NEXUS Aortic Arch Clinical Study to Evaluate Safety and Effectiveness
NCT ID: NCT04471909
Last Updated: 2025-10-17
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
RECRUITING
NA
110 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2020-10-20
2029-10-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Further Evaluation of Safety and Performance of the NEXUS Aortic Arch Stent Graft System and the Custom-Made NEXUS Multibranch™ Aortic Arch Stent Graft System
NCT05636527
The Single Branch NEXUS™ Clinical Study
NCT03208504
NEXUS™ Aortic Arch Stent Graft System First In Man Study
NCT02365454
The NEXUS™ Compassionate Use Data Collection Study
NCT03420066
Branched Aortic Arch Study
NCT00488696
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
NON_RANDOMIZED
SINGLE_GROUP
TREATMENT
NONE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Chronic Dissection (arm closed to enrollment)
NEXUS Aortic Stent Graft System
Arch Stent Graft, whose cranial narrow end is intended to be deployed into the Brachiocephalic artery and whose distal end is intended to be deployed into the Descending Thoracic Aorta.
Ascending Stent Graft intended to be deployed in the Ascending Aorta.
OPTIONAL: Descending Extension can be used in case the aortic lesion elongates further distally and out of the covered length offered by the Arch Stent Graft. Multiple Descending Extensions can be used if needed to cover the entire length of the lesion.
Penetrating Aortic Ulcer and/or Intramural Hematoma
NEXUS Aortic Stent Graft System
Arch Stent Graft, whose cranial narrow end is intended to be deployed into the Brachiocephalic artery and whose distal end is intended to be deployed into the Descending Thoracic Aorta.
Ascending Stent Graft intended to be deployed in the Ascending Aorta.
OPTIONAL: Descending Extension can be used in case the aortic lesion elongates further distally and out of the covered length offered by the Arch Stent Graft. Multiple Descending Extensions can be used if needed to cover the entire length of the lesion.
Aneurysm (arm closed to enrollment)
NEXUS Aortic Stent Graft System
Arch Stent Graft, whose cranial narrow end is intended to be deployed into the Brachiocephalic artery and whose distal end is intended to be deployed into the Descending Thoracic Aorta.
Ascending Stent Graft intended to be deployed in the Ascending Aorta.
OPTIONAL: Descending Extension can be used in case the aortic lesion elongates further distally and out of the covered length offered by the Arch Stent Graft. Multiple Descending Extensions can be used if needed to cover the entire length of the lesion.
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
NEXUS Aortic Stent Graft System
Arch Stent Graft, whose cranial narrow end is intended to be deployed into the Brachiocephalic artery and whose distal end is intended to be deployed into the Descending Thoracic Aorta.
Ascending Stent Graft intended to be deployed in the Ascending Aorta.
OPTIONAL: Descending Extension can be used in case the aortic lesion elongates further distally and out of the covered length offered by the Arch Stent Graft. Multiple Descending Extensions can be used if needed to cover the entire length of the lesion.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
2. Proximal/ascending native or previously implanted surgical graft landing zone of appropriate length
3. Proximal/ascending native or previously implanted surgical graft landing zone of appropriate diameter
4. Distal/descending native landing zone of appropriate length
5. Distal/descending native landing zone of appropriate diameter
6. Brachiocephalic trunk native landing zone of appropriate length
7. Brachiocephalic trunk native landing zone of appropriate diameter
8. Appropriate take off angle between the Brachiocephalic Artery and the Aortic Arch perpendicular
9. Appropriate aortic arch perpendicular diameter
10. Chronic dissection with at least one of the following conditions:
1. An aortic aneurysm with a maximum diameter ≥ 55 mm
2. Rapidly expanding false lumen (growth of \> 0.5 cm/6 months)
3. Compressed true lumen associated with end organ malperfusion
4. Symptomatic
11. Aneurysm with at least one of the following conditions:
1. Dilatation of the aortic arch larger than 5 cm in diameter for subject with fusiform aneurysm
2. Dilatation of the aortic arch is 1.5 times the normal diameter for subjects ascending or descending
3. Dilation of the aortic arch larger than 2.5 cm for subject with saccular aneurysm
4. Symptomatic aneurysm of the aortic arch
5. Aortic diameter growth rate \> 5mm per 6 months
6. Postoperative pseudoaneurysm expanding from anastomotic suture lines
12. Penetrating aortic ulcer with at least one of the following:
1. Symptomatic
2. Ulcer demonstrates expansion
13. Intramural hematoma with at least one of the following:
1. Symptomatic (persistent pain)
2. Transverse or longitudinal expansion on serial imaging
14. In the event of a lesion in the ascending aortic, the proximal/ascending native or previously implanted surgical graft the landing zone must be appropriate
15. Femoral / iliac artery diameter as documented by CTA or MRA that allows endovascular access to the diseased site with a 20 Fr. delivery catheter.
16. Access vessels morphology suitable for endovascular repair in terms of tortuosity, calcification and angulation, documented by CTA/MRA.
