Axial Ablation Versus Terminal Interruption of the Reflux Source

NCT ID: NCT04484168

Last Updated: 2022-05-18

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

UNKNOWN

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

308 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2020-07-21

Study Completion Date

2022-10-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

This randomised trial aims to compare the effect on ulcer healing of different means of managing venous reflux in the lower limb. It is a non-inferiority trial comparing endovenous ablation of the axial (Saphenous and other large veins) veins of the lowere limb, versus terminal interruption of the reflux source (TIRS). For the purposes of this trial TIRS will be achieved using foam sclerotherapy of the distal tributaries in the immediate vicinity of the ulcer being treated.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Venous Ulcer

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

DOUBLE

Investigators Outcome Assessors

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Terminal Interruption of the Reflux Source (TIRS

These patients will have foam sclerotherapy of the veins in the immediate vicinity of their venous ulcer and thereafter be managed in compression bandaging and followed up fro 6 months or until the ulcer has healed

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Terminal Interruption of the Reflux Source

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Foam Sclerotherapy of veins in the immediate vicinity of the venous ulcer

Axial Ablation

These patients will undergo endovenous ablation of the great or small saphenous veins, or other large superficial veins exhibiting significant reflux

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Axial Ablation

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Endovenous ablation of venous reflux in the main superficial veins of the leg

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Terminal Interruption of the Reflux Source

Foam Sclerotherapy of veins in the immediate vicinity of the venous ulcer

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Axial Ablation

Endovenous ablation of venous reflux in the main superficial veins of the leg

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

Primary or recurrent venous leg ulcer

Long or short saphenous vein reflux confirmed on ultrasound assessment, defined as retrograde flow lasting for \>0.5 seconds

Ankle-Brachial pressure Index (ABI) ≥ 0.8 (if ulceration prevents ABI Toe-Brachial Index(TBI) ≥ 0.5 acceptable), or a palpable pulse

Ulcer size between 1 and 200 cm2

Patient suitable for full compression bandaging

Exclusion Criteria

Active infection of ulcer, or infection within the last two weeks

Leg ulcer of non-venous aetiology as determined by clinical assessment

Isolated perforator vein reflux only

Evidence of deep venous insufficiency or thrombosis

Known hypersensitivity to Sotradecol or similar sclerosants

Previous inability to tolerate compression bandages

Presence of any contraindications for the use of compression bandages:

Absence of a palpable pulse, and Ankle Brachial Index (ABI) \<0.8

Decompensated congestive cardiac failure (NYHA Class IV)

Known hypersensitivity to any of the component materials

Patients unable to provide informed consent

Patients attending the leg ulcer clinic already will be excluded from enrolment with the same ulcer but will be eligible to enrol with a contralateral ulcer. Recurrent ipsilateral ulcers will not be excluded.
Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Stewart R Walsh

UNKNOWN

Sponsor Role collaborator

Wael Tawfick

UNKNOWN

Sponsor Role collaborator

Thomas A Aherne

UNKNOWN

Sponsor Role collaborator

Mark Twyford

UNKNOWN

Sponsor Role collaborator

Marie O'Shaughnessy

UNKNOWN

Sponsor Role collaborator

University College Hospital Galway

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Colum Keohane

Specialist Registrar in Vascular Surgery

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Colum R Keohane, MB,BCh,BAO

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

UCH Galway and NUI Galway

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Roscommon Unversity Hospiral

Roscommon, , Ireland

Site Status RECRUITING

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Ireland

Central Contacts

Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.

Colum R Keohane, MB,BCh,BAO

Role: CONTACT

00353876492372

Stewart R Walsh, MCh,MD

Role: CONTACT

0035391893642

Facility Contacts

Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.

Colum R Keohane, MB BCh BAO

Role: primary

00353876492372

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Cr K, D W, M T, T A, W T, Sr W. Axial Ablation versus Terminal Interruption of the Reflux Source (AAVTIRS): A Randomised Controlled Trial. Vasc Endovascular Surg. 2024 Nov;58(8):805-812. doi: 10.1177/15385744241265750. Epub 2024 Jul 21.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 39034428 (View on PubMed)

Keohane CR, Westby D, Twyford M, Ahern T, Tawfick W, Walsh SR. Axial ablation versus terminal interruption of the reflux source (AAVTIRS): a randomised controlled trial. Trials. 2022 Jun 10;23(1):483. doi: 10.1186/s13063-022-06440-4.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 35689289 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

CA2416

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.