Comparing Therapies for the Treatment of Severe Aplastic Anemia

NCT ID: NCT00001626

Last Updated: 2020-09-22

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

PHASE2

Total Enrollment

33 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

1997-06-02

Study Completion Date

2008-03-03

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Severe Aplastic Anemia (SAA) is a rare and very serious blood disorder in which the bone marrow stops producing the cells which make up blood; red blood cells, white blood cells, and platelets.

Researchers believe this is caused by an autoimmune reaction, a condition in which the natural defense system of the body begins attacking itself. In SAA the immune system begins attacking the bone marrow. Red blood cells are responsible for carrying oxygen to all of the organ systems in the body, and low numbers (anemia) can cause difficulty breathing and fatigue. Platelets are responsible for normal blood clotting and low numbers can result in easy bruising and bleeding which can be deadly. White blood cells are responsible for fighting infections, and low numbers of these can lead to frequent infections, the most common cause of death in patients with aplastic anemia.

SAA can be treated by bone marrow transplant (BMT) or by drugs designed to slow down the immune system (immunosuppressants). BMT can be successful, but it requires a donor with matched bone marrow, making this therapy available only to a few patients. BMT with unmatched bone marrow can fail and cause dangerous side effects.

Presently, the two drugs used to treat SAA by slowing down the immune system (immunosuppression) are antithymocyte globulin (ATG) and cyclosporin A (CSA). When used in combination these two drugs can improve most patients condition. However, one third of the patients who respond to this therapy experience a relapse of SAA. In addition, some patients treated with ATG/CSA can later develop other disorders of the blood.

Recently, researchers have found that another immunosuppressive drug called cyclophosphamide, has been successful at treating patients with SAA. In addition, patients treated with cyclophosphamide do not experience relapses or develop other disorders of the blood.

In this study researchers would like to compare the combinations of antithymocyte globulin (ATG) and cyclosporin A (CSA) to cyclophosphamide and cyclosporin A (CSA) for the treatment of SAA.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Severe aplastic anemia (SAA) is a disorder with a poor prognosis if untreated. Current accepted therapeutic strategies include bone marrow transplantation (BMT) and immunosuppression, both offering cure or amelioration in the majority of patients. Although BMT is successful using human leukocyte antigen (HLA) matched sibling bone marrow, the 25% probability of finding an HLA identical sibling within a family renders this approach available to only a minority of patients. BMT utilizing HLA-matched, unrelated donors carries a high risk of treatment failure along with considerable toxicity. While combined immunosuppression with both antithymocyte globulin (ATG) and cyclosporine A (CSA) produces hematologic improvement in most patients, relapse is common, occurring in about a third of responders. Late evolution of aplastic anemia to other serious hematologic disorders is a significant problem following successful treatment with ATG/CSA with paroxysmal nocturnal hemoglobinuria (PNH) occurs in approximately 13%, myelodysplasia in about 10%, and acute leukemia in about 7%. Recently, results of immunosuppression in SAA with another potent immunosuppressive agent, cyclophosphamide, were reported in 10 patients. In this small group, the overall response rate was similar to that seen with ATG/CSA, but relapse and late clonal disease were not seen during a median follow-up of greater than 10 years. In the larger randomized trial proposed here, we will compare sustained hematologic response rates to either conventional immunosuppression with ATG/CSA or high dose cyclophosphamide and CSA. Secondary endpoints include response duration, event free survival, and overall survival.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Severe Aplastic Anemia (SAA)

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

CROSSOVER

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

A

D1-4 cyclophosphamide 50 mg/kg IV, then cyclosporine starting on d14 at 12 mg/kg/d for 6 months

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

cyclophosphamide

Intervention Type DRUG

cyclophosphamide

cyclosporine

Intervention Type DRUG

cyclosporine

B

ATG at 40 mg/kg/d for 4 days then cyclosporine at 12 mg /kg/d for 6 months

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

antithymocyte globulin

Intervention Type DRUG

antithymocyte globulin

cyclosporine

Intervention Type DRUG

cyclosporine

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

antithymocyte globulin

antithymocyte globulin

Intervention Type DRUG

cyclophosphamide

cyclophosphamide

Intervention Type DRUG

cyclosporine

cyclosporine

Intervention Type DRUG

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

Severe aplastic anemia confirmed at NIH by:

1. Bone marrow cellularity less than thirty percent (excluding lymphocytes).
2. At least two of the following:

Absolute neutrophil count less that 500/mm(3);

Platelet count less than 20,000/mm(3);

Reticulocyte count less than 60,000/mm(3).

Exclusion Criteria

Serum creatinine greater than to 2.5 mg/dl.

Cardiac ejection fraction less than 45% by MUGA.

Underlying carcinoma (except local cervical, basal cell, squamous cell or melanoma).

Current pregnancy or unwilling to take oral contraceptives.

Diagnosis of Fanconi anemia or other congenital bone marrow failure syndromes.

Evidence of a clonal disorder on cytogenetics.

HIV positivity.

Inability to understand the investigational nature of the study.

Patients who are moribund or have hepatic, renal, cardiac, metabolic or other concurrent diseases of such severity that death within 7-10 days is likely.

Previous treatment with ATG, or cyclophosphamide.
Minimum Eligible Age

15 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

110 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (NHLBI)

NIH

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Neal S Young, M.D.

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (NHLBI)

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

National Institutes of Health Clinical Center, 9000 Rockville Pike

Bethesda, Maryland, United States

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United States

Related Links

Access external resources that provide additional context or updates about the study.

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

97-H-0117

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: secondary_id

970117

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.