17. Brachial/Axial Artery diameter that allows endovascular access suitable for 7 Fr.
18. Subject is considered an appropriate candidate for an elective surgery.
19. Subject is considered to be at high risk for open repair, as determined by the investigator.
20. Access vessels, iliac/femoral \& brachial/axillary compatible with vascular access techniques (femoral cutdown or percutaneous), devices, and /or accessories.
21. Subject is willing and able to comply with procedures specified in the protocol and is able to return for follow-up visits as specified by the protocol.
Exclusion Criteria
2. Lesions that can be safely treated with TEVAR landing in zone 2 (with or w/o LSA vascularization)
3. Required emergent treatment, e.g., trauma, rupture
4. Acute vascular injury of the aorta due to trauma
5. Aortic rupture or unstable aneurysm
6. Received a previous stent or stent graft in the treated area (including planned landing area)
7. Required surgical or endovascular treatment of an infra-renal aneurysm at time of implantation
8. Planned major surgical or interventional procedure at time of screening, to be performed after the NEXUS™ implantation.
9. Any major surgical or interventional procedure 6 weeks before the NEXUS™ implantation, exclusive of planned procedures that are needed for the safe and effective placement of the stent graft (e.g. supra-aortic bypass).
10. Subject has had a myocardial infarction (MI) or cerebral vascular accident (CVA) within 90 days prior to the planned implantation
11. Subjects with severe aortic valvular insufficiency as determined by echocardiography
12. Mechanical valve that preclude safe delivery of NEXUS™
13. Known Connective tissue disease (e.g., Marfan's or Ehler's-Danlos syndromes)
14. Subject has an active systemic infection at the time of the procedure documented by pain, fever, drainage, positive culture
15. Pregnant
16. Life expectancy of less than 2 years
17. Unsuitable vascular anatomy
18. Subject who have a previously implanted surgical wrap of the ascending aorta
19. Any medical condition that, according to the investigator's decision, might expose the subject to increased risk by the investigational device or procedure.
20. An aneurysm that is mycotic, inflammatory or suspected to be infected.
21. Subject with hostile groins/axilla (scarring, obesity, or previous failed puncture) unless conduit are used.
22. Subjects with severe atherosclerosis, severe calcification or extensive intraluminal thrombus of the aorta or in the brachiocephalic trunk
23. Subject is suffering from unstable angina or NYHA classification III and IV.
24. Subject has a known hypersensitivity or contraindication to anticoagulants, antiplatelets, or contrast media, which is not amenable to pre-treatment.
25. Subject with a contraindication to undergo angiography
26. Subject with known sensitivities or allergies to the device materials (including Nitinol \[NiTi\], polyester fabric \[PET\], tantalum \[TA\])
27. Clinical conditions that severely inhibit x-ray visualization of the Aorta.
28. Subject has history of bleeding diathesis or coagulopathy that may limit the use of dual antiplatelet or anticoagulant therapy by the decision of the investigator
29. Acute renal failure; chronic renal failure (excluding dialysis); Creatinine \> 2.00 mg/dl
30. Any other medical, social, or psychological issues that in the opinion of the investigator preclude them from receiving this treatment, or the procedures and evaluations pre- and post- treatment.
31. Active participation in another clinical study that has not completed primary endpoint(s) evaluation or that clinically interferes with the endpoints in this study, or subject is planning to participate in such study prior to the completion of this study.
18 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Endospan Ltd.
INDUSTRY
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
University of Alabama Birmingham
Birmingham, Alabama, United States
University of California San Diego Medical Center
La Jolla, California, United States
UC Davis Health
Sacramento, California, United States
Stanford University School of Medicine
Stanford, California, United States
University of Colorado
Aurora, Colorado, United States
Hartford Hospital
Hartford, Connecticut, United States
MedStar Washington Hospital
Washington D.C., District of Columbia, United States
Advent Health Orlando
Orlando, Florida, United States
Emory University
Atlanta, Georgia, United States
The University of Chicago
Chicago, Illinois, United States
Ascension St. Vincent
Carmel, Indiana, United States
University of Maryland
Baltimore, Maryland, United States
Tufts Medical Center
Boston, Massachusetts, United States
University of Michigan
Ann Arbor, Michigan, United States
Washington University School of Medicine
St Louis, Missouri, United States
The Mount Sinai Medical Center
New York, New York, United States
Northwell Health Lenox Hill Hospital
New York, New York, United States
University of North Carolina
Chapel Hill, North Carolina, United States
Atrium Health
Charlotte, North Carolina, United States
Duke University Medical Center
Durham, North Carolina, United States
The Lindner Research Center
Cincinnati, Ohio, United States
University Hospitals of Cleveland
Cleveland, Ohio, United States
Oregon Health
Portland, Oregon, United States
University of Pennsylvania
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States
Lankenau Medical Center
Wynnewood, Pennsylvania, United States
Medical University of South Carolina
Charleston, South Carolina, United States
Ballad Health
Kingsport, Tennessee, United States
Vanderbilt University Medical Center
Nashville, Tennessee, United States
Baylor Scott and White
Plano, Texas, United States
Sentara Norfolk General Hospital
Norfolk, Virginia, United States
Carilion Clinic
Roanoke, Virginia, United States
Auckland City Hospital
Auckland, Grafton, New Zealand
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Central Contacts
Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.
Facility Contacts
Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
CIP-009
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.