Clinical Outcome of the Dynamic Reconstruction of the Medial Patellofemoral Ligament (MPFL)
NCT ID: NCT04438109
Last Updated: 2021-03-19
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
152 participants
OBSERVATIONAL
2019-04-12
2021-02-27
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Comparison of Dynamic and Static Medial Patellofemoral Ligament Operation Technique for Recurrent Patellar Dislocation
NCT04849130
Arthroscopic Clinical Study of Double Bundle Anatomical Reconstruction of Medial Patellofemoral Ligament
NCT04456881
Evaluation of Adductor Magnus Tenodesis in Patients With Recurrent Patellar Dislocation.
NCT05184439
Medial Patellofemoral Ligament Reconstruction: A Review of Technique, Accuracy, and Outcome
NCT01405729
The Comprehensive Assessment in Children After Surgical Treatment of Patellar Recurrent Dislocation.
NCT03983213
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Inclusion criteria:
* Dynamic MPFL-reconstruction (primary and revision surgery) including cartilage procedure
* Age of 18 years or older at a minimum of 24 months follow up
Exclusion criteria:
* Diagnosis of connective tissue disease
* Neurological diseases including patella associated spasticity and
* Concomitant alignment correction surgery including femoral/tibial osteotomy, trochleoplasty and tibial tubercle transfer
213 Patients with 221 knees (8 bilateral) met the inclusion criteria. All patients were contacted by mail or phone to independently answer questionnaires.
Surgical technique:
The technique was performed according to the description by Ostermeier et al.. Briefly, the gracilis tendon is detached at its insertion site at the pes anserinus after opening the sartorius fascia. Instead of transferring the tendon through a subligamentous tunnel of the medial collateral ligament, as detailed in the original description of the technique, the tendon was passed around the incised sartorius fascia. From around the sartorius fascia the gracilis tendon is shuttled subcutaneously to the medial patellar margin, allowing the sartorius fascia to act as a pulley for the transferred tendon. Due to the dynamic reconstruction technique, the course of the graft appears to be more oblique compared to the static technique with femoral fixation at Schöttle's point. Fixation of the tendon is achieved by passing it through a transpatellar drill hole extending from the proximal medial patellar margin to the lateral patellar margin. The tendon is then tensioned with the knee in 30 degrees of flexion and fixed with a bioabsorbable tenodesis screw.
Data collection was performed by self-administered questionnaires, which were sent to the patients.
The medical records and radiographs of all patients were reviewed for demographic information (age, sex) and to identify complications related to the surgical procedure. Complications were categorized as major if the patient returned to the operating room or required hospitalization after the index procedure. Complications were categorized as minor complications if they were treated on an outpatient basis.
Rating of the results was performed using the Kujala score, the Norwich Patellar Instability Score and the BANFF Score.
Pain level was recorded using the visual analogue scale (VAS, 0 = no pain, 10 = severe pain). General satisfaction with treatment outcomes was evaluated by questionnaire (1 = excellent, 2 = very good, 3 = good, 4 = fair, 5 = poor, 6 = very poor) and by asking patients whether they would undergo the procedure again. Furthermore, information on patient characteristics, recurrence of dislocation, revision surgery, and other postoperative complications were recorded.
Postoperative x-rays were analyzed concerning intraoperative complications (e.g. fractures or patellar drill hole malpositioning).
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
CASE_ONLY
RETROSPECTIVE
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Age \>18 years
Exclusion Criteria
* Known neurogenic diseases
* Significant further musculoskeletal disorders
18 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Hannover Medical School
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Orthopädische Klinik der Medizinischen Hochschule Hannover im DIAKOVERE Annastift
Hanover, Lower Saxony, Germany
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Horstmann H, Karkosch R, Berg A, Becher C, Petri M, Smith T. The novel dynamic MPFL-reconstruction technique: cheaper and better? Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2022 Aug;142(8):2011-2017. doi: 10.1007/s00402-021-04198-z. Epub 2021 Oct 11.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
8262_BO_K_2019
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.