the donation and the postdonation performance.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
NON_RANDOMIZED
SINGLE_GROUP
OTHER
NONE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Group 1 - Shooting test
All participants in this group were tested for shooting abilities before and after blood donation. No variation within the group.
Whole blood donation and transfusion
The effect of whole blood donation on physical performance:
Donation of 450 ml whole blood - one time only.
Group 2 - VO2max
All participants in this group were tested for physical abilities before and after blood donation. Method: Bruce protocol.
No variation of protocol within the group.
Whole blood donation and transfusion
The effect of whole blood donation on physical performance:
Donation of 450 ml whole blood - one time only.
Group 3 - Feasability
All participants in this group were tested for feasability before and after blood donation. Method: Hiking uphill with 20 kg backpack.
No variation of method within the group.
Whole blood donation and transfusion
The effect of whole blood donation on physical performance:
Donation of 450 ml whole blood - one time only.
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Whole blood donation and transfusion
The effect of whole blood donation on physical performance:
Donation of 450 ml whole blood - one time only.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
Exclusion Criteria
18 Years
40 Years
ALL
Yes
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Haukeland University Hospital
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Geir Strandenes, OF3
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Haukeland UH
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Haukeland University Hospital
Bergen, , Norway
Norwegian Naval Base Haakonsvern
Bergen, , Norway
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
2010/1559
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.