Distal Pancreatectomy, Minimally Invasive or Open, for Malignancy (DIPLOMA)

NCT ID: NCT04483726

Last Updated: 2022-08-22

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

UNKNOWN

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

9 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2020-07-09

Study Completion Date

2025-07-09

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Objective: To compare MIDP with ODP regarding radical resection rate for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) in the pancreatic body or tail.

Study design: A pan-European, randomized controlled, multicenter, patient-blinded non-inferiority trial. This protocol was designed according to the SPIRIT guidelines1. Pathologists judging the primary endpoint will be blinded for the surgical approach (MIDP vs ODP). A blinded adjudication committee will assess all endpoints.

Study population: Two groups of 129 patients (258 in total) with an indication for elective distal pancreatectomy with splenectomy because of proven or highly suspected PDAC.

Intervention: Minimally invasive distal pancreatectomy (either laparoscopic or robot-assisted)

Control: Open distal pancreatectomy

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Rationale: Several systematic reviews have suggested superior short term outcomes after minimally invasive distal pancreatectomy (MIDP) as compared to open distal pancreatectomy (ODP) for benign and pre-malignant disease. In the literature and in a recent pan-European survey, about one third of pancreatic surgeons expressed concerns regarding the oncologic safety (i.e. radical resection, lymph node retrieval and survival) of MIDP in pancreatic cancer. Most surgeons stated that a randomized trial assessing oncologic safety in MIDP vs ODP for pancreatic cancer is needed.

Objective: To compare MIDP with ODP regarding radical resection rate for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) in the pancreatic body or tail.

Study design: A pan-European, randomized controlled, multicenter, patient-blinded non-inferiority trial. This protocol was designed according to the SPIRIT guidelines1. Pathologists judging the primary endpoint will be blinded for the surgical approach (MIDP vs ODP). A blinded adjudication committee will assess all endpoints.

Study population: Two groups of 129 patients (258 in total) with an indication for elective distal pancreatectomy with splenectomy because of proven or highly suspected PDAC.

Intervention: Minimally invasive distal pancreatectomy (either laparoscopic or robot-assisted)

Control: Open distal pancreatectomy

Main study parameters/endpoints: Primary outcome is the microscopically radical (R0, \>1mm) resection rate. Main secondary outcomes are survival, lymph node retrieval, intraoperative outcomes (such as blood loss, operative time and conversion), postoperative outcomes (such as complications, time to functional recovery and hospital stay) and quality of life

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

OTHER

Blinding Strategy

SINGLE

Participants

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

MIDP

minimally invasive distal pancreatectomy

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

minimally invasive distal pancreatectomy

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Minimally invasive distal pancreatectomy (either laparoscopic or robot-assisted)

ODP

open distal pancreatectomy

Group Type SHAM_COMPARATOR

open distal pancreatectomy

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

open distal pancreatectomy

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

minimally invasive distal pancreatectomy

Minimally invasive distal pancreatectomy (either laparoscopic or robot-assisted)

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

open distal pancreatectomy

open distal pancreatectomy

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* ≥ 18 years;
* Elective indication for distal pancreatectomy for proven or suspected PDAC;
* Upfront (without induction / down-sizing radio- and/or chemotherapy) resectable PDAC in the pancreatic body or tail;
* The tumor can be radically resected via both minimally invasive or open surgery according to the local treating team;
* The patient is fit to undergo both open and minimally invasive distal pancreatectomy

Exclusion Criteria

* score of American society of anaesthesiologists (ASA) \>3;
* A medical history of chronic pancreatitis (according to the M-ANNHEIM criteria);
* Second malignancy necessitating resection during the same procedure;
* Distant metastases (M1) including involved distant lymph nodes;
* Tumor involvement or abutment of major vessels (celiac trunk\*, mesenteric artery or portomesenteric vein);
* Pregnancy;
* Participation in another study with interference of study outcomes.
* Cystic lesion having undergone malignant transformation

* the celiac trunk should be 5mm clear from tumor
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

AIDS Malignancy Consortium

NETWORK

Sponsor Role collaborator

University Hospital, Montpellier

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Hôpital Beaujon - APHP

Clichy, , France

Site Status

CHU Saint Eloi - Montpellier

Montpellier, , France

Site Status

Centre Hospitalier Orléans

Orléans, , France

Site Status

Institut Mutualiste Montsouris

Paris, , France

Site Status

Hôpital Paul Brousse

Villejuif, , France

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

France

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

RECHMPL19_0340

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.