Rapid Breath-hold Quantitative Macromolecular Proton Fraction Imaging for Liver Fibrosis
NCT ID: NCT04429100
Last Updated: 2023-02-08
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
UNKNOWN
200 participants
OBSERVATIONAL
2021-03-01
2024-06-30
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Liver fibrosis is characterized by excessive deposition of collagen-rich connective tissues in the liver. The macromolecular proton fraction (MPF) is an MRI parameter which characterizes the magnetization transfer (MT) effect in tissues. Quantitative MPF imaging is non-invasive and can be used to measure collagen deposition in the liver due to the strong MT effect of collagen. It has been reported MPF quantification can be used for diagnosis of early-stage liver fibrosis. However, the existing approaches require B1, B0, and T1 map in addition to the imaging data for MPF quantification, which makes it challenging to adopt them for routine clinical use.
The investigators propose a fast and robust MPF quantification approach. In contrast to the existing methods which rely on saturation radiofrequency pulses for MPF quantification, our approach is based on spin-lock radiofrequency pulses which have minimum Rabi oscillations. The whole imaging data can be acquired within a breath-hold less than 8 seconds. Our approach only needs a B1 map in addition to the imaging data for MPF quantification. The preliminary clinical studies on 3.0T MRI show the measurement using our approach is specific to collagen content and can be used to detect early-stage liver fibrosis. To further confirm the clinical value of the proposed approach, the investigators will investigate the relationship of the collagen content measured using the proposed non-invasive imaging approach and those measured based on morphometry analysis of histology, and determine the diagnostic value of the proposed method for detection of early stage liver fibrosis in a large cohort. The investigators will also perform comparative studies of the proposed method and the state-of-the-art quantitative MPF imaging technique.
This project will provide a diagnostic technology for early detection of liver fibrosis. The proposed MRI technology also has potential to be used for other clinical purposes.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Development of Non-Invasive MRI Applications for Liver Fibrosis and Inflammation
NCT05168982
Quantitative Diagnosis of Liver Fibrosis on Multiparametric MRI
NCT03176797
Simultaneous Quantification of Liver Fat Content, Fatty Acid Composition, and Fibrosis Using Spin-lock MRI for Steatohepatitis Assessment
NCT05384652
Quantitative MRI Imaging in Diffuse Liver Diseases
NCT04626492
Methods to Detect Liver Fibrosis
NCT03027700
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
COHORT
RETROSPECTIVE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
liver fibrosis stage F0
Magnetic Resonance Imaging
One novel MRI sequence, i.e. the quantitative imaging of macromolecular proton fraction (MPF), will be introduced into this study. MPF is defined as the relative amount of protons associated with macromolecules involved in magnetization exchange with free water protons. This parameter is independent of the pool model used for quantification and the pulse sequences used for data acquisition. Recent studies have found a strong association between MPF and collagen content in the fibrotic liver, indicating MPF is a potential biomarker of early-stage liver fibrosis.
early-stage liver fibrosis (F1-2)
Magnetic Resonance Imaging
One novel MRI sequence, i.e. the quantitative imaging of macromolecular proton fraction (MPF), will be introduced into this study. MPF is defined as the relative amount of protons associated with macromolecules involved in magnetization exchange with free water protons. This parameter is independent of the pool model used for quantification and the pulse sequences used for data acquisition. Recent studies have found a strong association between MPF and collagen content in the fibrotic liver, indicating MPF is a potential biomarker of early-stage liver fibrosis.
late-stage liver fibrosis (F3-4)
Magnetic Resonance Imaging
One novel MRI sequence, i.e. the quantitative imaging of macromolecular proton fraction (MPF), will be introduced into this study. MPF is defined as the relative amount of protons associated with macromolecules involved in magnetization exchange with free water protons. This parameter is independent of the pool model used for quantification and the pulse sequences used for data acquisition. Recent studies have found a strong association between MPF and collagen content in the fibrotic liver, indicating MPF is a potential biomarker of early-stage liver fibrosis.
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Magnetic Resonance Imaging
One novel MRI sequence, i.e. the quantitative imaging of macromolecular proton fraction (MPF), will be introduced into this study. MPF is defined as the relative amount of protons associated with macromolecules involved in magnetization exchange with free water protons. This parameter is independent of the pool model used for quantification and the pulse sequences used for data acquisition. Recent studies have found a strong association between MPF and collagen content in the fibrotic liver, indicating MPF is a potential biomarker of early-stage liver fibrosis.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* patients with histology-proven liver fibrosis, including those with liver fibrosis stage F0, early-stage liver fibrosis (F1-2), and late stage.
liver fibrosis(F3-4).
