Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
NA
52 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2020-01-01
2020-03-01
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Artificial Intelligence-assisted Colonoscopy on Detection of Missed Proximal Lesions
NCT04294355
Endocuff With or Without AI-assisted Colonoscopy
NCT05133544
Prospective Evalulation of Artificial Intelligence-assisted Monitoring of Effective Withdrawal Time Versus Standard Withdrawal Time on Adenoma Detected Per Colonoscopy
NCT06345105
Artificial Intelligence for Real-time Detection and Monitoring of Colorectal Polyps
NCT04586556
Artificial Intelligence in Colonic Polyp Detection
NCT05178095
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
The primary endoscopist conducted the colonoscopic examination in the usual manner. All colonoscopy procedures were performed with high-definition colonoscopes (EVIS-EXERA 290 video system, Olympus Optical, Tokyo, Japan). The colonoscopy was first advanced to the cecum in all patients as confirmed by identification of the appendiceal orifice and ileocecal valve or by intubation of the ileum. After cecal intubation, the colonoscopy was slowly withdrawn to the rectum by the primary endoscopist. The AI real time detection was then activated with the output displayed in a different monitor and was only viewed by an independent investigator, who was an experienced endoscopist. The primary endoscopist was blinded to the AI real time detection result al.
The colon was divided into three segments during the examination: right side, transverse and left side colon, using hepatic flexure and splenic flexure as dividing landmark. All polyps were marked for size (measured with biopsy forceps), location and morphology according to the Paris classification, and then removed or biopsied for histological examination. After examination of each segment, segmental unblinding of the AI results were provided by the independent viewer. If additional polyps were detected by AI but not by the endoscopist, that segment were reexamined to look for the missed polyp. If no additional polyp was detected by the AI, the next colonic segment was examined. Missed lesions were defined as lesions identified by AI and then confirmed on reexamination by the endoscopist.
The first withdrawal time (minus the polypectomy site) was measured. The Boston Bowel Preparation Scale score (BPPS) was used for evaluation of bowel cleanliness.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
NA
SINGLE_GROUP
DIAGNOSTIC
NONE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Artificial intelligence-Assisted real time colonoscopy
AI assisted real-time detection of colonic lesions
Artificial intelligence-Assisted real time colonoscopy
The colonoscopy was performed under artificial intelligence assistance
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Artificial intelligence-Assisted real time colonoscopy
The colonoscopy was performed under artificial intelligence assistance
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
Exclusion Criteria
* Also, patients with history of inflammatory bowel disease, familial adenomatous polyposis, Peutz-Jeghers syndrome or other polyposis syndromes were excluded.
40 Years
90 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
The University of Hong Kong
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
LEUNG Wai Keung
Clinical Professor
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Ka Luen, Thomas Lui
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Queen Mary Hospital, the University of Hong Kong
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Queen Mary Hospital
Hong Kong, , Hong Kong
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Lui TKL, Hui CKY, Tsui VWM, Cheung KS, Ko MKL, Foo DCC, Mak LY, Yeung CK, Lui TH, Wong SY, Leung WK. New insights on missed colonic lesions during colonoscopy through artificial intelligence-assisted real-time detection (with video). Gastrointest Endosc. 2021 Jan;93(1):193-200.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2020.04.066. Epub 2020 May 4.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
UW 19-309
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.