HOPS Study: A Conceptual Replication

NCT ID: NCT04465708

Last Updated: 2025-03-06

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

RECRUITING

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

240 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2021-10-25

Study Completion Date

2028-06-30

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The purpose of this current study is to conduct a conceptual replication with an independent evaluation team of the randomized controlled trial conducted by Langberg and colleagues, which demonstrated the efficacy of the Homework, Organization, and Planning Skills (HOPS) intervention. The study will be conducted under routine practice conditions with school staff serving as interventionists; the study sample will include the broad range of students with organization, time management, and planning problems. The study will examine how implementation factors (fidelity, engagement, working alliance) are related to outcomes, and it will explore the potential moderating role of school organization factors on outcomes.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Organization, time management, and planning (OTMP) skills are associated with academic performance. A randomized controlled trial found that the Homework, Organization, and Planning Skills (HOPS) intervention was effective in improving student organization skills and homework performance, with moderate to large effect sizes. HOPS is a 16-session skills training program, provided individually to students in grades 6 through 8 who have OTMP skills deficits that contribute to academic difficulties. Two parent consultations and one teacher consultation promote generalization and maintenance of effects. The current study is a conceptual replication of the previous HOPS study, conducted by an independent evaluation team. The intervention will be delivered under routine practice conditions, with school staff serving as interventionists. The study will examine how fidelity, engagement, and working alliance are related to outcomes, and it will explore the extent to which school organization factors moderate outcomes. Across 30 schools in Pennsylvania and New Jersey, Investigators will recruit a total of 240 6th, 7th, and 8th grade students with OTMP deficits. Parents and teachers provide data about the students. School counselors, Principals, and an Individualized Education Plan (IEP)/504 Plan Case Manager may provide data about the organizational context of the schools. The intervention is provided individually to students by a member of the school staff or a member of the research team.

Using a cluster randomized design, Investigators will randomize schools to HOPS or Treatment as Usual - Wait List (TAU-WL), ratio of 2:1. In HOPS schools, students will be randomly assigned to receive intervention by school providers (HOPS-ST) or by research team providers (HOPS-RT). Outcomes will be assessed at Baseline and Post-Treatment period for all students, at 5 school months after Baseline assessment for all students in the HOPS condition, and at 12 calendar months after Baseline for students who are in the HOPS condition and who stay in the same school into the following academic year. Participants in TAU-WL will receive HOPS following Post-Treatment data collection. Participants in TAU-WL will be evaluated again a third time with an abridged battery after they receive HOPS.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Executive Dysfunction Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Homework, Organization, and Planning Skills (HOPS)

The Homework, Organization, and Planning Skills (HOPS) intervention is delivered through a series of 16 frequent but brief sessions between the HOPS provider and student. The HOPS intervention will be delivered by either a member of the school team (HOPS-ST), referred to as a "school provider", or a member of the research team (HOPS-RT), referred to as a "research provider". Each session is approximately 20 minutes. The three main skill areas covered as part of the program are: (1) school materials organization, (2) homework management and (3) time management and planning. A reward system is utilized in effort to change behavior patterns by making rewards available when a student engages in productive organizing and planning behaviors. The intervention also includes two parent meetings and one teacher meeting.

Group Type OTHER

Homework, Organization, and Planning Skills

Intervention Type BEHAVIORAL

HOPS is a 16-session, skills training program, provided individually to students in grades 6 through 8 who have OTMP skills deficits that contribute to academic difficulties. HOPS includes two parent consultations and one teacher consultation to promote generalization and maintenance of effects.

Treatment-As-Usual Waitlist (WL-TAU)

The Treatment-As-Usual Waitlist (WL-TAU) will be enacted for study participants attending the enrolled schools assigned to this arm. After providing post data (and in some cases, follow-up data as well), participants will then receive the HOPS intervention.

Group Type NO_INTERVENTION

No interventions assigned to this group

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Homework, Organization, and Planning Skills

HOPS is a 16-session, skills training program, provided individually to students in grades 6 through 8 who have OTMP skills deficits that contribute to academic difficulties. HOPS includes two parent consultations and one teacher consultation to promote generalization and maintenance of effects.

Intervention Type BEHAVIORAL

Other Intervention Names

Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.

HOPS

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

STUDENTS

1. Male or female students in grades 6 through 8.
2. Student is in a general education classroom.
3. Student is nominated for the study by at least one teacher(s) who rates the student as needing the intervention and having OTMP skills deficits that have a negative impact on academic performance (rating \> 3 on a 4-point scale on at least one of four interference items of COSS-T)
4. Parental/guardian permission (informed consent) and student assent.

