Retrospective Study of Patients With Severe Aplastic Anemia Who Relapsed After Immunosuppressive Therapy

NCT ID: NCT04436380

Last Updated: 2023-03-16

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Total Enrollment

173 participants

Study Classification

OBSERVATIONAL

Study Start Date

2020-06-15

Study Completion Date

2023-03-15

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Background:

Severe aplastic anemia (SAA) is a form of bone marrow failure. It usually results from a

cytotoxic T cell attack on the marrow stem cell. Two treatments can be used for most people with SAA. One is allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplant (HSCT). The other is immunosuppressive treatment (IST). For people who are treated with IST, relapse can occur. If this happens, they can have HSCT or be re-treated with IST. The two most common IST regimes used for relapsed SAA are rabbit ATG (rATG) and alemtuzumab. Both rATG and alemtuzumab have similar response rates and survival rates. There is not much long-term data on people who need repeat IST treatment due to relapse. Researchers want to look at data from past studies to learn more.

Objective:

To compare the data of relapsed SAA patients between those who received alemtuzumab versus rATG for repeat IST treatment.

Eligibility:

Adults and children with SAA who were enrolled on NHLBI protocol 12-H-0150, 06-H-0034, 05-H-0242, 03-H-0249, 03-H-0193, 00-H-0032, or 90-H-0146

Design:

This study uses data from past studies. The participants in those studies have allowed their data to be used in future research.

Researchers will review participants medical records. They will collect clinical data, such as notes, test results, and imaging scans. They will also collect the research data gathered as part of the original study.

Researchers will enter the data into an in-house database. It is password protected. All data will be kept in secure network drives or in secure sites.

Other studies may be added in the future....

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Severe aplastic anemia (SAA) is a form of bone marrow failure and in most cases is the result of a cytotoxic T cell attack on the marrow stem cell. It is effectively treated in most patients with either immunosuppressive treatment (IST) or upfront allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplant (HSCT). However, in patients who are treated with IST, relapse remains an issue with a rate of 30-40%. Once relapsed, patients can be either re-treated with IST or undergo HSCT. The two most common IST regimes used for relapsed SAA are rabbit ATG (rATG) and alemtuzumab. Both rATG and alemtuzumab have been shown to have a response rate of approximately 60% in relapsed patients with similar overall survival rates of 83-85%. Previous predictors of relapse include time from diagnosis to IST, and early response to IST. Few long-term data exist on patients requiring repeat IST treatment due to relapse.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Severe Aplastic Anemia

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Observational Model Type

COHORT

Study Time Perspective

RETROSPECTIVE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Relapsed SAA Patients

Patients with Severe Aplastic Anemia who Relapsed after Immunosuppressive Therapy

No interventions assigned to this group

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* This is a retrospective chart review. The investigators will review the medical records of adults and children with severe aplastic anemia (SAA) enrolled on immunosuppressive therapy (IST) treatment protocols in the NHLBI.

Exclusion Criteria

Patients who opted out of future use of data on their prior studies will be excluded from this study.
Minimum Eligible Age

2 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (NHLBI)

NIH

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Emma M Groarke, M.D.

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (NHLBI)

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

National Heart, Lung and Blood Institute (NHLBI)

Bethesda, Maryland, United States

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United States

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

20-H-N119

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: secondary_id

999920119

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.