* patient aged 18 years old and above.
2. Healthy control group
* controls aged 18 years old and above.
Exclusion Criteria
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Chinese University of Hong Kong
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Chen Weitian
Professor
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Prince of Wale Hospital
Hong Kong, Shatin, Hong Kong
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Central Contacts
Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.
Facility Contacts
Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Sandrin L, Fourquet B, Hasquenoph JM, Yon S, Fournier C, Mal F, Christidis C, Ziol M, Poulet B, Kazemi F, Beaugrand M, Palau R. Transient elastography: a new noninvasive method for assessment of hepatic fibrosis. Ultrasound Med Biol. 2003 Dec;29(12):1705-13. doi: 10.1016/j.ultrasmedbio.2003.07.001.
Yin M, Talwalkar JA, Glaser KJ, Manduca A, Grimm RC, Rossman PJ, Fidler JL, Ehman RL. Assessment of hepatic fibrosis with magnetic resonance elastography. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2007 Oct;5(10):1207-1213.e2. doi: 10.1016/j.cgh.2007.06.012.
Huwart L, Sempoux C, Vicaut E, Salameh N, Annet L, Danse E, Peeters F, ter Beek LC, Rahier J, Sinkus R, Horsmans Y, Van Beers BE. Magnetic resonance elastography for the noninvasive staging of liver fibrosis. Gastroenterology. 2008 Jul;135(1):32-40. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2008.03.076. Epub 2008 Apr 4.
Heye T, Yang SR, Bock M, Brost S, Weigand K, Longerich T, Kauczor HU, Hosch W. MR relaxometry of the liver: significant elevation of T1 relaxation time in patients with liver cirrhosis. Eur Radiol. 2012 Jun;22(6):1224-32. doi: 10.1007/s00330-012-2378-5. Epub 2012 Feb 3.
Banerjee R, Pavlides M, Tunnicliffe EM, Piechnik SK, Sarania N, Philips R, Collier JD, Booth JC, Schneider JE, Wang LM, Delaney DW, Fleming KA, Robson MD, Barnes E, Neubauer S. Multiparametric magnetic resonance for the non-invasive diagnosis of liver disease. J Hepatol. 2014 Jan;60(1):69-77. doi: 10.1016/j.jhep.2013.09.002. Epub 2013 Sep 12.
Faria SC, Ganesan K, Mwangi I, Shiehmorteza M, Viamonte B, Mazhar S, Peterson M, Kono Y, Santillan C, Casola G, Sirlin CB. MR imaging of liver fibrosis: current state of the art. Radiographics. 2009 Oct;29(6):1615-35. doi: 10.1148/rg.296095512.
Tan CH, Venkatesh SK. Magnetic Resonance Elastography and Other Magnetic Resonance Imaging Techniques in Chronic Liver Disease: Current Status and Future Directions. Gut Liver. 2016 Sep 15;10(5):672-86. doi: 10.5009/gnl15492.
Imajo K, Kessoku T, Honda Y, Tomeno W, Ogawa Y, Mawatari H, Fujita K, Yoneda M, Taguri M, Hyogo H, Sumida Y, Ono M, Eguchi Y, Inoue T, Yamanaka T, Wada K, Saito S, Nakajima A. Magnetic Resonance Imaging More Accurately Classifies Steatosis and Fibrosis in Patients With Nonalcoholic Fatty Liver Disease Than Transient Elastography. Gastroenterology. 2016 Mar;150(3):626-637.e7. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2015.11.048. Epub 2015 Dec 8.
Park CC, Nguyen P, Hernandez C, Bettencourt R, Ramirez K, Fortney L, Hooker J, Sy E, Savides MT, Alquiraish MH, Valasek MA, Rizo E, Richards L, Brenner D, Sirlin CB, Loomba R. Magnetic Resonance Elastography vs Transient Elastography in Detection of Fibrosis and Noninvasive Measurement of Steatosis in Patients With Biopsy-Proven Nonalcoholic Fatty Liver Disease. Gastroenterology. 2017 Feb;152(3):598-607.e2. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2016.10.026. Epub 2016 Oct 27.
