Clinical vAliDation of ARTificial Intelligence in POlyp Detection
NCT ID: NCT04442607
Last Updated: 2022-11-30
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
NA
856 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2020-10-13
2022-11-29
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Artificial Intelligence Development for Colorectal Polyp Diagnosis
NCT06447012
Study on the Use of Artificial Intelligence (Fujifilm) for Polyp Detection in Colonoscopy
NCT04894708
Artificial Intelligence Identifying Polyps in Real-world Colonoscopy
NCT03761771
Artificial Intelligence in Colonic Polyp Detection
NCT05178095
Detection of Colonic Polyps Via a Large Scale Artificial Intelligence (AI) System
NCT04693078
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Patients will undergo a standard colonoscopy performed by a trained endoscopist. A second observer, who is not a trained endoscopist, will follow the procedure on a bedside AI-tool to count the number of detections made by the AI system and categorize the results into positive or negative results as follows (1) true positive, (2) false negative or (3) false positive. In case of a detection of the AI-system that was not seen by the endoscopist or unclear to the second observer, the second observer will ask to re-evaluate the indicated region to determine whether after second look the endoscopist has to take extra action. The entire procedure will be recorded.
There are no additional risks specific to the use of the AI tool to be taken into account. General risk of colonoscopy (i.e.: perforation, bleeding or post-polypectomy syndrome) could occur with the same frequency as that of a colonoscopy without the use of this AI tool.
All patients will receive a standard of care protocol during their colonoscopy. The AI system can only have a beneficial outcome for the patient, a better polyp detection, as it has shown to be non-inferior in terms of accuracy when compared to high detecting endoscopist in our pilot trial
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
NA
SINGLE_GROUP
DIAGNOSTIC
NONE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
AI arm
Only one arm in this study. Every patient who is eligible for this study and is included, after informed consent, will receive a standard colonoscopy combined with real-time AI video analysis
artificial intelligence image processing
Patients will undergo a standard colonoscopy performed by a trained endoscopist. A second observer, who is not a trained endoscopist, will follow the procedure on a bedside AI-tool to count the number of detections made by the AI system and categorize the results into positive or negative results as follows (1) true positive, (2) false negative or (3) false positive.
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
artificial intelligence image processing
Patients will undergo a standard colonoscopy performed by a trained endoscopist. A second observer, who is not a trained endoscopist, will follow the procedure on a bedside AI-tool to count the number of detections made by the AI system and categorize the results into positive or negative results as follows (1) true positive, (2) false negative or (3) false positive.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Referral for screening, surveillance or diagnostic colonoscopy
* Able to give informed consent by the patient or by a legal representative
Exclusion Criteria
* Referral for a therapeutic colonoscopy
* Known Lynch syndrome or Familial Adenomatous Polyposis syndrome
* Any contraindication for colonoscopy or biopsies of the colon
* Uncontrolled coagulopathy
* Confirmed diagnosis of inflammatory bowel disease prior to the scheduled colonoscopy
* Short bowel or ileostomy
* Pregnancy
* Colonic inflammation of \> 30cm during colonoscopy
* Incomplete colonoscopy for any reason
* Incomplete recording or technical failure of the artificial intelligence system
40 Years
ALL
Yes
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Nuovo Regina Margherita Hospital, Rome, Italy
UNKNOWN
Krankenhaus Barmherzige Brüder, Regensburg, Germany
UNKNOWN
Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Nantes, Nantes, France
UNKNOWN
Centrum Onkologii-Instytut im. Marii Skłodowskiej-Curie, Warschau, Poland
UNKNOWN
Spire Portsmouth Hospital, Portsmouth, United Kingdom
UNKNOWN
University Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
UNKNOWN
University Hospitals Ghent, Ghent, Belgium
UNKNOWN
Universitaire Ziekenhuizen KU Leuven
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Raf Bisschops, MD,PhD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Universitaire Ziekenhuizen KU Leuven
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
University Hospitals Leuven
Leuven, Vlaams-Brabant, Belgium
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Provided Documents
Download supplemental materials such as informed consent forms, study protocols, or participant manuals.
Document Type: Study Protocol and Statistical Analysis Plan
Document Type: Informed Consent Form
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
S64243
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.