Active Somatosensory Exercise for Chronic Stroke

NCT ID: NCT04490655

Last Updated: 2023-10-18

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

9 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2021-03-01

Study Completion Date

2023-05-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The current work aims to examine whether the proposed rehabilitation training or exercise will eventually yield improvements in both motor and somatosensory aspects at one goal. Here, the word 'somatosensory' refers to bodily sensations associated with proprioception or kinesthesia, not the sensation of touch, pain, and temperature. The study focuses on upper limb retraining for community-dwelling stroke survivors using a robotic device. At the end of training, both movement accuracy and somatosensory acuity in chronic stroke survivors are presumed to improve, and such paradigm is expected to provide reliable benefits as compared to conventional intervention alone.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Long-term disability is common sequela among people with stroke. On top of motor impairment, many stroke survivors suffer from somatosensory impairment of their paretic arm, leading to their inability to perform activities of daily living using upper limb. In this respect, recent research on motor recovery following stroke has begun to place more emphasis on the inclusion of somatosensory retraining in stroke rehabilitation program. Although evidence is still scarce, training paradigms that simultaneously combine both somatosensory and motor aspects are considered useful for motor recovery in stroke survivors. Principally, studies focusing on such form of training paradigm sought to employ robotic technologies to assist in the retraining of both motor and somatosensory function in stroke survivors. Robotic technologies have gained popularity recently for assessing somatosensory function in clinical setting due to its objective quantification of patients' performance and high inter-rater reliability. Thus, with the purpose of improving both motor and somatosensory functions in chronic stroke survivors, this proposed study will provide an intensive robotic-based behavioral training intervention to chronic stroke survivors from the community. The intervention will require active participation of the patients through an exploratory strategy.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Stroke

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

SINGLE

Outcome Assessors

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Active somatosensory training group

Chronic stroke patients will be randomized to receive 15 sessions of robotic-based training intervention that focuses on the retraining of both motor and somatosensory functions, for a maximum of one hour per session.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Active somatosensory training

Intervention Type BEHAVIORAL

Patients in the experimental group will be required to move the robotic handle using their paretic arm from the start position to a visual target shown on screen. However, patients' paretic arm will be occluded from vision throughout the training session. They will make the reaching movement by depending on their proprioception of the arm position in space, without relying too much on the vision of their arm. Haptic guidance will be provided as somatosensory cues while participants are actively moving. Positive reinforcement will also be given for each successful movement that reaches the target in the form of a pleasant audio tone, visual feedback, and a running score. Assessment will be performed before and after the completion of the whole 15 training sessions.

Motor-based training group

Chronic stroke patients will be randomized to receive 15 sessions of robotic-based training intervention that is purely motor based, for a maximum of one hour per session.

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Motor-based training

Intervention Type BEHAVIORAL

Patients in the control group will also be required to propel the robotic handle using their paretic arm to a target location. This training covers the same centre-out reaching movements but without any emphasis on proprioception, where the view of the paretic arm will not be occluded. However, no haptic guidance will be provided during the reaching movement. Positive reinforcement will still be given to inform the participants of their trial outcomes. Assessment will be performed before and after the completion of the whole 15 training sessions.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Active somatosensory training

Patients in the experimental group will be required to move the robotic handle using their paretic arm from the start position to a visual target shown on screen. However, patients' paretic arm will be occluded from vision throughout the training session. They will make the reaching movement by depending on their proprioception of the arm position in space, without relying too much on the vision of their arm. Haptic guidance will be provided as somatosensory cues while participants are actively moving. Positive reinforcement will also be given for each successful movement that reaches the target in the form of a pleasant audio tone, visual feedback, and a running score. Assessment will be performed before and after the completion of the whole 15 training sessions.

Intervention Type BEHAVIORAL

Motor-based training

Patients in the control group will also be required to propel the robotic handle using their paretic arm to a target location. This training covers the same centre-out reaching movements but without any emphasis on proprioception, where the view of the paretic arm will not be occluded. However, no haptic guidance will be provided during the reaching movement. Positive reinforcement will still be given to inform the participants of their trial outcomes. Assessment will be performed before and after the completion of the whole 15 training sessions.

Intervention Type BEHAVIORAL

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* First-time ischemic or haemorrhagic stroke survivors;
* Patients of at least 6-month post-stroke;
* Patients with severe to moderate sensory impairment as assessed by Erasmus Nottingham Sensory Assessment (≤ 6/8);
* Patients with arm motor impairment, shoulder abduction and elbow extension Medical Research Council (MRC) motor power grade 3-5;

Exclusion Criteria

* Patients with bilateral impairment;
* Patients with high upper-limb spasticity (Ashworth scale \> 2);
* Patients with unilateral neglect as assessed by Star Cancellation Test (score \< 44);
* Patients with cognitive impairment as assessed by a 2-step instructions from the modified Mini Mental State Examination;
* Patients with a known history of mental disorders;
* Patients with the inability to perform upper arm activity due to excessive pain
Minimum Eligible Age

21 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

75 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Nanyang Technological University

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Ananda Sidarta

Research Fellow

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Ananda Sidarta, PhD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Research Fellow

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

St Luke's Hospital

Bukit Batok New Town, , Singapore

Site Status

AWWA Day Rehab Centre

Singapore, , Singapore

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Singapore

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Bernardi NF, Darainy M, Ostry DJ. Somatosensory Contribution to the Initial Stages of Human Motor Learning. J Neurosci. 2015 Oct 21;35(42):14316-26. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1344-15.2015.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 26490869 (View on PubMed)

Sidarta A, Vahdat S, Bernardi NF, Ostry DJ. Somatic and Reinforcement-Based Plasticity in the Initial Stages of Human Motor Learning. J Neurosci. 2016 Nov 16;36(46):11682-11692. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1767-16.2016.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 27852776 (View on PubMed)

Goble DJ. Proprioceptive acuity assessment via joint position matching: from basic science to general practice. Phys Ther. 2010 Aug;90(8):1176-84. doi: 10.2522/ptj.20090399. Epub 2010 Jun 3.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 20522675 (View on PubMed)

Sidarta A, Lim YC, Kuah CWK, Loh YJ, Ang WT. Robotic-based ACTive somatoSENSory (Act.Sens) retraining on upper limb functions with chronic stroke survivors: study protocol for a pilot randomised controlled trial. Pilot Feasibility Stud. 2021 Nov 15;7(1):207. doi: 10.1186/s40814-021-00948-3.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 34782024 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

NTU-IRB-2019-10-022

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

VIBROACOUSTIC THERAPY in PATIENTS WITH STROKE
NCT07206485 NOT_YET_RECRUITING NA
Kinesio Taping in Stroke Patient
NCT06188845 COMPLETED NA