PARENTS

1\. The parent/legal guardian's child is eligible for the study

SCHOOL PROVIDERS

1\. School providers will be chosen by school administrators as personnel who are capable of delivering the HOPS intervention (HOPS-ST) in the school context.

RESEARCH PROVIDER

1. A person with experience providing instruction or intervention to students in a school context.
2. A member of the research team who will provide the HOPS intervention to the HOPS-RT condition
3. Has consented to be a "secondary research participant"

Exclusion Criteria

STUDENTS

1. Students will be excluded if they are in a pull-out special education classroom for more than 50% of the day, because the organizational demands for these students may differ from those placed mostly in general education.
2. Students with a one-to-one aide will be excluded because the presence of an aide substantially alters how an organizational intervention is implemented.
3. Students from families in which both caregivers do not speak English will be excluded because the program has not yet been developed for non-English speakers.
4. Students who may have participated in HOPS before (as it is a commercially-available program) is not eligible to participate in this study.

PARENTS

1. Parents who are not fluent in English are excluded since at this time because the intervention and many of the study outcome measures are not available in other languages.

SCHOOL PROVIDERS

1\. Any school professional who declines to participate will not be enrolled.

RESEARCH PROVIDERS

1\. Does not consent to be a "secondary research participant"
Minimum Eligible Age

11 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

15 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

University of Pennsylvania

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

U.S. Department of Education

FED

Sponsor Role collaborator

Rutgers University

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

Children's Hospital of Philadelphia

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Thomas Power, PhD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Children's Hospital of Philadelphia

Jenelle Nissley-Tsiopinis, PhD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Children's Hospital of Philadelphia

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Children's Hospital of Philadelphia

Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States

Site Status RECRUITING

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United States

Central Contacts

Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.

Phylicia Fleming

Role: CONTACT

267-542-2534

Jaclyn Cacia

Role: CONTACT

(267) 426-6015

Facility Contacts

Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.

Thomas Power, PhD

Role: primary

Jenelle Nissley-Tsiopinis, PhD

Role: backup

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Langberg JM, Becker SP, Epstein JN, Vaughn AJ, Girio-Herrera E. Predictors of Response and Mechanisms of Change in an Organizational Skills Intervention for Students with ADHD. J Child Fam Stud. 2013 Oct 1;22(6):10.1007/s10826-012-9662-5. doi: 10.1007/s10826-012-9662-5.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 24319323 (View on PubMed)

Langberg JM, Dvorsky MR, Molitor SJ, Bourchtein E, Eddy LD, Smith ZR, Oddo LE, Eadeh HM. Overcoming the research-to-practice gap: A randomized trial with two brief homework and organization interventions for students with ADHD as implemented by school mental health providers. J Consult Clin Psychol. 2018 Jan;86(1):39-55. doi: 10.1037/ccp0000265. Epub 2017 Nov 27.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 29172596 (View on PubMed)

Abikoff H, Gallagher R, Wells KC, Murray DW, Huang L, Lu F, Petkova E. Remediating organizational functioning in children with ADHD: immediate and long-term effects from a randomized controlled trial. J Consult Clin Psychol. 2013 Feb;81(1):113-28. doi: 10.1037/a0029648. Epub 2012 Aug 13.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 22889336 (View on PubMed)

Pfiffner LJ, Villodas M, Kaiser N, Rooney M, McBurnett K. Educational outcomes of a collaborative school-home behavioral intervention for ADHD. Sch Psychol Q. 2013 Mar;28(1):25-36. doi: 10.1037/spq0000016.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 23506023 (View on PubMed)

Langberg JM, Arnold LE, Flowers AM, Altaye M, Epstein JN, Molina BS. Assessing Homework Problems in Children with ADHD: Validation of a Parent-Report Measure and Evaluation of Homework Performance Patterns. School Ment Health. 2010 Mar 1;2(1):3-12. doi: 10.1007/s12310-009-9021-x.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 21544228 (View on PubMed)

Power TJ, Mautone JA, Soffer SL, Clarke AT, Marshall SA, Sharman J, Blum NJ, Glanzman M, Elia J, Jawad AF. A family-school intervention for children with ADHD: results of a randomized clinical trial. J Consult Clin Psychol. 2012 Aug;80(4):611-23. doi: 10.1037/a0028188. Epub 2012 Apr 16.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 22506793 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

19-016865

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.