Castera L, Foucher J, Bernard PH, Carvalho F, Allaix D, Merrouche W, Couzigou P, de Ledinghen V. Pitfalls of liver stiffness measurement: a 5-year prospective study of 13,369 examinations. Hepatology. 2010 Mar;51(3):828-35. doi: 10.1002/hep.23425.
Arena U, Vizzutti F, Corti G, Ambu S, Stasi C, Bresci S, Moscarella S, Boddi V, Petrarca A, Laffi G, Marra F, Pinzani M. Acute viral hepatitis increases liver stiffness values measured by transient elastography. Hepatology. 2008 Feb;47(2):380-4. doi: 10.1002/hep.22007.
Stikov N, Keenan KE, Pauly JM, Smith RL, Dougherty RF, Gold GE. Cross-relaxation imaging of human articular cartilage. Magn Reson Med. 2011 Sep;66(3):725-34. doi: 10.1002/mrm.22865. Epub 2011 Mar 17.
Sritanyaratana N, Samsonov A, Mossahebi P, Wilson JJ, Block WF, Kijowski R. Cross-relaxation imaging of human patellar cartilage in vivo at 3.0T. Osteoarthritis Cartilage. 2014 Oct;22(10):1568-76. doi: 10.1016/j.joca.2014.06.004.
Yarnykh VL, Tartaglione EV, Ioannou GN. Fast macromolecular proton fraction mapping of the human liver in vivo for quantitative assessment of hepatic fibrosis. NMR Biomed. 2015 Dec;28(12):1716-25. doi: 10.1002/nbm.3437. Epub 2015 Oct 27.
Sled JG, Pike GB. Quantitative imaging of magnetization transfer exchange and relaxation properties in vivo using MRI. Magn Reson Med. 2001 Nov;46(5):923-31. doi: 10.1002/mrm.1278.
Ramani A, Dalton C, Miller DH, Tofts PS, Barker GJ. Precise estimate of fundamental in-vivo MT parameters in human brain in clinically feasible times. Magn Reson Imaging. 2002 Dec;20(10):721-31. doi: 10.1016/s0730-725x(02)00598-2.
Yarnykh VL. Pulsed Z-spectroscopic imaging of cross-relaxation parameters in tissues for human MRI: theory and clinical applications. Magn Reson Med. 2002 May;47(5):929-39. doi: 10.1002/mrm.10120.
Gochberg DF, Gore JC. Quantitative magnetization transfer imaging via selective inversion recovery with short repetition times. Magn Reson Med. 2007 Feb;57(2):437-41. doi: 10.1002/mrm.21143.
Gloor M, Scheffler K, Bieri O. Quantitative magnetization transfer imaging using balanced SSFP. Magn Reson Med. 2008 Sep;60(3):691-700. doi: 10.1002/mrm.21705.
Helms G, Hagberg GE. In vivo quantification of the bound pool T1 in human white matter using the binary spin-bath model of progressive magnetization transfer saturation. Phys Med Biol. 2009 Dec 7;54(23):N529-40. doi: 10.1088/0031-9155/54/23/N01. Epub 2009 Nov 11.
Soellinger M, Langkammer C, Seifert-Held T, Fazekas F, Ropele S. Fast bound pool fraction mapping using stimulated echoes. Magn Reson Med. 2011 Sep;66(3):717-24. doi: 10.1002/mrm.22846. Epub 2011 Mar 24.
Yarnykh VL. Fast macromolecular proton fraction mapping from a single off-resonance magnetization transfer measurement. Magn Reson Med. 2012 Jul;68(1):166-78. doi: 10.1002/mrm.23224. Epub 2011 Dec 21.
Nehrke K, Bornert P. DREAM--a novel approach for robust, ultrafast, multislice B(1) mapping. Magn Reson Med. 2012 Nov;68(5):1517-26. doi: 10.1002/mrm.24158. Epub 2012 Jan 17.
Wong GL, Wong VW, Choi PC, Chan AW, Chum RH, Chan HK, Lau KK, Chim AM, Yiu KK, Chan FK, Sung JJ, Chan HL. Assessment of fibrosis by transient elastography compared with liver biopsy and morphometry in chronic liver diseases. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2008 Sep;6(9):1027-35. doi: 10.1016/j.cgh.2008.02.038. Epub 2008 May 5.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
2019.660
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.