Cost Effective Non Invasive Diagnostic Modalities and Predictive Model for Development and Progression of Fibrosis Among Patients With Hepatitis B, Hepatitis C Infection or Non Alcoholic Fatty Liver Disease

NCT ID: NCT02658786

Last Updated: 2019-10-09

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

WITHDRAWN

Study Classification

OBSERVATIONAL

Study Start Date

2016-01-31

Study Completion Date

2020-12-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Chronic liver diseases of differing etiologies are among the leading causes of morbidity and mortality worldwide \[1\]. Chronic liver disease progresses through different pathological stages that vary from mild hepatic inflammation without fibrosis to advanced hepatic fibrosis and cirrhosis \[2\]. Assessment of the stage of liver disease is important for diagnosis, treatment, and follow-up both during treatment and after cessation of treatment. A liver biopsy is the oldest and most accurate method used to evaluate liver histology and the progression of chronic liver disease. Furthermore, different histological scoring systems have been developed and modified \[3\]. A liver biopsy is considered the gold standard for assessing liver histology \[4\]. During the pathological progression of liver fibrosis, excessive amounts of extracellular matrix build up; furthermore, serum levels of various biomarkers change, in addition to the appearance of new biomarkers in the serum during the different stages of fibrosis \[2, 5\]. Recently many noninvasive markers (NIMs) for assessing liver fibrosis have been developed, and they are frequently used in clinical practice. They have been validated in different studies, and some were found to be highly accurate in the assessment of liver fibrosis compared with liver biopsies \[6-7\], which have always been used as the standard reference method for evaluating the accuracy of noninvasive methods. There are limited studies documenting the cost effectiveness of non invasive markers over invasive technique.

Most people with chronic Hepatitis B or C are unaware of their infection, putting them at serious risk of developing cirrhosis or liver cancer which are life threatening. Similarly patients with non alcoholic fatty liver diseases are unaware about fibrosis in liver. About 20-50% of persistent infection ends up into fibrosis and finally cirrhosis. Invasive and non invasive diagnostic methods are widely used to detect the fibrosis. Clinicians use different drugs and combinations to treat HBV and HCV infections. However, there is scarcity of a longitudinal prospective study to assess the cost effectiveness of these diagnostic measures.

We planned to conduct a retrospective followed by prospective cohort study among all cases that underwent biopsy in ILBS or GB Pant Hospital since 2000 till Dec 2020 with HBV infection, HCV infection, or non alcoholic fatty liver disease. For retrospective cohort study, we will collect data from hospital information system for all patients with HBV infection, HCV infection, or non alcoholic fatty liver disease, who underwent biopsy during the period of 2000-Dec 2015. The new patients with HBV infection, HCV infection, or non alcoholic fatty liver disease who will undergo biopsy during the period Jan 2016- Dec 2020 will serve as a cohort for prospective design.

We will collect socio-demographic data, clinical data, family history, personal history, medical history, anthropometry, biochemical and radiological data from each patient. We will also be conducting a cost effective analysis for various non invasive markers against biopsy as a gold standard in predicting fibrosis, both for retrospective and prospective cohorts.

For prospective cohort study, after evaluation of baseline biopsy results, the cases with metavir fibrosis score (F0-3) will be followed for a period of 5 years to document incidence of development and progression of fibrosis.

No additional investigation or test will be asked to the patient for the study. We will also develop a predicting model for development and progression of fibrosis.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

HBV NAFLD HCV

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Observational Model Type

COHORT

Study Time Perspective

PROSPECTIVE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Hepatitis B patients

Biopsy proven Hepatitis B virus infected cases will be followed for the period of 5 years

No interventions assigned to this group

Hepatitis C patients

Biopsy proven Hepatitis C virus infected cases will be followed for the period of 5 years

No interventions assigned to this group

Non Alcoholic Fatty liver Disease patients

Biopsy proven Non Alcoholic Fatty liver Disease patients cases will be followed for the period of 5 years

No interventions assigned to this group

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Age 18 years and above
* Patients who underwent liver biopsy with underlying etiology as HBV, HCV, NASH or cryptogenic or ALD (inpatient or outpatient)
* Metavir Fibrosis Score F0-3 for prospective study design

Exclusion Criteria

* Not willing to participate in the study
* Patients with chronic liver disease of other
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

60 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Institute of Liver and Biliary Sciences, India

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Dr Ajeet Singh Bhadoria, MD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Institute of Liver and Biliary Sciences

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Institute of liver and Biliary Sciences

New Delhi, National Capital Territory of Delhi, India

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

India

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

ILBS-cohort-001

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

68Ga-FAPI PET/CT in Liver Fibrosis Patients
NCT04533828 UNKNOWN EARLY_PHASE1
Identification of Liver Fibrosis Biomarkers
NCT06819917 NOT_YET_RECRUITING