Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
70 participants
OBSERVATIONAL
2020-06-18
2021-04-01
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Comparison of Fingerstick Versus Venous Sample for Troponin I.
NCT04153006
Point-of-Care Troponin Testing in the Emergency Department
NCT06845826
Aiming Towards Evidence Based Interpretation of Cardiac Biomarkers in Patients Presenting With Chest Pain Using Point of Care Assays
NCT05354804
SpinChip Hs-cTnI Clinical Diagnostic Performance
NCT06499519
Clinical Evaluation of the CADenceTM System in Detection of Coronary Artery Diseases
NCT01584622
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
The Li-hep Plasma vs Li-hep venous blood show a very good correlation of 1.00-1.03 with an R of \>0.99, so the results between these sample types can be used interchangeably. For the capillary sample vs the Li-hep sample (both blood and plasma) the slope is 8-12% higher. With a 8-12% higher response, the capillary test results may not be interchangeably used with the other 2 sample types.
It is remarkable that capillary samples give a higher response, since it was anticipated that the result may be slightly lower due to the possible dilution by interstitial fluid. The investigators hypothesize that the presence of the Li-heparin anti-coagulant in the venous draw lead to a slight reduction of the apparent cTnI concentration. By using a heparin coated transfer device for the capillary samples instead of an uncoated transfer device, this hypothesis will be tested.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
COHORT
RETROSPECTIVE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Chest pain patients
Patients are eligible for participation if they are admitted to:
* The cardiac emergency department (ED) because of chest pain for ruling out acute coronary syndrome by troponin analysis
* The Coronary Care Unit (CCU) with a NSTEMI or post-percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) STEMI.
Troponin analysis will be performed according to standard protocol. From every included patient two capillary blood samples and an extra venous blood sample will be drawn during regularly ordered blood work to evaluate HS cTnI levels obtained with the POC instrument.
Siemens® Point-of-care high sensitive troponin I analyzer
Point-of-care (POC) high sensitive troponin I (HS cTnI) analysis in whole blood, plasma and capillary whole blood with the Siemens® device.
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Siemens® Point-of-care high sensitive troponin I analyzer
Point-of-care (POC) high sensitive troponin I (HS cTnI) analysis in whole blood, plasma and capillary whole blood with the Siemens® device.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Referred to cardiac ED with chest pain suspected of ACS; inclusion at arrival (T=0) or one hour after arrival (T=1).
* Subacute STEMI or NSTEMI patients admitted at the CCU who have an indication for coronary angiography but do not need rescue/emergency PCI.
* STEMI patients who already underwent rescue/emergency PCI; inclusion post PCI.
Exclusion Criteria
* Patients with sudden onset tachycardia and a frequency of 110 bpm or higher (supraventricular or ventricular).
* Patients who are hemodynamically unstable or in which an acute non-coronary diagnosis is suspected, e.g. pulmonary embolism, thoracic aortic dissection etc.
* Patients recently already admitted for the same set of symptoms at a previous healthcare institution before being transferred to the participating clinical site.
* Patients not willing or not able to provide informed consent due to their medical condition as judged by the physician.
18 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Siemens Corporation, Corporate Technology
INDUSTRY
VieCuri Medical Centre
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Braim Rahel
Dr. B.M. Rahel, Principal investigator, Cardiologist
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Braim Rahel, Dr.
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
VieCuri Medical Centre
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Viecuri Medical Center
Venlo, Limburg, Netherlands
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
METCZ20200008
Identifier Type: OTHER
Identifier Source: secondary_id
NL72445.096.20
Identifier Type: OTHER
Identifier Source: secondary_id
Study number 580
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.