Activation Failure of Knee Extensors After Anterior Cruciate Ligament Rupture Depending on the Contraction Mode

NCT ID: NCT06783062

Last Updated: 2025-01-20

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

NOT_YET_RECRUITING

Total Enrollment

60 participants

Study Classification

OBSERVATIONAL

Study Start Date

2025-02-28

Study Completion Date

2027-12-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The primary objective of the study is to evaluate the impact of ACL injury and ACL reconstruction on voluntary activation during maximal voluntary contraction (measured by neurophysiological parameters) according to the contraction mode.

The goal is to provide elements of knowledge to clinicians about the mechanisms of the activation failure depending on contraction mode, but also the resulting adapted clinical recommendations for conducting rehabilitation, and particularly for the use of different contraction modes.

The main hypothesis is that activation failure is not equal according to the contraction mode during maximal voluntary contractions and neurophysiological parameters will be decreased in comparison with non-injured subjects.

Secondary objectives are:

* To analyze the evolution of neurophysiological parameters between sessions interspaced by several months according to the contraction mode.
* To observe this time evolution depending on the treatment strategy chosen: rehabilitation or surgery plus rehabilitation.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

ACL - Anterior Cruciate Ligament Rupture Activation Failure Contraction Mode

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Observational Model Type

CASE_CONTROL

Study Time Perspective

PROSPECTIVE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Control

No interventions assigned to this group

ACL - rehabilitation

No interventions assigned to this group

ACL - surgery + rehabilitation

No interventions assigned to this group

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

A. ACL-injured groups (surgically or conservatively treated):

1. Age between 18 and 50 years
2. Free, informed consent signed by the participant and the investigator.
3. Session 1: Delay of 2 to 6 weeks after injury, with a quiet knee (range of motion 110- 0°, minimal effusion, maximal contraction pain ≤ 2/10)
4. Session 2: Duration of 36 to 42 weeks after injury, with a quiet knee (range of motion 110-0°, minimal effusion, maximal contraction pain ≤ 2/10)
5. Independent person (Unprotected: under guardianship, curatorship or other legal protection, deprived of liberty by judicial or administrative decision)

B. ControlGroup:

1. Age between 18 and 50 years
2. Free, informed consent signed by the participant and the investigator.
3. Sport practitioners: at least once per week practicing activities like collective sports, racket sports, combat sports, skiing, or on-loading activities with changing of directions.
4. Independent person (Unprotected: under guardianship, curatorship or other legal protection, deprived of liberty by judicial or administrative decision)

Exclusion Criteria

* 1\. Subjects fitted with an implanted electronic device such as a cardiac pacemaker 2. Professional athlete 3. Pregnant women 4. Subject with systemic pathology or treatment affecting the musculoskeletal system 5. Subject with a history of neurological pathology or traumatic pathology, or pathology that required orthopedic treatment and/or surgery of the knee, hip and/or lumbar spine 6. Contraindication to isokinetic testing: incapacitating pain, evolving pathological process, non- healed fracture, unbalanced cardiovascular pathology (angina pectoris, arterial hypertension) 7. Contralateral knee injury 8. Subject inability to follow procedures or insufficient knowledge of project language 9. Data acquisition issue or injury during testing
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

50 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Toulouse NeuroImaging Center (ToNIC - UMR 1214 Inserm/UPS)

UNKNOWN

Sponsor Role collaborator

La Tour Hospital

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Simon Barrué-Belou

Physiotherapist PhD., in charge of Biomechanics

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Central Contacts

Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.

Simon Barrué-Belou, PhD

Role: CONTACT

+41 22 719 78 92

François Fourchet, PhD

Role: CONTACT

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

2024-01580

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.