A Prospective Cohort Study Comparing Disparity in Surgical Procedure (Wide Local Excision Only vs Any Other Surgery Procedures) Among the Elderly Breast Cancer Patients

NCT ID: NCT04426136

Last Updated: 2020-06-11

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

NOT_YET_RECRUITING

Total Enrollment

300 participants

Study Classification

OBSERVATIONAL

Study Start Date

2020-06-30

Study Completion Date

2027-06-30

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The incidence and mortality rates of breast cancer are still increasing in both developing and developed countries. The number of women ≥70 years who are affected by breast cancer (BC) worldwide is also on the increase. Based on the largest population and increasing aging, BC is also rapidly increasing among the elderly in China. According to the epidemiological profile data regarding BC in China, the second onset age peak of BC morbidity occurred after 70 years old and in 2020, the proportion of patients older than 65 is expected to exceed one-fifth and reach 27.0% by 2030. However, some controversies remain to be resolved due to the lack of high quality evidence. The tumor biological behavior, treatment choice and treatment tolerance among the elderly prominently differ from their young counterparts. Besides, they are rarely enrolled in large-scale randomized clinical trials or prospective cohort studies and the results are obtained mainly from retrospective studies. Also, frequent deviations from the standard guidelines lead to insufficient or excessive treatments, though the so-called standard guidelines are based on the clinicopathological characteristics and research findings among the younger BC patients. Studies focusing on the global population confirmed that the biological behavior of tumors among elderly patients was more favorable compared with younger patients but did not transform into survival benefits eventually. Numerous prospective, randomized trials have demonstrated that breast conserving surgery (BCS), consisting of segmental mastectomy and radiation treatment with or without axillary lymph node dissection (ALND), is equivalent to mastectomy in terms of overall survival (OS) and disease free survival (DFS) for patients with early stage breast carcinoma. Presentation of the ACOZOG-Z011 study results in 2011 resulted in a downward trend in the use of a completion axillary lymph node dissection in early breast cancer patients with 1-2 positive sentinel lymph nodes (SLN), treated with wide local excision (WLE) and whole breast irradiation. However, there is little evidence regarding the optimal axillary treatment in elderly breast cancer patients, since these patients are often excluded from clinical trials. We had done a retrospective study of breast cancer in the elderly, which demonstrated that those who with complex comorbidities receiving wide local excision merely were about 1.5 times more than those who without (71.2% vs 46.0%, p\<0.001). However, it is paradoxical that, on the one hand, the risk of dying from breast cancer may increase if patients do not receive the standard treatment; on the other hand, they could not live long enough to benefit or even suffer more from the standard treatment. The key is to figure out who they are. Given the high proportion of patients treated only with WLE, we believe that it is important to compare the effects of different surgical procedures on prognosis among the elderly BC patient in a prospective cohort study, to be more specific, comparing the WLE versus any other surgical procedures.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Breast Cancer Elderly Patient Wide Local Excision Surgery Survival Outcomes

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Observational Model Type

COHORT

Study Time Perspective

PROSPECTIVE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

1. WLE group

patients in this group receiving WLE merely

No interventions assigned to this group

2. other method group

patients in this group receiving any other surgical procedures except WLE

No interventions assigned to this group

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Clinical diagnosis of breast cancer
* Received surgical treatment in this institution
* Specific surgical method data available
* Demographic and pathological data available
* No clear evidence of distant metastasis
* Agree to participate in the trial and receive long-term follow-up

Exclusion Criteria

* Being intolerant of surgical treatment
* Distant metastases have been merged
* Patients who had simultaneous bilateral breast cancer
* Follow-up interval being less than 12 months except reaching endpoints of observation
Minimum Eligible Age

70 Years

Eligible Sex

FEMALE

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Peking Union Medical College Hospital

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Department of Breast Surgery,Peking Union Medical College Hospital

Beijing, Beijing Municipality, China

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

China

Central Contacts

Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.

Qiang Sun, Professor

Role: CONTACT

008613811669255

Ying Zhong, Doctor

Role: CONTACT

Facility Contacts

Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.

Qiang Sun, Professor

Role: primary

008613811669255

Ying Zhong, Doctor

Role: backup

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

PUMCH-2020-EBC

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.