The Analysis of Posterior Soft Tissue Repair Durability

NCT ID: NCT04490304

Last Updated: 2020-07-29

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

42 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2018-09-04

Study Completion Date

2020-01-24

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Dislocation after THA usually occurs early after surgery and some go on to disabling recurrent dislocations . The posterior surgical approach is frequently used since it provides excellent exposure of both acetabulum and femur. However, many series on primary THA have reported that dislocation is 2 to 3 times more frequent after the posterior approach as compared to other approaches . Dissatisfaction with these dislocation rates resulted in the introduction of different posterior soft tissue repair techniques. Many authors have reported statistically significant differences in dislocation rates with posterior soft tissue repair as compared to without . However, there is still a concern in the literature regarding the durability of posterior soft tissue repair.

The aim of our study was to analyse THA patients with posterior soft tissue repair in terms of suture durability of two different suture materials and time of suture failure.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

A total of 42 consecutive THA patients (20 women,22 men) operated for primary osteoarthritis (OA) between 2018 and 2019 were included in the study. All patients were operated by the same orthopaedic surgeon under spinal anaesthesia via posterior approach using the same type of uncemented Polar stem(Smith and Nephew Inc) with 36 mm head in combination with uncemented Ep-Fit acetabular cup (Smith and Nephew Inc). All the patients were randomly divided into two groups. The randomization process was done by the odd and even number technique in which the patients with even inpatient numbers were assigned in Group A while the odd inpatient number patients were allotted in Group B. Patients in whom number 5 Ethibond Excel(Ethicon, Somerville, NJ) were used for soft tissue repair were included in Group A (n=22), whereas patients treated with number 2 Vicryl (Ethicon, Somerville,NJ)were in Group B (n=20).

The short external rotators tendons were released from the greater trochanter just at their insertion point. The capsule was incised, but not excised. The posterior repair included reattaching the piriformis,conjoined tendons and the capsule to the greater trochanter at the insertion point through 2, 2 mm drill holes with 2 stitches with non-absorbable no.5 Ethibond suture in one group and with absorbable no 2 vicryl suture in the other group after the prosthesis had been implanted and the joint reduced. One hemoclip was attached to the piriformis tendon and another to the conjoined tendons before pulling the sutures out of the drill holes in the trochanter. The suture materials lateral to the drill holes at the trochanter were also attached with two hemoclips.(fig 1-2) The postoperative regimen included walking with full weight bearing the next day after the surgery with a walking frame and without limitations in internal rotation or flexion. Anteroposterior radiographic examination was undertaken immediately after the patients returned from the operating theatre to the intensive care unit,at the 15th day, at 3 months and 6 months postoperatively (figure 3). The detachment of the hemoclips were measured during the follow up period.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Arthroplasty Complications

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

NA

Intervention Model

SINGLE_GROUP

prospective randomised trial
Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

NONE

the x-ray measurements after the surgery were done by a care provider, not by the investigator

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

posterior soft tissue repair durability

Group Type OTHER

durability of posterior soft tissue repair

Intervention Type OTHER

how durable is the posterior soft tissue repair after total hip arthroplasty in primary osteoarthiritis patients?

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

durability of posterior soft tissue repair

how durable is the posterior soft tissue repair after total hip arthroplasty in primary osteoarthiritis patients?

Intervention Type OTHER

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

primary osteoarthritis patients between 40-80 years old undergoing total hip replacement surgery between 2018-2019

Exclusion Criteria

Any type of secondary osteoarthritis patients, and patients younger than 40 and older than 80 years old.
Minimum Eligible Age

41 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

79 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Bakirkoy Dr. Sadi Konuk Research and Training Hospital

OTHER_GOV

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

erdem edipoglu

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Bakirkoy Dr. Sadi Konuk Research and Training Hospital

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Bakırkoysadikonuk

Istanbul, Bakırkoy, Turkey (Türkiye)

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Turkey (Türkiye)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

2018/252

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.