Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
RECRUITING
2000 participants
OBSERVATIONAL
2011-07-01
2030-05-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Participants will be recruited from the neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) at OHSU, along with 4 collaborating institutions (William Beaumont Hospital, Stanford University, University of Illinois Chicago and University of Utah). Hospitalized infants who receive ROP screening examinations for routine care will be eligible for this study, and will be offered the opportunity to participate. Subjects who provide informed consent will have clinical data from routine care collected along with demographic characteristics, results from routine ROP screening examinations, presence of systemic disease or risk factors. Retinal photographs will be taken during these routine eye exams, using a commercially-available camera that has been FDA-cleared for taking pictures from retinas of premature infants. These retinal pictures do not contain any identifiable patient information, and are taken as routine standard of care.
The long-term goal of this research is to establish a quantitative framework for retinopathy of prematurity (ROP) care based on clinical, imaging, genetic, and informatics principles. The investigators have previously recruited and rigorously phenotyped and genotyped a large study cohort, including implementation of a novel reference standard diagnosis; and built a world-class research consortium for image, genetic, and bioinformatics analysis.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Cryotherapy for Retinopathy of Prematurity (CRYO-ROP) - Outcome Study of Cryotherapy for Retinopathy of Prematurity
NCT00000133
Telemedicine Approaches to Evaluating Acute-phase ROP
NCT01264276
VEGF In Systemic Circulation Of ROP-infants
NCT01470430
WINROP Algorithm Validation for Retinopathy Screening in a Cohort of Premature Infants
NCT03347799
Validation of i-ROP DL to Detect More Than Mild ROP
NCT06109285
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
This study will aim to develop a quantitative framework for ROP care using artificial intelligence and analytics to improve clinical disease management. The investigators will evaluate performance of an artificial intelligence system for ROP diagnosis and screening prospectively. This will include: (a) recruit a target of over 2000 eye exams including wide-angle retinal images from 375 subjects at 5 centers, (b) optimize an image quality detection algorithm the investigators have recently developed, and (c) analyze system accuracy for ROP diagnosis (plus vs. pre-plus vs. normal) and screening (using a novel quantitative vascular severity scale).
The proposed work will study infants who will receive routine ophthalmoscopic exams and have retinal images taken at each exam according to the standard of care at each institution. At least one person at each site is trained to capture wide-angle retinal images using a commercially-available camera (RetCam; Natus, Pleasanton, CA). This device is FDA-cleared for premature infants, and has been used throughout the world for 20 years with no known complications.
All participating infants will undergo retinal photography by trained study personnel for up to 3 eye exams, or more if clinically indicated and feasible. "Outborn infants," who were transferred to the study center for specialized ROP care, will have at least one set of images taken if this is clinically indicated and feasible. These coded retinal images will be read and interpreted by remote expert graders using the secure web-based system developed for this study 9 years ago at OHSU. The de-identified images will be housed indefinitely in an OHSU IRB-approved repository for possible future research studies or for other educational purposes.
Most infants recruited from the first 9 years of this study between July 2011 and May 2020 had DNA collected from blood or saliva samples. The coded genetic samples are housed in an OHSU IRB-approved repository and will be analyzed by outside collaborators for specific aim 3 of this study. Note that this current study does not involve new collection of any blood or saliva samples.
In recent years, our team has successfully developed competitive image assessment methods to infer ROP status using (i) engineered image features based on translating descriptive and visual descriptions related to expert assessment . and (ii) deep-learned features based on end-to-end training of neural networks for image analysis. To improve model explainability, the models must not only provide classification (diagnostic) labels or severity scores, but also supplementary information regarding how a model produces its decisions and what about a particular image drives the decision. To this end, it is helpful for a model to (i) visualize its training data; and (ii) illustrate which features of the input image its decision relied heavily on. Visualization can provide an overarching demonstration of how a model produces its decisions across a dataset with known clinical and demographic characteristics, which contributes to overall interpretability of the model's logic. Illustration is essential to gain trust and to facilitate validation when clinicians rely on the model to assess a particular instance for various purposes, including training or regulatory approval.
While training the AI system in previous work, the investigators excluded 5% of images that were rated by the majority of graders as "not acceptable quality". For real-world use, it will be important to balance imageability with diagnostic performance. The investigators propose to evaluate our existing dataset to determine the optimal operating point in the CNN quality algorithm that balances imageability with diagnostic performance of the i-ROP DL classifier. The investigators will continue those studies to systematically examine their impact on improving image quality and diagnostic performance - and maximize rigor and reproducibility of study design. This operating point will then be "locked", and the closed system will be used as below.
Prospective evaluation of i-ROP DL classifier: The investigators propose to calculate the weighted kappa between the RSD and the i-ROP DL system, along with sensitivity, specificity, and imageability based on the optimal operating points identified above.
Prospective evaluation of vascular severity score: In a cross sectional analysis, the investigators will test the hypothesis that the ROP vascular severity score, derived from the i-ROP DL classifier, may demonstrate high sensitivity both for detection of plus disease and for identifying treatment-requiring disease in a real-world ROP screening population.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
COHORT
PROSPECTIVE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
i-ROP cohort
Premature infants who are at risk of retinopathy of prematurity(ROP) at participating study sites. As standard of care, babies who are born less than 31 weeks gestational age or less than 1500 grams are routinely screened for ROP. Families are approached to participate in this study where finding from babies' eye exams and associated retinal images along with demographic and other health data are collected and coded with unique identifier. No intervention is administered. The ROP exams and images obtained are done as a standard of care and would be performed even if there is no consent provided.
No intervention administered.
Eye exams are standard of care and would be performed regardless of participation in this study.
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
No intervention administered.
Eye exams are standard of care and would be performed regardless of participation in this study.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
Exclusion Criteria
1 Year
ALL
Yes
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
National Institutes of Health (NIH)
NIH
U.S. National Science Foundation
FED
Massachusetts General Hospital
OTHER
Northeastern University
OTHER
Lundquist Institute for Biomedical Innovation at Harbor-UCLA Medical Center
OTHER
William Beaumont Hospitals
OTHER
University of Illinois at Chicago
OTHER
Stanford University
OTHER
University of Utah
OTHER
National Eye Institute (NEI)
NIH
Oregon Health and Science University
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Michael Chiang
Principal Investigator
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
John P Campbell, M.D.
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Oregon Health and Science University
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Stanford University
Palo Alto, California, United States
University of Illinois Chicago
Chicago, Illinois, United States
William Beaumont Hospital
Royal Oak, Michigan, United States
Oregon Health & Science University
Portland, Oregon, United States
University of Utah
Salt Lake City, Utah, United States
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Central Contacts
Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.
Facility Contacts
Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
STUDY21403
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.